09 Jun 2025, 02:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 21 Apr 2016, 08:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/11 Posts: 815 Post Likes: +463 Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I guess I'll just wait and let this play out. I'm sure there will be a meeting of the minds about how best to regulate this, at some point. Seems kind of silly, but according to the letter of the law, someone can not fly one of these drones in their back yard just a few feet off the ground if within 5 miles of any airport without permission, even if it's a private farmers dirt strip.
Larry Just as a point of clarification, when you call the airport manager/control tower, it is advisory only at this point. They do not have the authority to give/not give permission to the RC flight. You are advising them of your location. What they do with that information I'm not sure - add it to a NOTAM temporarily? As an aside, I worry WAY more about birds than *drones*. However I have met *drone* owners at our RC field who are far less intellectual than birds... Chip-
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 10:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/28/13 Posts: 196 Post Likes: +31 Location: Norwell, MA
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
Drones are becoming more popular as many real estate brokers are using the technology to benefit there real estate ads. as well as the hobbyist. The FAA says no higher than 400M or 500 feet AGL shall a drone be allowed to exceed. IMO the drone manufacturers should be required to set this limitation within their product. As a helicopter pilot I am quite nervous. My question is: Can drones be picked up on radar?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 23 Apr 2016, 10:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20300 Post Likes: +25437 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Drones are becoming more popular as many real estate brokers are using the technology to benefit there real estate ads. as well as the hobbyist. Interestingly enough, the FAA has cracked down on the real estate uses of drones citing that as "commercial" use. So those folks have to apply for and get FAA authorization to use the drones to take pictures of houses for real estate ads. This has dramatically reduced the use of drones in that capacity. So the odd result is that hobbyists, non commercial drone flyers, typically not professionally trained or inclined, can run around your neighborhood all day, but the pros, who would operate carefully, can't. Quote: My question is: Can drones be picked up on radar? I would expect the answer is generally no. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 03:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14309 Post Likes: +16259 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can drones be picked up on radar? Apparently, the various radars around DC never spotted the gyro copter that landed landed downtown. I expect that a drone would have a smaller radar cross-section than a gyro copter. According to AW&ST, various firms are developing drone counter-measures using very high-freq radar and lidar. And, FWIW, DARPA has their "Gremlins" program ... to use swarms of micro-UAS's to overwhelm fire-control and counter-measure systems.
_________________ Holoholo …
Last edited on 24 Apr 2016, 11:03, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 03:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14309 Post Likes: +16259 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just as a point of clarification, when you call the airport manager/control tower, it is advisory only at this point. They do not have the authority to give/not give permission to the RC flight. You are advising them of your location. What they do with that information I'm not sure - add it to a NOTAM temporarily? Correct for (only) hobbyists. Unfortunate that the FAA's own B4UFLY app does not even attempt to list the contact info required for prior notification. Commercial drone operators have different rules. From the FAA website/FAQ: "Under the Section 333 exemption the civil UAS operator may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport's management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to FAA officials or any law enforcement official upon request."
_________________ Holoholo …
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 11:49 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 12/13/07 Posts: 20413 Post Likes: +10431 Location: Seeley Lake, MT (23S)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My question is: Can drones be picked up on radar? Of course, but that's not the problem. In order for radar to be useful you have to filter out the stuff it sees that you don't want to display. Such as the ground, trees, trains, cars, etc. ATC does that by the moving target indicator circuit(MTI). It's a user selectable setting to filter out non or slow moving targets. I think we had ours set to around 40 knots. Anything moving slower than that was simply filtered out. So if the drone is hovering in a spot or moving less than the filtered limit then the controller isn't going to see a primary target because the computer will remove it.
_________________ Want to go here?: https://tinyurl.com/FlyMT1
tinyurl.com/35som8p
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 12:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20300 Post Likes: +25437 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I heard one of the more dangerous things from engine ingestion is the NiCad battery, since it can explode. Drones are almost universally lithium batteries. They need high energy/weight ratio and NiCads don't have that. Lithium batteries do not explode, they can burn. Subjected to a jet engine, the expected result is that they are dismembered to the point they would not even burn. The risk of damage is just the material going through the engine itself, not an additional explosion or fire. It should be noted that weather balloons are released all the time into the air. Their are specific construction guidelines, however (FAR 101.1). They usually carry lithium batteries as well. http://petapixel.com/2011/11/08/camera- ... flying-by/Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 12:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/17/12 Posts: 617 Post Likes: +413 Location: Greensboro, NC
Aircraft: C170B, BE35, CRJ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mark,
You were very lucky. I heard one of the more dangerous things from engine ingestion is the NiCad battery, since it can explode.
Just curious, whom did you report this too?
Larry A NiCd won't explode. A LiPo will burn like a blowtorch if compromised, but not explode. There is a lot of potential energy in LiPos, and for "drones" there is no use for a NiCd because it doesn't contain nearly the energy potential that a LiPo does, and the on-board systems are run from a BEC that siphons power from the main battery that powers the motors. Even in conventional R/C models, NiCds are seldom used anymore because of their weight and poor performance (even for servos and receivers) compared to other battery technologies like LiFe, which is a variation of a lithium chemistry that has a much lower current capacity than a LiPo, and has a lower nominal voltage as well. I'm not trying to single you out, Larry, but if you are listening to someone that says that NiCds are dangerous because they can explode, and you are deducing your opinions regarding unmanned systems based on this, you need to stop listening to that person. Dayton is a hotbed of R/C activity, and if you are interested, I can put you in touch with some sharp people that can walk you through different R/C aircraft and give you a crash course on their design, construction, and operation. Most of these guys are also full-scale pilots as well, but they fly R/C as a hobby. Many of them also are familiar with drones proper, if you will, and can provide more information on them as well.
Last edited on 24 Apr 2016, 12:43, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 03 May 2016, 21:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12257 Post Likes: +16538 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Correct for (only) hobbyists. Unfortunate that the FAA's own B4UFLY app does not even attempt to list the contact info required for prior notification.
Here is an excellent map for quadcopter guys. Shows airports, airspace, AND phone numbers. https://app.airmap.io/index.html#I have a Phantom 4 that just shipped today.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Drones a serious threat Posted: 03 May 2016, 22:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/27/08 Posts: 3394 Post Likes: +1456 Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Correct for (only) hobbyists. Unfortunate that the FAA's own B4UFLY app does not even attempt to list the contact info required for prior notification.
Here is an excellent map for quadcopter guys. Shows airports, airspace, AND phone numbers. https://app.airmap.io/index.html#I have a Phantom 4 that just shipped today.
Nate,
You will love the 4. I have the P3P and I am amazed by the video and pictures. I have flown over two miles away and still had good reception. Kevin
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|