banner
banner

28 Nov 2025, 19:43 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 13:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Yup and that = smaller than PC12.

Do you need to go re read the last 10 posts?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 13:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
After flying a 2013 PC-12NG about 250 hours last year, and getting a feeling for the Pilatus "thing", it's just my gut that the PC-24 will be a record breaking (whatever that means!) success.

The NG consistently leaves me scratching my head with how extremely well it does so many things at the same time. It's an AMAZING airplane.

I think Pilatus will dramatically under promise, and over deliver.

Just my opinion, of course....


You prefer the pc-12 over the B350?

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 14:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/08/11
Posts: 919
Post Likes: +1279
Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
Username Protected wrote:
After flying a 2013 PC-12NG about 250 hours last year, and getting a feeling for the Pilatus "thing", it's just my gut that the PC-24 will be a record breaking (whatever that means!) success.

The NG consistently leaves me scratching my head with how extremely well it does so many things at the same time. It's an AMAZING airplane.

I think Pilatus will dramatically under promise, and over deliver.

Just my opinion, of course....


You prefer the pc-12 over the B350?


Great question! Short answer is NO. I fly the 350, NG, and TBM8 regularly, and get asked such questions a lot.

When I step into a 350, I do have to go back in time, technologically. Less with a Proline, more with an EFIS, but here's two things:

At $4.6MM, in the NG, I still have to press the NRST button and have a plan in the back of my head in case the never quits PT-6 quits...just like I have to in my personal Cessna 182. At 400' AGL, there are places that we don't really want to think about it.

When I depart in the 350, I am sure in the pit of my soul that the flight is going to terminate at an airport, even if it's not the one I set out for.

The other thing is that the PC-12 makes me grit my teeth in the climb a little, while the B350 does this:

Attachment:
IMG_6506.JPG


On the other hand, the Honeywell Primus Apex is my favorite avionics suite, hands down.

I'm not a buyer for either, I'm just a guy who bailed out of real life a few years ago to pursue a mid-life crisis career, after realizing everything else bores the crap out of me. :D

I love them both...but the 350 a little more. I like 2 engines better. But it's not my fuel credit card.

I'm not the least bit sure I've answered your question. :D

And YES!: I WANTED the picture to be sideways. That's a THING now.

Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 14:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/30/09
Posts: 6025
Post Likes: +3389
Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KPWA)
Aircraft: planeless
Bill,

:clap:


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 15:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
I'm not the least bit sure I've answered your question. :D

And YES!: I WANTED the picture to be sideways. That's a THING now.


You did indeed. Much appreciated. I heard you say that for the fuel burn the Pilatus is hands down the best airplane in the world ;-)

Good job on the picture, but I heard it should be sideways to the right :peace:

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 15:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/08/11
Posts: 919
Post Likes: +1279
Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
Quote:
I heard you say that for the fuel burn the Pilatus is hands down the best airplane in the world ;-)


Um, yeah...I guess I did. If your retainer isn't excessive, I'd like to keep you on as interpreter. :D

_________________
NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 15:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
I heard you say that for the fuel burn the Pilatus is hands down the best airplane in the world ;-)


Um, yeah...I guess I did. If your retainer isn't excessive, I'd like to keep you on as interpreter. :D


not a problem whatsoever........

yo también puedo hablar español ;)

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 15:32 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/26/08
Posts: 4627
Post Likes: +1034
Location: Pinehurst, NC (KSOP)
Aircraft: 1965 Bonanza S35
Username Protected wrote:
Five years is a lifetime in aviation.

Computers, yes.

Airplanes, no.

5 years is FAST. Mustang went from announcement to first deliveries in 5 years and it was about the fastest jet development program ever.

Eclipse 500: 8 years announcement to first delivery.

Cirrus SF50: 9 years and counting...

Mike C.



And you didn't even mention Honda!

(wonder if they'll get it out to the masses in under 2 decades? :scratch: )
_________________
dino

"TRUTH is AUTHORITY..... Authority is not Truth"


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 15:37 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/07/08
Posts: 5637
Post Likes: +4374
Location: Fort Worth, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: B200, ex 58P
Username Protected wrote:
the B350 does this:

(picture of VSI showing 2,500 fpm climb)


Wow, 2,500 fpm thru FL 190. Impressive.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 16:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Great question! Short answer is NO. I fly the 350, NG, and TBM8 regularly, and get asked such questions a lot.

When I step into a 350, I do have to go back in time, technologically. Less with a Proline, more with an EFIS, but here's two things:

At $4.6MM, in the NG, I still have to press the NRST button and have a plan in the back of my head in case the never quits PT-6 quits...just like I have to in my personal Cessna 182. At 400' AGL, there are places that we don't really want to think about it.

When I depart in the 350, I am sure in the pit of my soul that the flight is going to terminate at an airport, even if it's not the one I set out for.

The other thing is that the PC-12 makes me grit my teeth in the climb a little, while the B350 does this:

Attachment:
IMG_6506.JPG


On the other hand, the Honeywell Primus Apex is my favorite avionics suite, hands down.

I'm not a buyer for either, I'm just a guy who bailed out of real life a few years ago to pursue a mid-life crisis career, after realizing everything else bores the crap out of me. :D

I love them both...but the 350 a little more. I like 2 engines better. But it's not my fuel credit card.

I'm not the least bit sure I've answered your question. :D

And YES!: I WANTED the picture to be sideways. That's a THING now.

What are dials with the numbers on them?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 16:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/08/11
Posts: 919
Post Likes: +1279
Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
Quote:
What are dials with the numbers on them?


I was afraid that would come up. I will dig up a recurrent manual and respond in a timely fashion...

_________________
NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 16:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
What are dials with the numbers on them?


I was afraid that would come up. I will dig up a recurrent manual and respond in a timely fashion...

OK. Top one is an altimeter. Can't figure out the bottom one.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 16:40 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/18/10
Posts: 3218
Post Likes: +1440
Company: Jeppesen
Location: Denver, CO (KLMO)
Aircraft: 1956 Bonanza G35
The one with 29.92? That's the Kollsman window for setting pressure. @ 18,000 set standard pressure, 29.92".

Edit: I just took that the bait hook line and sinker didn't I?

_________________
ATP, CFII, Bonanza Instructor
ABS Life Member


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 17:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:

Yup and that = smaller than PC12.

Do you need to go re read the last 10 posts?


No need for any rereading.

PC12 330 sq ft
Phenom 325 sq ft
Equals the same, except when you consider the cargo space

Winner phenom 300

Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 takes first flight. Calling JC!
PostPosted: 12 May 2015, 18:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

No need for any rereading.

PC12 330 sq ft
Phenom 325 sq ft
Equals the same, except when you consider the cargo space

Winner phenom 300

Phenom 300 has 325 cubic feet including the exterior baggage. I've sat in both side by side many times. The Phenom 300 is NOT larger than a PC12. Since when was exterior baggage a bonus? Even the new PC24 has interior baggage.

Of course I'd take a Phenom 300 over a PC12. Phenom 300 is $9MM, PC12 is $4.7MM. But they're awful close performance wise considering one of them is twice the price of the other.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 12  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Elite-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.