banner
banner

25 Jun 2025, 14:41 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 00:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
I just don't get why someone would want a 414 over a 421. But that being said I have had my 421 going on 16 years. Just my thoughts. I liked reading the above post from 2014. You really have to be dedicated to own one of these. That is the truth. Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine.


Engine out climb is the only advantage I can see with the 414A. I was initially attracted to the RAM V water cooled bird, but seeing many being converted back tells me that's a no go.

Interesting that you've had yours 16 years but say to stay away. While I consider them different classes of airplane, what goes wrong on the twin Cessnas that doesn't have a counter on the P Baron?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 00:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/25/12
Posts: 3875
Post Likes: +4089
Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
I guess I did not know a 414 would out limb a 421.

I like my 421 because I have had it so long and can afford it. Most everything has broke in that time frame so now I know what to look for and expect. But how do you teach that? Not saying I now it all, just have gone through a lot of problems and most guys just want to fly and not fix.

_________________
Rocky Hill

Altitude is Everything.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 01:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 927
Post Likes: +469
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
I just don't get why someone would want a 414 over a 421. But that being said I have had my 421 going on 16 years. Just my thoughts. I liked reading the above post from 2014. You really have to be dedicated to own one of these. That is the truth. Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine.


Engine out climb is the only advantage I can see with the 414A. I was initially attracted to the RAM V water cooled bird, but seeing many being converted back tells me that's a no go.

Interesting that you've had yours 16 years but say to stay away. While I consider them different classes of airplane, what goes wrong on the twin Cessnas that doesn't have a counter on the P Baron?


421 has a better OEI the a 414. Remember a 414 has the same engine as a. 340 but is way more plane.

Andrew

Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 05:23 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/16/13
Posts: 58
Post Likes: +102
Aircraft: CE-510
Username Protected wrote:
Direct operating cost is approximately 600 dollars an hour or 10 dollars a minute.
Annuals are 8 to 10,000 per year. Every two years an extra 5 to 10,000 for something?
The first annual is always the most expensive, that's where you fix or repair everything the previous owner didn't. I bought a low time 1900 hour plane with Factory new engines and my first annual was 30,000 to fix and repair everything that was deferred by the last owner.


Reviving this old thread as I'm now contemplating 414A or 421C plus a few others. Anyone else echo Gerald's costs here? These are surprisingly manageable for me.



I would agree with these numbers except my first annual was just $8k (done by a twin Cessna shop). I moved up from a V35 and was worried about the potential for big ticket surprise expenses, but they haven't materialized.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 08:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/15/10
Posts: 594
Post Likes: +297
Location: Burlington VT KBTV
Aircraft: C441 N441WD
Prebuy, prebuy, prebuy!!! This is your only opportunity to have someone else pay for your repairs. I've purchased two 35 year old Cessna's (421C, 441)in the last 3 years, so I have some experience. Your first year will likely be burdened by some catch-up maintenance. Don't focus just on engines. The airframe and accessories can add up to a lot of $(I happen to know). Year 2 should be easier on the wallet, but in my case I lost confidence in the airplane (421C) after an engine out on takeoff.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 08:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
but in my case I lost confidence in the airplane (421C) after an engine out on takeoff.


You must have done it right since you are here to post about it. Did the 421C not perform as advertised ? Or did advertised performance just open you eyes when it was more than numbers in a book ?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 10:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/15/10
Posts: 594
Post Likes: +297
Location: Burlington VT KBTV
Aircraft: C441 N441WD
It performed as advertised and saved my bacon when the s**t hit the fan. The GTSIO is a fabulous engine, but it is very complex and there are some design shortcomings that have caused a high number of engine malfunctions. I am biased, and there are many 421 drivers that have run several engines to TBO without incident, so don't be discouraged. Commit to training and proficiency and you will be fine. Get complacent and have a 'it won't happen to me' attitude and this airplane can bite you.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 10:54 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20389
Post Likes: +25574
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine.

That's my advice, go turbine if you can.

I fly mine for 421 prices (maybe less if the DOC is really $600/hr for a 421) and I get to enjoy 300 knots, 2500 FPM climbs, and superior dispatch reliability.

Is a P Baron really less maintenance than a 421?

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 11:22 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20389
Post Likes: +25574
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I guess I did not know a 414 would out limb a 421.

I don't think it does.

421C at gross (7450 lbs) OEI climb rate is 350 FPM (source, 1976 421C POH).

414A at gross (6750 lbs) OEI climb rate is 270 FPM (source, RAM web page).

It should be noted the 421C is carrying more useful load at gross, so when the two planes are loaded for the same flight (same cabin load, same fuel range), the 421C advantage grows.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 11:43 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2765
Post Likes: +2616
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
If your choice is between a 414 and 421, get the 421. Costs are about the same between the birds, and the 421 is just an all around better airplane (no offense to the 414 crowd).

More useful load, quieter, slightly faster, higher resale value, etc.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 13:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine.

That's my advice, go turbine if you can.

I fly mine for 421 prices (maybe less if the DOC is really $600/hr for a 421) and I get to enjoy 300 knots, 2500 FPM climbs, and superior dispatch reliability.

Is a P Baron really less maintenance than a 421?

Mike C.


I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it. It will hurt, but I can do it. Is my thinking there flawed? I'm here to learn.

What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 14:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12813
Post Likes: +5259
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Used 331's are available. Catastrophic failures are rare and when they do happen you can usually part the plane out (or sell as is) with less loss than a full overhaul.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 14:23 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20389
Post Likes: +25574
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it.

An unexpected hot section on a TPE331 is $50-100K. Depends on how much needs to be replaced and what happened at the event.

An unexpected overhaul on a GTSIO-520 is $50-80K. Depends on whether you got case cracks. The exhaust is likely to be $15K on top of that.

The likelihood you need the first is very slim. Note that insurance often has FOD protection.

Outside of unexpected events, the cost to maintain the TPE331 is about the same as the GTSIO-520. The TPE331 is less routinely (oil samples, nozzle cleaning basically, no plugs, mags, etc), but has larger events spaced further apart.

Quote:
What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days?

$250-$600K for most of them depending on how you define "decent". Main issue is lack of inventory, good ones go fast and off market.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2016, 15:36 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5959
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:

I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it. It will hurt, but I can do it. Is my thinking there flawed? I'm here to learn.

What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days?


Depending on which engine you chose, there are plenty of halftime or exchange TPE's around. Especially the -5 engines you find in most Commander 690's and in some MU-2's. The -5's are very abundant today, because of people upgrading to -10's on the Commanders. You can probably buy an exchange -5 for about $30/hrs left, at the lower end. That's $54K for 1800hrs, probably less than most piston engines would cost. So one doesn't have to overhaul from scratch when the time is up.

The earlier -1's can also be found, but are a little less common. The early Commander and MU-2's both share that engine and I think James Crossno here flies an MU-2 with those. I have them in my 680V. These aircraft will have the lowest entry price, so if that's important you should look at Commander 681's and MU-2F's. Good thing about the -1's is that they're pretty fuel efficient. But even later 690's with the -5's can be had for less than some high end pistons.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2016, 09:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2765
Post Likes: +2616
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:
An unexpected overhaul on a GTSIO-520 is $50-80K. Depends on whether you got case cracks.


Sorry Mike, the upper end of your numbers are way off base. Factory reman from Continental is mid $50's and no charge for a cracked case.

Robert


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.