24 May 2025, 23:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 09:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12136 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The use for this plane won't be a private trainer. It is a time builder, especially if you are looking to meet a 1000 hr special ATP requirement. As for batteries, you build this thing like a glider and simply try to stay aloft at minimum power. Put a couple battery swap stations at 2-3 fields and you have a way to get XC time too. Use the DA-40 as an example. Long wing, flies with fairly minimal power. Carries a decent amount.... Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 09:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
Just a side comment: Finding ways for people to meet the ATP requirements cheaply is great on the surface. However, the point of the hour requirements is to have a breath and depth of experience that serves as a foundation for a pilot flying hundreds of passengers in an airliner. I will never believe that circling around in perfect VFR 10 hours a day in a powered glider, while going nowhere, is going to make you anything but a poser.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 09:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20085 Post Likes: +25201 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On the energy density of the Leaf the best lithium based batteries I could find had 250 Wh/kg ratings and the regular ones were around 100-150. Cells can reach 250 WH/kg. Battery packs can't when you add the wiring, safety circuits, and mechanical structure to hold the cells. Quote: But even good production panels are 18-20% efficient and more specialized panels can easily be had in the 30-40%+ range. Link to commercially available solar cells or panels that do 30% or greater. Remember you said they could be had "easily". Quote: As far as battery charging downtime, I don't see why you couldn't engineer it to have fast charge times like a Tesla. Increases weight since you need better cell cooling, heavier wiring, larger circuits pathways. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 09:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12136 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just a side comment: Finding ways for people to meet the ATP requirements cheaply is great on the surface. However, the point of the hour requirements is to have a breath and depth of experience that serves as a foundation for a pilot flying hundreds of passengers in an airliner. I will never believe that circling around in perfect VFR 10 hours a day in a powered glider, while going nowhere, is going to make you anything but a poser. The ATP requirements are a joke for airlines. Congress stepped in and created a completely BS requirement to look like they were doing something. The reality is training is expensive, and the logistical burden to have pilots and airlines actually do truly effective training would be complex and likely cost as just as much. For example, a smarter regulation would have created regions of the country where you must train and be certified to deal with specific conditions that caused the Colgan crash. e.g. You cannot take a pilot that learned to fly in Arizona and make them a pilot flying around Boston in Winter without some ice training. But this is way to complicated, to many variables, how do you test it..... For Congress to actually get correct. So they went the easy way. So for now, the industry is looking for ways to complete the checklist as cheaply as possible. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17215 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The use for this plane won't be a private trainer. It is a time builder, especially if you are looking to meet a 1000 hr special ATP requirement. As for batteries, you build this thing like a glider and simply try to stay aloft at minimum power. Put a couple battery swap stations at 2-3 fields and you have a way to get XC time too. "Time Builder"? I have flown for a looooong time. I never once improved my skills sitting behind a yoke or stick watching the clock. Like sitting behind an autopilot in IFR weather, useless as far as a skill improver. More benefit from ten current approaches than a thousand hours of "riding along with George". I have known scores of 15,000 hour ag pilots who couldn't survive ten minutes in the clouds and highly skilled instrument pilots who couldn't taxi a Cub to the runway without taking out taxiway lights. The "skills" of flying are many and varied and barely related in some cases. Any "airplane" with capabilities as limited as this electric bird will offer a modicum of useful learning experiences and even less practical utility. The hype, promotion, and failed promise of the regeneration of aviation training as a result of LSA's is an example of "high hopes and low reality". At this point, electrics simply fall into step behind that last great promise. The technology of electrics is evolving at an exponential rate, but as for practical use in airplanes, it is still "beyond our vision". On a more positive note, they did find all those buried Spitfires didn't they? Jgreen 
