banner
banner

16 Dec 2025, 12:21 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2014, 23:25 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/13/08
Posts: 2418
Post Likes: +649
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Aircraft: 260B Comanche
Username Protected wrote:
I built and completed an RV and flew it all over the country and beyond. To answer your question Arlen I'd have to say that I don't think so. I just don't see enough people committing the time and perseverance to complete an airplane for it save the GA flying world. For example I worked four tens during the years that I built and got in three solid eight plus hour days a week in addition to a couple of hours in the evenings about twice a week. Working like this it took me 3 1/2 years to complete my airplane.

While it is proving out that buyers will pony up for a flying RV, there just isn't enough to be had if people started dumping their factory built planes in mass to buy one.


Bryan,
Why did you sell the RV and buy a Vtail?


Edited. I always wanted one. :peace: Sending you a PM.

Last edited on 06 Aug 2014, 23:41, edited 3 times in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2014, 23:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/08/13
Posts: 762
Post Likes: +181
Company: Gene's Mountain View Auto
Location: 4B0 Upstate NY/ VRB Florida
Aircraft: 67 Debonair C33A
I don't think the experimental market can/ will save GA in the long term. There's NO arguing the fact that dollar for dollar an experimental offers more....unless you need 4 seats. Innovation, performance, customization, cost, AND owner repairs....even annuals IF you built it. The problem lies in the HUGE time commitment to build it, and further gets complicated in the fact that you still need to fly in the interim, which means rental.....which means cost and time.Now, some of this can be circumvented by simply buying a completed homebuilt....and there are many out there. BUT.....the good ones aren't going cheap ( nor should they) and now your back to another problem. YOU didn't build it.......so unless your a mechanic you'll need to pay someone to do it for you, and still pay for an annual. Some savings yes.....but no huge epiphany found there.
GA is going downhill because.......COST, and the world is a different place. Sadly, us airplane "nuts" are a dying breed. We've lost a big frontier that used to make little boys look up at the sky and dream......
I know, because I was one of them..... :sad:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 00:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/27/10
Posts: 2155
Post Likes: +533
To quote Tom Gresham:
Quote:
Omniscience. It comes in handy.
. . . and paraphrasing his recommendation to buy in 5 pound cans at Spruce, I am just not a very good shopper, because I haven't found the aisle it's on.

As a result I'm not smart enough to tell just where GA is going, but the journey will be much better if we have a Big Tent. (That's for you Nate, we're still buds)

I have NEVER flown an airplane I didn't like, period. Some more than others perhaps, but all were a joy.

If I were to "inherit" a Cirrus, Saratoga, Archer, Mooney, RV, or any Cessna would I fly and enjoy it . . . You bet.

Sitting in a foreign land with my plane a half a world away, reminds me of how much I'd like to go out and just do some slow flight, stalls and approaches.

I keep hoping GA doesn't need "saving" but then I'm short on the omniscient stuff.

BTW Arlen neet thread, 'cuzz it gets people thinking.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 00:16 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6656
Post Likes: +5969
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
No, I don't think so.

Too much hassle to build, too much liability and not enough variety. I'm basically into flying so that I can travel and avoid going by airlines at a time and cost effective way (ok, not cost effective.. :liar: ). There are no homebuilt alternatives for me - twin, 6 pass, pressurised, FIKI. The experimental kits that are sold are basically geared for the tinkerer with a two car garage and hence they're limited in their size and capability.

And has anyone tried to fly internationally with an experimental? You need an exception from every country for non-ICAO compliant aircraft, pretty much. My European tour I want to do next summer to visit family and friends would be a logistical nightmare in an experimental.

I'm hoping the rewrite of FAR part 23 will allow more freedom to us with certified aircraft for retrofits and avionics so as to close the gap towards experimentals. I'm very jealous of the avionics and easy retrofits you guys can use. As for the future: I'm actually pretty optimistic. Electric aircraft has the potential to revolutionise aviation and make it a lot cheaper, less complex and better performing. But until that electric PC12 that'll cost $100K new to buy arrives, or the electric fanjet that looks like a Phenom and costs $200K, then I'll stick with the certified for now.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 00:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/06/12
Posts: 662
Post Likes: +225
Location: Paso Robles, California
Aircraft: 1958 J-35 Bonanza
I can't help but be pessimistic about the future of general aviation. The EAA likes to brag about all the thousands of young people they have taken up for rides. I wonder though, how many of them will actually continue flying, as a career or even just for fun? The biggest problem of course is cost but another problem is the general publics perception of what we do and who we are. This year I'm faced with an engine overhaul, an anual inspection, insurance and property tax. On top of that I just found out I'm going to be a GRANDFATHER soon. :eek: :D :thumbup: :cheers:

_________________
Maintain thy airspeed lest the ground arise and smyte thee.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 06:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/23/11
Posts: 14722
Post Likes: +6862
Location: Frederick, MD
Aircraft: V35A TC
Can amateur built experimental aircraft save GA?....I don't think so, but, it certainly won't hurt GA.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but, I believe almost as many experimental aircraft are registered each year as production built aircraft. That certainly is helping..... :woot: :thumbup:

_________________
Views represented here are my own.....and do not in anyway reflect my employer's position.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 06:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/17/08
Posts: 6612
Post Likes: +14815
Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
Username Protected wrote:
Finally saw an Evolution in person today. Very cool but VERY small. Backseat was teeny.
Why no bigger experimentals for 2014 sized people?


