18 Nov 2025, 14:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 16:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/09/13 Posts: 1249 Post Likes: +246 Location: Frederick , MD (KHGR)
Aircraft: C421 B36TC 58P
|
|
|
Get into the partnership as long as you get in fair. The partnership only works if you have a clear and defined exit plan if 1 needs out...
_________________ Good Luck,
Tim -------------------
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 17:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20748 Post Likes: +26220 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Turbo 550, same $$ as a TN bo, nothing special. You wouldn't think so, but... TSIO-520-BE (original Malibu engine): $73,253 TSIO-550-C (550 upgrade): $68,741 IO-550-B (A36 stock engine): $41,200 (no turbo or controller OH). There is a difference. I've noticed that PA46 engines cost more. Perhaps TCM is trying to make back money lost when they first came out and had so many engine problems, or maybe they perceive higher liability to the PA46. For whatever reason, overhaul are more expensive with the PA46. Figures from factoryengines.com for "rebuilt". Includes turbochargers and controller overhaul where applicable. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 17:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20748 Post Likes: +26220 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thoughts? Do you want to travel reliably? If so, pressurization and known ice are game changers that significantly add to the utility of the airplane. Pressurization, in particular, will be difficult to give up in the future. If you can work out contention for the airplane during high demand times (say around holidays), then I'd go for the PA46. Partnerships work best if the trips are mostly day trips or otherwise not often away from home base a long time. The correct buy in should be half the value of the airplane if it were to sell on the open market. Realize that asking prices aren't typically the actual sales price. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 17:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Turbo 550, same $$ as a TN bo, nothing special.
Yes, i would offer him half of current appraised value and then cap your OH contribution to 125/1600 of cost Half the current appraised value with a runout engine? Then he pays half the OH. Half the current appraised value with an OH engine? Then the other guy pays for the OH.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 17:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20748 Post Likes: +26220 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Half the current appraised value with a runout engine? Then he pays half the OH.
Half the current appraised value with an OH engine? Then the other guy pays for the OH. The appraised value changes with engine state. If the value goes up by the OH costs, then no net change in cash outlay. It probably isn't one to one, but there is a substantial value gain on engine OH. There can be advantages to lower purchase price and then doing the OH. Sales tax on plane purchase is less, and in some states there is no sales tax on plane parts, the overhaul. Also helps with depreciation in that you can often expense the engine but not the airframe. Also, it might be good to be part of the OH decision process so that you know what you are paying for. Flying past TBO is also an option if engine health indicates it. Those are "free" hours. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 18:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/14/12 Posts: 2001 Post Likes: +1494 Location: Hampton, VA
Aircraft: AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Turbo 550, same $$ as a TN bo, nothing special.
Yes, i would offer him half of current appraised value and then cap your OH contribution to 125/1600 of cost I disagree. When it comes time for an O/H, you need to assume you'll be on the hook for 1/2 the cost. However, the value of the plane, and the value of your 1/2 share should reflect the upcoming engine O/H. I agree with Mike, a pressurized aircraft (with ice protection) really changes the game in terms of capability. It also means you are going to have to deal with higher operating (and training) costs (there is more stuff to maintain on a Malibu than a Bonanza). Partnerships are great if your utilization is fairly low, and the cost of your target airplane is high. But it takes the right match to make one work. You need to have compatible philosophies on ownership or even the best economic sense won't overcome the inevitable heart break and rift.
_________________ Forrest
'---x-O-x---'
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: whole A36 vs 1/2 PA46 Posted: 23 Jan 2016, 23:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20748 Post Likes: +26220 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You Better check the cost of annuals, maintenance and yearly training. Ask to see the books on the plane for the last 3-5 years. All the expenses it has had. That will get you mentally prepared for what it costs. Also, the care and organization of the invoices and documents will tell you something about the partner. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|