banner
banner

08 Jun 2025, 22:13 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 26 Dec 2015, 23:51 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/04/14
Posts: 493
Post Likes: +113
Company: Take Flight Avaition.
Location: Franklin, TN
Aircraft: Piper PA46 Jet Prop
I am really trying to move my family up to a pressurized aircraft. I have looked at 421's and 414's but I am also considering some of the early Piper Malibu's. I would love some feedback on them. What is good, what is not so good and what are things I should look out for when I am shopping for one.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 26 Dec 2015, 23:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8869
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Track down Kevin Mead. I believe he retired from running the shop but still consults on purchases and mechanical issues.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 00:08 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14380
Post Likes: +9509
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
There are some threads floating around, try search. The consensus seems to be that the best are well cared for early models that have been upgraded to the Continental 550.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 00:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5959
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
May I also suggest Aerostars worthy of a little look see? Cabin not as big as the 421's etc, but about the same size as the Malibu. Great planes. Could be an alternative. Just mentioning it.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 02:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7370
Post Likes: +4834
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
I am really trying to move my family up to a pressurized aircraft. I have looked at 421's and 414's but I am also considering some of the early Piper Malibu's. I would love some feedback on them. What is good, what is not so good and what are things I should look out for when I am shopping for one.

Have you sat in one? If you are tall you may have issues. Over 6'. I'm 6'3" and I can't sit in the cockpit of one without cocking my head away from the ceiling and it's not comfortable in legroom either.

Dunno how big your family is, but like most the Malibu is a good 4 person airplane, OK for 5 and tight for 6 even though it seats 6. Earlier models will have more useful load. They don't have much baggage space compared to twin Cessnae due to lack of nose baggage and nacelle baggage.

But they are a nice pressurized traveling airplane with decent range and obviously good efficiency for a pressurized craft. Just make sure you go sit in one for a while before you buy.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 17:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/05/09
Posts: 344
Post Likes: +186
Location: Portland, Oregon
Aircraft: MU-2F
FWIW, if you are looking at pressurized planes, the P210 will cost less to buy and less to operate than a Malibu if it meets your needs otherwise. If you have to have a twin, the P-Skymaster is worth a look at least as it will be the least expensive P twin to buy and fly. Just a thought......


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 18:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12805
Post Likes: +5255
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Search my posts - I've written a lot about the '86 i flew.

Great plane and if you have 2-4 kids plenty big. It does have nose baggage big enough for two car seats.

Pm me also if you want to talk on the phone


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 21:56 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/11/09
Posts: 1377
Post Likes: +490
Company: UNLV
Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
Username Protected wrote:
FWIW, if you are looking at pressurized planes, the P210 will cost less to buy and less to operate than a Malibu if it meets your needs otherwise. If you have to have a twin, the P-Skymaster is worth a look at least as it will be the least expensive P twin to buy and fly. Just a thought......


As a P337 owner/operator, I agree 100%.

_________________
Ken Reed
57AZ


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2015, 23:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1576
Post Likes: +1480
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Cliff,

I see you fly a Saratoga. the Malibu is in my opinion much larger than the Togo. I am 6'5" 250lbs and can fit in a toga but the Malibu is so much more comfortable.

There are some extensive insurance requirements for the Malibu. You will need to attend a Malibu School and have a fair amount of dual time before you can or should Solo.

We really tried to get into a Malibu but the insurance requirements and cost were just too much, I would need 50hrs of dual before I could solo. So we decided to go to the Toga for a year or so and then move up to the Malibu when we feel comfortable and have more time under our belts.

I don't think you can beet the efficiency and payload of there early Malibu's. 200kts at 16gph and 1350lbs useful load.

MP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 00:29 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/11/09
Posts: 1377
Post Likes: +490
Company: UNLV
Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
Username Protected wrote:
We really tried to get into a Malibu but the insurance requirements and cost were just too much, I would need 50hrs of dual before I could solo.


Of course that will depend on where you are in your flying career and who your broker is. Earlier this month I got a quote on a Malibu. I have zero hours make and model. For $300k hull, the premium was $4k per year with the only requirement being a two day school given by a local guy and no school the next year (only an IPC) if I fly 100 hours the first year. There were no dual requirements after the two days.

_________________
Ken Reed
57AZ


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 12:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12805
Post Likes: +5255
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Username Protected wrote:
We really tried to get into a Malibu but the insurance requirements and cost were just too much, I would need 50hrs of dual before I could solo.


Of course that will depend on where you are in your flying career and who your broker is. Earlier this month I got a quote on a Malibu. I have zero hours make and model. For $300k hull, the premium was $4k per year with the only requirement being a two day school given by a local guy and no school the next year (only an IPC) if I fly 100 hours the first year. There were no dual requirements after the two days.


I got into one on similar terms at 700tt

Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 12:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1576
Post Likes: +1480
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Yeah you guys are right it all depends on experience and time. I am pretty low time and it was a big step up. the premium we were quoted was $6k year.

But from what I have read even high time guys need some good training in the Malibu which I think the 2 day school will cover. I still think its good idea to have a qualified CFI available to work with you more and really make sure you have it down.

Here is a plane we were looking at. [Link]http://pristineairplanes.com/listing/1987-piper-malibu/[/Link] New Engine, new interior, avionics gone thru, 180hr prop, super clean Paint, and great useful load.

We will be buying our Saratoga from Matt at Pristine. He has been amazing to work with and has some really nice aircraft. You will pay a premium on acquisition cost but you will make it up on maintenance. I would rather pay more per month and know what I am paying then wonder what nutty maintenance issue will pop up each month.

MP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 15:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12805
Post Likes: +5255
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
The Malibu flies like a lance. Stick and rudder stuff isn't hard. But it has a lot of systems. Knowing normal and abnormal ops for all wx conditions is the challenge. Flight planning 1000nm trips is a big task too.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 15:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/05/14
Posts: 12
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Aircraft: Piper PA-46-350P
MP,
Ironic, just talked to Matt about the Malibu too. Joe Casey @ http://www.joecaseyaviation.com has excellent commentary for those interested in a Malibu. BTW, has anyone had experience with, Aircraft Sales Inc. located in Smithville, OH? (http://www.pristine aircraft.com) The website shows attractive airplanes for sale. Thanks!

Mike Brown
Chattanooga, TN
mike.brown@raymondjames.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2015, 16:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1576
Post Likes: +1480
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Michael,

I did a ton of research and checked with past customers of Matt. He has plenty of guys that have bought multiple planes from him so that is a really good sign.

I have been working with him for months on a Saratoga and then the Malibu and back to the Toga. I literally have talked to the guy for hours and hours and have had a ton of emails and text. I am pretty good at sniffing out bullcrap and there was none.

I could not find any negative reports from anyone. Given that he has sold over 300 aircraft since 2008 I would assume there would be some bad blood, but there wasn't any I could find.

I would consider him trustworthy and am comfortable doing business with him on a plane site unseen, and I don't take that lightly.

MP


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.dbm.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.