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20085 Post Likes: +25201 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Use the DA-40 as an example. Long wing, flies with fairly minimal power. Takes 90 HP (67 KW) to keep the DA40 flying at the best possible speed. 2 hours of that requires a 134 KWH pack. At 200 WH/kg pack energy density, a so far unachievable number, that is 670 kg, 1,480 pounds. The present empty weight of a DA40 is 1,800 lbs. Doesn't work. And that was cruising at exactly the minimum drag airspeed. Do anything else and you get less duration. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7094 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This article is 8 months old. http://www.wired.com/2014/07/chip-yates ... e-records/And that was a high power motor and could almost make it two hours in a conservative cruise. Next, in the SR20, you have 56 gallons of gas and an engine that weighs about 420lbs including accessories. That gives you 336+420lbs to replace with a low weight electric motor and batteries. This is very doable for a part 23 trainer. Tim Great post Tim. I'm a dreamer. Funny part was I looked at the article I posted, saw the picture, saw the airplane and started to dream about the possibilities........an engineer I am not 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just a side comment: Finding ways for people to meet the ATP requirements cheaply is great on the surface. However, the point of the hour requirements is to have a breath and depth of experience that serves as a foundation for a pilot flying hundreds of passengers in an airliner. I will never believe that circling around in perfect VFR 10 hours a day in a powered glider, while going nowhere, is going to make you anything but a poser. The ATP requirements are a joke for airlines. Congress stepped in and created a completely BS requirement to look like they were doing something. The reality is training is expensive, and the logistical burden to have pilots and airlines actually do truly effective training would be complex and likely cost as just as much. For example, a smarter regulation would have created regions of the country where you must train and be certified to deal with specific conditions that caused the Colgan crash. e.g. You cannot take a pilot that learned to fly in Arizona and make them a pilot flying around Boston in Winter without some ice training. But this is way to complicated, to many variables, how do you test it..... For Congress to actually get correct. So they went the easy way. So for now, the industry is looking for ways to complete the checklist as cheaply as possible. Tim
I think we agree. If someone spent 1500 hours flying a piston single around the entire country in all weather, I would venture to say that they would be a pretty solid pilot. In terms of meeting the hour requirements cheaply, the real answer, the only answer in my mind is a sim.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12136 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Use the DA-40 as an example. Long wing, flies with fairly minimal power. Takes 90 HP (67 KW) to keep the DA40 flying at the best possible speed. 2 hours of that requires a 134 KWH pack. At 200 WH/kg pack energy density, a so far unachievable number, that is 670 kg, 1,480 pounds. The present empty weight of a DA40 is 1,800 lbs. Doesn't work. And that was cruising at exactly the minimum drag airspeed. Do anything else and you get less duration. Mike C.
Mike,
Where do you get the number of 90HP? (Curious, I could not find it) I do not think we are there yet with electric. But I also do not think we are that far away from a possible electric trainer.
And here is one available now: http://www.pipistrel-usa.com/models/taurus-electro.html
Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 11:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20085 Post Likes: +25201 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Where do you get the number of 90HP? Calculated from climb rate, gross weight, and horsepower. The best climb rate is achieved at the minimum drag airspeed. This leaves the most power left over for climb. For the DA40, the gross weight is 2,645 lbs and the climb rate is 1,120 FPM. To raise 2,645 lbs up 1,120 ft in 1 minute takes 90 HP (1 HP is 550 ft-lbs/second). The DA40 has a 180 HP engine. 90 HP is being used for climb, 90 HP is left, that is what it takes to fly at Vy (which is min drag) and remain at altitude. If you fly slower or faster than Vy, it takes more power to fly level. The above doesn't take into account prop efficiency, but close enough. DA40 numbers from Wikipedia page. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 11:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12136 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Where do you get the number of 90HP? Calculated from climb rate, gross weight, and horsepower. The best climb rate is achieved at the minimum drag airspeed. This leaves the most power left over for climb. For the DA40, the gross weight is 2,645 lbs and the climb rate is 1,120 FPM. To raise 2,645 lbs up 1,120 ft in 1 minute takes 90 HP (1 HP is 550 ft-lbs/second). The DA40 has a 180 HP engine. 90 HP is being used for climb, 90 HP is left, that is what it takes to fly at Vy (which is min drag) and remain at altitude. If you fly slower or faster than Vy, it takes more power to fly level. The above doesn't take into account prop efficiency, but close enough. DA40 numbers from Wikipedia page. Mike C.
