07 Jun 2025, 15:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 16:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3307 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So do we have a majority consensus that the 421 is superior to the Duke? Other than a bunch of mumbo-jumbo about battery cars and flux capacitors, that is what I'm getting after 15 pages. If cabin comfort is important to you then yes. A quick tour of both cabins will answer this question in about 2 sec. If you into pure sex appeal, I don't think the 421 can even begin to compete with a Duke.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 16:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13470 Post Likes: +7555 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No, what you have is that the 421 has a superior cabin and more baggage room. It is slower on the same fuel, does not handle as nice, and costs 3x more. That is the skinny. Or faster on same fuel.....depends on who you ask. The rest I'll agree with.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 18:56 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7359 Post Likes: +5024 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No, what you have is that the 421 has a superior cabin and more baggage room. It is slower on the same fuel, does not handle as nice, and costs 3x more. That is the skinny. Or faster on same fuel.....depends on who you ask. The rest I'll agree with.
Also the 421C has better short field ability and a toilet in the back. Direct Operating cost is about the same as the Duke. The Duke is less to buy for a reason. The Duke is considered better looking , but looks didn't sell very well. Cessna 421 out sold the Duke 2 to 1.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 19:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/10/13 Posts: 882 Post Likes: +517 Location: Kcir
Aircraft: C90
|
|
Thank god this post is back on tract. I don't give a damn about electric cars right now. I am trying to decide what, if any twin, I need to buy with my newly acquired multi rating.
Come on guys, especially those of you with the good, bad or ugly experience of twin ownership, keep the debate going. Some of us are actually listening...about airplanes anyway.
Regards,
Mark
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 19:30 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7359 Post Likes: +5024 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thank god this post is back on tract. I don't give a damn about electric cars right now. I am trying to decide what, if any twin, I need to buy with my newly acquired multi rating.
Come on guys, especially those of you with the good, bad or ugly experience of twin ownership, keep the debate going. Some of us are actually listening...about airplanes anyway.
Regards,
Mark Mark, it is a good thing you are taking your time. There are good,bad and ugly facts about all of them. A lot of things factor into what you will buy and "like " after the purchase.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 19:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12151 Post Likes: +3041 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thank god this post is back on tract. I don't give a damn about electric cars right now. I am trying to decide what, if any twin, I need to buy with my newly acquired multi rating.
Come on guys, especially those of you with the good, bad or ugly experience of twin ownership, keep the debate going. Some of us are actually listening...about airplanes anyway.
Regards,
Mark Mark, It will come down to three things. -- Budget. Both acquisition and operation. Acquisition will be the smaller part over time, but does affect what you get. -- Mission. e.g. Carry four a 1000NM non-stop is not going to happen in a Piper Seminole. -- Emotions. Could be wife's opinion on looks or comfort or... Could be yours on which one flies better.... My suggestion, go fly a few and take your wife on a trip or two in some and see what you like. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 20:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 163 Post Likes: +21 Company: Legion Air Location: Northern Virginia
|
|
speaking of sex appeal, I think both Jim Lovell and Eugene Cernan own and fly 421s. Probably for the poor fuel economy, cramped cabin and, of course, the luck of potty on top of those Saturn V rockets.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 20:16 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7359 Post Likes: +5024 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Also the 421C has better short field ability and a toilet in the back. Direct Operating cost is about the same as the Duke. The Duke is less to buy for a reason. The Duke is considered better looking , but looks didn't sell very well. Cessna 421 out sold the Duke 2 to 1.[/quote] so what is the short field capability of the 421C? How short of a grass strip can it handle? ( 2,300?)[/quote] 421C will easily use 2300 of pavement depending on 4 things. 1. You are not at Max gross. 2. The density altitude is low 3. The pilots ability 4. No obstructions close to the ends of the runway Grass is different. Depends on how tall the grass is, how wet or soft the surface is. I have never tried 2300 of grass but think you would need about 3,000 with the same 4 conditions .
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 20:31 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5755 Post Likes: +7145 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
1. light ( 3/4 fuel or less and 2 people on board) 2. short grass, very firm ground 3. DA under 2,000' 4. assume I know what I am doing. ( big assumption I know  ) all this considered, what say you?
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 27 Jun 2014, 20:35 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7359 Post Likes: +5024 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1. light ( 3/4 fuel or less and 2 people on board) 2. short grass, very firm ground 3. DA under 2,000' 4. assume I know what I am doing. ( big assumption I know  ) all this considered, what say you? What about obstructions? A 421 with RSTOL would be better long term under those conditions.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 28 Jun 2014, 11:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I love my Baron but after flying the 414, having the extra two seats and potty are a huge upgrade. When you can actually belt 8 it gives huge flexibility without having to move to a king air or a pilatus. 421 is way ahead than the Duke....way ahead Exactly! If you need the cabin you buy the 400 series. If you only have 4-5 people and want a wonderful airplane for 1/3 the money you buy the Duke. With 8 people you are not going very far and you are taking zero bags anyway. The 400 series are good planes, but they are nothing special at the price they are at. Now, Teslas are pigs and will not run LOP.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|