Did you get in the back seat? I thjnk it is very comfortable and I'm 6'1" & 220#.... I love the Evolution! What a machine....

_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
MCW
Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 06:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20385
Post Likes: +25536
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, I believe almost as many experimental aircraft are registered each year as production built aircraft. That certainly is helping..... :woot: :thumbup:

In the piston plane realm, Richard VanGrunsven's company (Vans) sees more new (E-AB) planes flying each year than Cirrus, Beech, and Diamond - combined.

I think these big numbers of new planes are helping to keep GA going..

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 07:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20385
Post Likes: +25536
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Adam, you make some good points. A couple comments, however...

Username Protected wrote:
No, I don't think so.

Too much hassle to build, too much liability and not enough variety. I'm basically into flying so that I can travel and avoid going by airlines at a time and cost effective way (ok, not cost effective.. :liar: ). There are no homebuilt alternatives for me - twin, 6 pass, pressurised, FIKI.

Some enjoy the build process. That wasn't for me. There are hundreds that come on to the market each year as finished products. If you need pressurized FIKI 6-place, then you're mostly stuck with expensive certified planes.

Quote:
And has anyone tried to fly internationally with an experimental? You need an exception from every country for non-ICAO compliant aircraft, pretty much. My European tour I want to do next summer to visit family and friends would be a logistical nightmare in an experimental.

I don't know about Europe, though there are many RVs that fly there. I do know that it's no big deal to fly to the Bahamas in an E-AB plane.


Quote:
I'm hoping the rewrite of FAR part 23 will allow more freedom to us with certified aircraft for retrofits and avionics so as to close the gap towards experimentals. I'm very jealous of the avionics and easy retrofits you guys can use. .

I agree completely. The cost of avionics for the E-AB is about one-fourth that of certified. I'm not holding my breath, however, while waiting on the Feds.

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 07:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20385
Post Likes: +25536
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
.....by simply buying a completed homebuilt....and there are many out there. BUT.....the good ones aren't going cheap ( nor should they) and now your back to another problem. YOU didn't build it.......so unless your a mechanic you'll need to pay someone to do it for you, and still pay for an annual. Some savings yes.....but no huge epiphany found there.

Gene,

The rules about who can work on an E-AB plane are actually pretty relaxed. I didn't build mine. But, I could do all the work on mine that I want to do; an A&P (no IA needed) must sign off the Annual. That's all.

So, trading money savings for one's own labor is an option. More importantly, at least for me, is that I don't have to buy an FAA-certified starter or alternator or battery or even engine. I had my alternator overhauled at the local auto electric shop: $90.

So, savings on parts is another big player here.

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 12160
Post Likes: +3545
Aircraft: C55
My Glasair is almost out of paint. 215 knots on 14 GPH. Full dual screens with digital autopilot and SVT. Everything new $150k.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 12160
Post Likes: +3545
Aircraft: C55
Adam makes a good point. If you want a 6-place pressurized twin it won't be an experimental; however, 20 years from now it won't be anything piston driven. Once Dukes, Aerostars, 421s, etc get too old and too expensive to run you will be buying a King Air, Pilatus, or something like it is you want a cabin class airplane. The Lancair Evolution is an absolute screamer and a nice plane. For $1M you get a lot of plane. Might fill in a few gaps of those exiting the pressurized twin arena.

I have owned a lot of planes. They are all really good deals right now. Still tough to beat a Colemill Baron and a Duke is a steal is you don't mind feeding it.

I think the experimental market is going to get stronger every year. On our field alone 20% of the aircraft are experimental or LSA and they are about 30-40% of the planes actually flying.

_________________
The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/19/08
Posts: 3681
Post Likes: +634
Location: Vermont
Aircraft: F33A TAT 550
A guy on my field calls them DBAs: Death by Aviation.
And he flies a Waco.

_________________
Happy landings!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Yep, you need healthy FBO's to keep the smaller airports going and just three tanks of fuel from your Pilatus is about a years worth of gas sales from an RV-6.

What are you saying? How does an airplane that uses no gas helping FBO's?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation?
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think so, Jason.

If we don't develop more pilots, and if they don't buy and fly airplanes, and if Avgas goes up a couple more dollars, then the Pilatuses and Embraers of the world won't be enough to keep FBOs open. GA needs many thousands of Avgas-burning planes hopping from airport to airport...

New pilots and charter ops are at an all time high. Where are all these Cirri, Pilatus, TBM and Embrares going? They're selling all they can build.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.sarasota.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.