Mike,
How does the 747-8 fly then? Max weight: 975,000 lbs Thrust: 66,500 lbs per engine. 266,000 Total.
Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 11:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/11 Posts: 900 Post Likes: +170 Location: Jupiter,Florida
Aircraft: Bonanza F33A N329C
|
|
For anyone who has read my earlier posts on the advantages of renewable energy may be surprised by this one. Static solar arrays are efficient and effective. One must consider, however the latitude of the array so that it may be tilted to the angle of max efficiency and must account for the distance from the equator due to light lost passing through the atmosphere. Clouds, haze, etc. are considerations as well. Hard to do in aviation. I can't for the life of me see the usefulness of PV cells on an aircraft- particularly those used to recharge a battery bank to power the engine. Because of w/b concerns, the batteries would have to be at the CG, meaning that occupants would have to sit above or below considerable weight. I'm not sure how much of this weight could be placed in the wings if any at all. My belief as electric power is more frequently proposed for untethered vehicles is that, for many of the reasons listed in preceding posts, it is currently unrealistic. Solar, wind and falling water generated electricity has many benefits which are not currently being exploited fully, but untethered locomotion is not yet one of them. Automobiles are progressing, but aviation is still a dream.
_________________ Cappy Swope
CARRYING THEIR BAG DOESN'T MAKE YOU A MEMBER OF THE CLUB
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 12:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7094 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For anyone who has read my earlier posts on the advantages of renewable energy may be surprised by this one. Static solar arrays are efficient and effective. One must consider, however the latitude of the array so that it may be tilted to the angle of max efficiency and must account for the distance from the equator due to light lost passing through the atmosphere. Clouds, haze, etc. are considerations as well. Hard to do in aviation. I can't for the life of me see the usefulness of PV cells on an aircraft- particularly those used to recharge a battery bank to power the engine. Because of w/b concerns, the batteries would have to be at the CG, meaning that occupants would have to sit above or below considerable weight. I'm not sure how much of this weight could be placed in the wings if any at all. My belief as electric power is more frequently proposed for untethered vehicles is that, for many of the reasons listed in preceding posts, it is currently unrealistic. Solar, wind and falling water generated electricity has many benefits which are not currently being exploited fully, but untethered locomotion is not yet one of them. Automobiles are progressing, but aviation is still a dream. Did not see your earlier post. In re-reading the article from my original post I see the pv cells on the wings. I was more excited about the possibilities of electric airplanes than the actually charging said airplane with pv cells on the wings. The possibilities (if we put Mike C in charge of research) of electric propulsion are exciting.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: It's coming and it will definitely help GA Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 12:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/21/12 Posts: 1659 Post Likes: +526 Location: SW USA
Aircraft: Lowly renter
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just a side comment: Finding ways for people to meet the ATP requirements cheaply is great on the surface. However, the point of the hour requirements is to have a breath and depth of experience that serves as a foundation for a pilot flying hundreds of passengers in an airliner. I will never believe that circling around in perfect VFR 10 hours a day in a powered glider, while going nowhere, is going to make you anything but a poser. The ATP requirements are a joke for airlines. Congress stepped in and created a completely BS requirement to look like they were doing something. The reality is training is expensive, and the logistical burden to have pilots and airlines actually do truly effective training would be complex and likely cost as just as much. For example, a smarter regulation would have created regions of the country where you must train and be certified to deal with specific conditions that caused the Colgan crash. e.g. You cannot take a pilot that learned to fly in Arizona and make them a pilot flying around Boston in Winter without some ice training. But this is way to complicated, to many variables, how do you test it..... For Congress to actually get correct. So they went the easy way. So for now, the industry is looking for ways to complete the checklist as cheaply as possible. Tim
I like that idea a lot. Earning a 121 PIC slot would require certain boxes to be checked. This would probably just lead to more people lying about their experience though. Happens quite often already.
_________________ Signature intentionally left blank. Do not read this.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|