banner
banner

23 Nov 2025, 19:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:03 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8726
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:

Well said. Frankly time is the most valuable resource. It is also not possible to work on the airlines especially in the cheap seats that I buy, but with GA you can.


My wife agonizes over airline costs. First Class is way cheaper than flying myself but I'm not gonna tell her that! :D

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
If flying were so hard it wouldn't be one of the lowest paying jobs.

A new Phenom is easier to fly and more automated than a 10 year old CJ. The trend will continue and the only folks complaining are the ones suffering from Old Timey Pilot Think. ha :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:40 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Since this post I have added all my receipts for my PC12 and it came out to $1K an hour to operate. That's just dividing all expenses by the number of hours on the airframe. Some years airplane ownership is cheap. Some years it's not. Just depends.


I think you can run a CJ2/3 for that cost.

Flying 300 hours/year:

Fuel @120 GPH @$2.50 = $300
Engines @ $150 * 2 = $300
Maintenance $25,000/yr = $83
Insurance $15,000/yr = $50
Hangar $30,000/yr = $100
Navdata - $5,000/yr = $17
P&I Reserve - $7,500 = $25

Hourly cost for 300 hours/yr = $875

Cost/NM @ 350kts = $2.70

Anything material I am missing in mine that you have in your $1,000/hr? At 250kts block speed it is costing you $4/nm.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13631
Post Likes: +7766
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Username Protected wrote:
What they have REALLY simplified is staying alive when the SHTF. Look how much time the rest of us dedicate to only that.

This is exactly the sort of false comfort that leads to high accident rates.

Complexity of aircraft systems hardly ever factors into GA accidents. Lack of pilot judgment, particularly continuing into riskier situations, is a major factor, and you can't automate that away in the design of the machine. Telling Cirrus pilots they can be lesser trained is a recipe for disaster, and the early SR series accident rate showed that. What fix it? More training.

You can be darn sure the FSB (Flight Standards Board, the people who set the standards for type ratings) is not going to give SF50 pilots a pass on the type rating. I think we are going to find a bunch of soft SR22 pilots who can't cut the mustard when it comes to a jet type rating, even on a slow limited jet. It would not surprise me if half the pilots showing up for the SF50 course have deficient hand flown instrument skills.

Mike C.


In your singular focus, you assumed I was talking about pulling the handle.

Simplifying does not mean reducing. They have exact procedures based on flight regime and failure mode. They have created conformity in training and have streamlined the process for the pilot community.

The MU2 benefitted when SFAR 108 forced created a single track for the best training. They simplified decision making and procedures for pilots by ALWAYS teaching the proper techniques. Cirrus has done the same thing.

If you receive training in a Bonanza, otoh, you may find 10 answers to the same questions. Beechtalk is full of threads where experienced pilots argue about the correct procedures. This COMPLICATES training and diminishes safety.

Best,
_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
That's the first time Ive ever heard anyone claim a CJ3 costs $1k an hour to operate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2416
Post Likes: +2774
Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
Username Protected wrote:
If flying were so hard it wouldn't be one of the lowest paying jobs.

A new Phenom is easier to fly and more automated than a 10 year old CJ. The trend will continue and the only folks complaining are the ones suffering from Old Timey Pilot Think. ha :D


Unless you upgrade it to a G1000....

;)


Last edited on 30 Dec 2015, 13:00, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 12:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
That's the first time Ive ever heard anyone claim a CJ3 costs $1k an hour to operate.


Jet-A at $2.50 helps alot. At $5.00 it would add $300/hour.

Insurance has dropped almost in half over the last 5 years.

The fixed costs makes low utilization expensive. Fly it 100 hours and it would cost $1425/hour with my numbers.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2416
Post Likes: +2774
Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
Username Protected wrote:
That's the first time Ive ever heard anyone claim a CJ3 costs $1k an hour to operate.


Jet-A at $2.50 helps alot. At $5.00 it would add $300/hour.

Insurance has dropped almost in half over the last 5 years.

The fixed costs makes low utilization expensive. Fly it 100 hours and it would cost $1425/hour with my numbers.


And at $1.67 per gallon it is even better!

Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Cheap gas definitely puts a dent in jet operating expenses.

My insurance payment is a lot higher than yours. I wonder what $25mm in a CJ3 would be for me?

Also, my FBO fees are considerably less than a jet. I wonder how they would play in?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Simplifying does not mean reducing. They have exact procedures based on flight regime and failure mode. They have created conformity in training and have streamlined the process for the pilot community.



Cirrus also has reasonable conformity across their aircraft fleet.

You have a wide range of Bonanzas and Barons on BT with varying engines and avionics and model differences.

Cirrus brought down to the piston SE practices the turbine fleet has been doing for years.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:21 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5840
Post Likes: +7288
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:

And at $1.67 per gallon it is even better!

Why is there no similar program for Avgas? Just not enough demand?

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Why is there no similar program for Avgas? Just not enough demand?

Yup


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:

My insurance payment is a lot higher than yours. I wonder what $25mm in a CJ3 would be for me?

Also, my FBO fees are considerably less than a jet. I wonder how they would play in?


My insurance was a lot higher a few years ago. I don't know how much of the drop was based on increased experience versus market competition. You have to work with a really good experienced broker. I am sure you will pay more then me, I have a really good deal.

I try to avoid the high fee FBOs. Rarely go to Signature, Atlantic, or Landmark.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

My insurance was a lot higher a few years ago. I don't know how much of the drop was based on increased experience versus market competition. You have to work with a really good experienced broker. I am sure you will pay more then me, I have a really good deal.

I try to avoid the high fee FBOs. Rarely go to Signature, Atlantic, or Landmark.

Do you carry $25MM or more on insurance? Mine would be a lot lower if I would agree to $5MM.

I avoid high fee FBO's too but many of the places I fly it isn't really an option.

The reason I didn't buy a CJ3 when I bought my PC12 in 2013 was because the CJ3 was $5MM and the PC12 was in the low 3's. Operating expenses aren't my issue. Now that I have a PC12 I'm just holding off because jet prices keep dropping with all the new ones coming out. And, believe it or not, the PC12 does have several advantages over the CJ3 and Phenom that I will miss if and when I make the switch.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2015, 13:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/09
Posts: 4789
Post Likes: +2500
Company: retired corporate mostly
Location: Chico,California KCIC/CL56
Aircraft: 1956 Champion 7EC
Allen,

Your 2+ is thrifty. I burn a bunch more in the boss' CJ4. Usually close to 1600 first hour 1200 after at 40/41. Maybe 900 at 450. A little faster, not so much difference on a short trip though. Company policy is to use go fast mode so we sit pretty close to MMO.

_________________
Jeff

soloed in a land of Superhomers/1959 Cessna 150, retired with Proline 21/ CJ4.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152 ... 512  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.aerox_85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.avnav.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.