08 Jun 2025, 22:13 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu Posted: 27 Dec 2015, 02:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7370 Post Likes: +4834 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am really trying to move my family up to a pressurized aircraft. I have looked at 421's and 414's but I am also considering some of the early Piper Malibu's. I would love some feedback on them. What is good, what is not so good and what are things I should look out for when I am shopping for one. Have you sat in one? If you are tall you may have issues. Over 6'. I'm 6'3" and I can't sit in the cockpit of one without cocking my head away from the ceiling and it's not comfortable in legroom either. Dunno how big your family is, but like most the Malibu is a good 4 person airplane, OK for 5 and tight for 6 even though it seats 6. Earlier models will have more useful load. They don't have much baggage space compared to twin Cessnae due to lack of nose baggage and nacelle baggage. But they are a nice pressurized traveling airplane with decent range and obviously good efficiency for a pressurized craft. Just make sure you go sit in one for a while before you buy.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu Posted: 27 Dec 2015, 17:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/05/09 Posts: 344 Post Likes: +186 Location: Portland, Oregon
Aircraft: MU-2F
|
|
FWIW, if you are looking at pressurized planes, the P210 will cost less to buy and less to operate than a Malibu if it meets your needs otherwise. If you have to have a twin, the P-Skymaster is worth a look at least as it will be the least expensive P twin to buy and fly. Just a thought......
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu Posted: 27 Dec 2015, 21:56 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/11/09 Posts: 1377 Post Likes: +490 Company: UNLV Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: FWIW, if you are looking at pressurized planes, the P210 will cost less to buy and less to operate than a Malibu if it meets your needs otherwise. If you have to have a twin, the P-Skymaster is worth a look at least as it will be the least expensive P twin to buy and fly. Just a thought...... As a P337 owner/operator, I agree 100%.
_________________ Ken Reed 57AZ
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu Posted: 28 Dec 2015, 00:29 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/11/09 Posts: 1377 Post Likes: +490 Company: UNLV Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We really tried to get into a Malibu but the insurance requirements and cost were just too much, I would need 50hrs of dual before I could solo. Of course that will depend on where you are in your flying career and who your broker is. Earlier this month I got a quote on a Malibu. I have zero hours make and model. For $300k hull, the premium was $4k per year with the only requirement being a two day school given by a local guy and no school the next year (only an IPC) if I fly 100 hours the first year. There were no dual requirements after the two days.
_________________ Ken Reed 57AZ
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Looking for some information on Early Piper Malibu Posted: 28 Dec 2015, 12:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12805 Post Likes: +5255 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We really tried to get into a Malibu but the insurance requirements and cost were just too much, I would need 50hrs of dual before I could solo. Of course that will depend on where you are in your flying career and who your broker is. Earlier this month I got a quote on a Malibu. I have zero hours make and model. For $300k hull, the premium was $4k per year with the only requirement being a two day school given by a local guy and no school the next year (only an IPC) if I fly 100 hours the first year. There were no dual requirements after the two days.
I got into one on similar terms at 700tt
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|