21 Jun 2025, 13:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 17:37 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/12/07 Posts: 7987 Post Likes: +3509 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: United Technologies has announced that it is selling Sikorski. Hoping that they are not purchased by Cerberus or one of the other [cough] turn-around specialists. How does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese?
_________________ PP, ASEL, Instrument Airplane, A&P Texas Construction Law: http://www.TexasConstructionLaw.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 17:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/09/09 Posts: 3235 Post Likes: +4423 Location: KHII & KREI
Aircraft: RV6A, C182M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: United Technologies has announced that it is selling Sikorski. Hoping that they are not purchased by Cerberus or one of the other [cough] turn-around specialists. How does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese?
Dave
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 17:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/23/09 Posts: 12082 Post Likes: +11624 Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: United Technologies has announced that it is selling Sikorski. Hoping that they are not purchased by Cerberus or one of the other [cough] turn-around specialists. How does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese?
Soykorski
_________________ Life is for living. Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 18:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14349 Post Likes: +16319 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: United Technologies has announced that it is selling Sikorski. Hoping that they are not purchased by Cerberus or one of the other [cough] turn-around specialists. How does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese?
I cannot imagine DoD/DoC approving a sale to China.
_________________ Holoholo …
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 23:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/21/13 Posts: 1029 Post Likes: +669 Company: Water Location: Melbourne, Australia
Aircraft: Renting A36
|
|
Quote: How does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese? Sinokorski.
_________________ When I point a finger at someone, there are three fingers pointing back at me.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 23:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/10 Posts: 4403 Post Likes: +3975
|
|
[quoteHow does one say, "Sikorski" in Chinese?[/quote] [quote[ Soykorski[/quote] No thats Japanese. 
_________________ An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 12 Mar 2015, 23:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/10 Posts: 4403 Post Likes: +3975
|
|
And so, the Dominos begin to fall. Recall that some time ago, Sikorksi bought 51+% of Eclipse Aero, in order to assure its supply chain of engine, avionics and sub-components. If this ball of yarn unwravels, I wonder if Sikorsky will divest itself of EA in order to show profiability. Its also possible that ownership of EA will be transferred to UTC to "clean slate " Sky for sale. Some buyers wouldnt want the EA liability. Enquiring minds. [ I wonder if M. Ciholas is around] 
_________________ An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: For Sale: Sikorski Posted: 13 Mar 2015, 00:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/10 Posts: 4403 Post Likes: +3975
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The EA deal was interesting, Jeff Pino, then sikorsky CEO had just bought himself an eclipse. Felt to me more like ensuring support for his plane than a good business decision. Im sure that was partly the case. (IIRC he got 2 of them, sold one). I retired from UTC and worked in /with S-ski quite a bit. The supply chain management deal was, by far, the deal maker in the EA deal. More than 2/3rds of the plane came from UTC or subsidiaries. also, the engines were the premier platform for that line. If EA goes south (as any small aerospace company can), UTC wont have lost anything. Its all upside at this point. But, then, that the UTC way. Some say they are not indistinguishable from the mafia in their management practices. And I say that with the kindest regard. Its nice to know where you stand with your business partners. 
_________________ An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|