25 Jun 2025, 13:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 00:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/05/15 Posts: 381 Post Likes: +104 Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just don't get why someone would want a 414 over a 421. But that being said I have had my 421 going on 16 years. Just my thoughts. I liked reading the above post from 2014. You really have to be dedicated to own one of these. That is the truth. Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine. Engine out climb is the only advantage I can see with the 414A. I was initially attracted to the RAM V water cooled bird, but seeing many being converted back tells me that's a no go. Interesting that you've had yours 16 years but say to stay away. While I consider them different classes of airplane, what goes wrong on the twin Cessnas that doesn't have a counter on the P Baron?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 01:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 927 Post Likes: +469 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just don't get why someone would want a 414 over a 421. But that being said I have had my 421 going on 16 years. Just my thoughts. I liked reading the above post from 2014. You really have to be dedicated to own one of these. That is the truth. Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine. Engine out climb is the only advantage I can see with the 414A. I was initially attracted to the RAM V water cooled bird, but seeing many being converted back tells me that's a no go. Interesting that you've had yours 16 years but say to stay away. While I consider them different classes of airplane, what goes wrong on the twin Cessnas that doesn't have a counter on the P Baron?
421 has a better OEI the a 414. Remember a 414 has the same engine as a. 340 but is way more plane.
Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 05:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/16/13 Posts: 58 Post Likes: +102
Aircraft: CE-510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Direct operating cost is approximately 600 dollars an hour or 10 dollars a minute. Annuals are 8 to 10,000 per year. Every two years an extra 5 to 10,000 for something? The first annual is always the most expensive, that's where you fix or repair everything the previous owner didn't. I bought a low time 1900 hour plane with Factory new engines and my first annual was 30,000 to fix and repair everything that was deferred by the last owner. Reviving this old thread as I'm now contemplating 414A or 421C plus a few others. Anyone else echo Gerald's costs here? These are surprisingly manageable for me.
I would agree with these numbers except my first annual was just $8k (done by a twin Cessna shop). I moved up from a V35 and was worried about the potential for big ticket surprise expenses, but they haven't materialized.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 08:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/05/15 Posts: 381 Post Likes: +104 Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: but in my case I lost confidence in the airplane (421C) after an engine out on takeoff. You must have done it right since you are here to post about it. Did the 421C not perform as advertised ? Or did advertised performance just open you eyes when it was more than numbers in a book ?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 10:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25574 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine. That's my advice, go turbine if you can. I fly mine for 421 prices (maybe less if the DOC is really $600/hr for a 421) and I get to enjoy 300 knots, 2500 FPM climbs, and superior dispatch reliability. Is a P Baron really less maintenance than a 421? Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 11:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25574 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I guess I did not know a 414 would out limb a 421. I don't think it does. 421C at gross (7450 lbs) OEI climb rate is 350 FPM (source, 1976 421C POH). 414A at gross (6750 lbs) OEI climb rate is 270 FPM (source, RAM web page). It should be noted the 421C is carrying more useful load at gross, so when the two planes are loaded for the same flight (same cabin load, same fuel range), the 421C advantage grows. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 11:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2765 Post Likes: +2616 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
If your choice is between a 414 and 421, get the 421. Costs are about the same between the birds, and the 421 is just an all around better airplane (no offense to the 414 crowd).
More useful load, quieter, slightly faster, higher resale value, etc.
Robert
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 13:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/05/15 Posts: 381 Post Likes: +104 Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anymore I would not recommend a twin Cessna to most pilots I know. Too much stuff that can break. Go P Baron or skip the rest and go to turbine. That's my advice, go turbine if you can. I fly mine for 421 prices (maybe less if the DOC is really $600/hr for a 421) and I get to enjoy 300 knots, 2500 FPM climbs, and superior dispatch reliability. Is a P Baron really less maintenance than a 421? Mike C.
I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it. It will hurt, but I can do it. Is my thinking there flawed? I'm here to learn.
What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 14:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25574 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it. An unexpected hot section on a TPE331 is $50-100K. Depends on how much needs to be replaced and what happened at the event. An unexpected overhaul on a GTSIO-520 is $50-80K. Depends on whether you got case cracks. The exhaust is likely to be $15K on top of that. The likelihood you need the first is very slim. Note that insurance often has FOD protection. Outside of unexpected events, the cost to maintain the TPE331 is about the same as the GTSIO-520. The TPE331 is less routinely (oil samples, nozzle cleaning basically, no plugs, mags, etc), but has larger events spaced further apart. Quote: What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days? $250-$600K for most of them depending on how you define "decent". Main issue is lack of inventory, good ones go fast and off market. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 12 Jun 2016, 15:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5959 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would love to go turbine, but even if I get past the initial cost I don't think I can maintain a reserve to replace a TPE 331. If a GTSIO 520 takes a dump I can replace it. It will hurt, but I can do it. Is my thinking there flawed? I'm here to learn.
What does it take to buy a decent short body Rice Rocket these days?
Depending on which engine you chose, there are plenty of halftime or exchange TPE's around. Especially the -5 engines you find in most Commander 690's and in some MU-2's. The -5's are very abundant today, because of people upgrading to -10's on the Commanders. You can probably buy an exchange -5 for about $30/hrs left, at the lower end. That's $54K for 1800hrs, probably less than most piston engines would cost. So one doesn't have to overhaul from scratch when the time is up. The earlier -1's can also be found, but are a little less common. The early Commander and MU-2's both share that engine and I think James Crossno here flies an MU-2 with those. I have them in my 680V. These aircraft will have the lowest entry price, so if that's important you should look at Commander 681's and MU-2F's. Good thing about the -1's is that they're pretty fuel efficient. But even later 690's with the -5's can be had for less than some high end pistons.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Price point between 414 v 421 Posted: 13 Jun 2016, 09:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2765 Post Likes: +2616 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: An unexpected overhaul on a GTSIO-520 is $50-80K. Depends on whether you got case cracks. Sorry Mike, the upper end of your numbers are way off base. Factory reman from Continental is mid $50's and no charge for a cracked case. Robert
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|