banner
banner

09 Jun 2025, 06:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 538 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 36  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2014, 23:30 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 6828
Post Likes: +5012
Location: Portland, OR (KHIO)
Aircraft: 1962 Bonanza P35
Username Protected wrote:
:popcorn:

Wait for it...


Does the same rule apply to turbines as pistons, two engines = engine failure twice as likely :D :duck:





:popcorn:

_________________
Paul
I heart flying

ABS Lifetime Member
EAA Lifetime Member


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 06:26 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/12/11
Posts: 6177
Post Likes: +2338
Location: Bedford, MA (KBED)
Aircraft: 1992 Bonanza A36
Jason's Pilatus was the first plane I took my shoes off before entering....totally gorgeous airplane. Been in both the King air and the Pilatus but don't find it a useful comparison. A better comparison from my perspective is to compare it with a TBM. Again personal perspective, I love the TBM but it does not have the ruggedness of the Pilatus nor as great a useful. My point of comparison was 700c.

The King Air is an awesome twin and best of breed in turbo props in my estimation. It's the choice when you decided on twin with inherent operating costs.

Now back to reality...I won't ever own any of these planes till I get off my a&& and start my own business! Until and if I ever get there, I am officially a gawking tire kicker :drool:

_________________
Best Regards,

Kevin McNamara


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 07:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I do love the PC12, it's well made and has awesome utility.

That said, I just got a hangar that I am sharing with a guy with a TBM700, and we can fit both airplanes in it (plus my 25' boat on trailer), and yet can't fit a single PC12 in it even when it's otherwise empty... So occasionally there are downsides to the hugeness.

But it's occasional.

That concern wasn't on my list and never will be.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 07:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

They look like they pass, but I'm confused, I picture JC girls as the types who would fit in the front door of the PC12, but they're using the back? :D

Haha. That's funny.


I tend to like'em "big".


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 07:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Well, I see others have already responded, but here's my $0.02:

The 350 is basically a "fill the seats and fill the tanks" airplane. Counting the cockpit seats, that usually means 11 people.

You have about 5.5 hours duration at normal cruise at 290 KTAS. That comes out to be 1,700 nm, no (or little) reserve.

Conservatively it's 290 KTAS and burning on average about 100 gph.

Two pilots? Nope. Definitely single-pilot so long as the PIC has that authority...which most have.

My exceedingly little time in a PC-12 leads me to like it a lot! "You pay your money; you take your choice!"

PC12 has seats for 11 also. It's also a fill the tanks and seats airplane. I cruise 275 and have 7 hours of duration.

A 350 will use twice the fuel for the same mission. If I'm burning gas like that, I'll take an extra 150 knots in a Phenom 300.

Of the numbers you posted on the 350....... What part is the "step up"?


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 09:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/11
Posts: 2755
Post Likes: +2186
Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler
Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
Ok few points, where is your 11th seat? We have 10, do they take out the bathroom? The NG will do 275kts or 7 hours, it simply won't do both. To even get 275, you have to be at ISA or cooler, in the low 20s, and sucking down around 450lbs hr. That's 5 hours with an IFR reserve. It's not a fill the tanks and seats airplane either 1140lbs to spread over 10 seats is 114lbs per passenger. Gymnastics team, maybe. The phenom will not hold as much as a 350. It's like asking someone why they bought a Ccaravan instead of a PC12, because it fit a mission. Granted on a given trip the the phenom will go faster and burn less but if you have more stuff than the airplane can legally carry, all those capabilities are useless...

_________________
The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 09:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/11/14
Posts: 582
Post Likes: +25
Location: KCOE/KSFF
I think it speaks volumes for the 12 when a majority of the Medevac's have shed their KA's and use the 12's exclusively...


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 09:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Ok few points, where is your 11th seat? We have 10, do they take out the bathroom? The NG will do 275kts or 7 hours, it simply won't do both. To even get 275, you have to be at ISA or cooler, in the low 20s, and sucking down around 450lbs hr. That's 5 hours with an IFR reserve. It's not a fill the tanks and seats airplane either 1140lbs to spread over 10 seats is 114lbs per passenger. Gymnastics team, maybe. The phenom will not hold as much as a 350. It's like asking someone why they bought a Ccaravan instead of a PC12, because it fit a mission. Granted on a given trip the the phenom will go faster and burn less but if you have more stuff than the airplane can legally carry, all those capabilities are useless...

I ask again....... What part of the 350 is a "step up"?

I've done several "cost to coast" non stop in the PC12 with 7 plus bags on board.

Can the KA350 do this? Yes. But on a lot more gas. So where is the "step up" part?

I'd rather get a Phenom 300. It's over 150 knots faster, the same size as the Pilatus and goes to 45K'.

What is the max number of PAX any "owner operator" ever WANTS to carry? I'm not a charter outfit. This is why my comparison emphasized SINGLE PILOT. I'll carry 3 couples happily. That's fun. Any more and they can go fly commercial. I don't want 11 people on my airplane. Who does? Even for business, I haul 8 all the time..... I don't want anymore. I tell them to take commercial even if it means me paying for it. I just don't want that many people on my airplane. It doesn't benefit me to be everyone's charter service.

Even if I had a Challenger 300 right now. Yup, I'll haul 6 or 7 with me..... Any more than that and "ya'll can just meet me there". I'm not your free ride. This is my airplane. It's use is to benefit my life and make ME happy.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 09:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8869
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
I think it speaks volumes for the 12 when a majority of the Medevac's have shed their KA's and use the 12's exclusively...


It speaks to the tighter reimbursement climate in recent years.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 10:43 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
It speaks to the tighter reimbursement climate in recent years.

It speaks to...... New airplane designs do more on less. A Phenom 300 burns less gas and goes 450 knots.

It's new technology. It's in all these new jets.

A Phenom 300 on a program runs about $500-$600 per hour for MX. At 450 knots and 110 gallons per hour I'll bet it costs the same to run a Phenom 300 as it does my Pilatus.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 11:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8869
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
It speaks to the tighter reimbursement climate in recent years.

It speaks to...... New airplane designs do more on less. A Phenom 300 burns less gas and goes 450 knots.

It's new technology. It's in all these new jets.

A Phenom 300 on a program runs about $500-$600 per hour for MX. At 450 knots and 110 gallons per hour I'll bet it costs the same to run a Phenom 300 as it does my Pilatus.


Not for the 100-300nm hops that make up the bulk of domestic inter-hospital business.
Transplant and repatriation sees longer stages but tends to see low utilization. With capital as the dominant expense there are still plenty of older Lears and Citation Bravos in that field.

Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 11:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Not for the 100-300nm hops that make up the bulk of domestic inter-hospital business.
Transplant and repatriation sees longer stages but tends to see low utilization. With capital as the dominant expense there are still plenty of older Lears and Citation Bravos in that field.

Hey that's great. Has nothing to do with me or probably anyone else on BT.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 11:49 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/10
Posts: 2025
Post Likes: +902
Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
why is it we always have to rationalize with $$$? Can't we just do w.t.h. we want because that's what makes us happy, or it's what we want to do for any reason the suits us?

JC looks it from a "it gets me where I'm going on half the burn" as the competition. In his world that's what's important because he can take his harem with him! :bow: I'm envious on both accounts.

Others have to point out that comparing the 12 to 350, or EM 300 isn't a logical comparison. Who cares? The only things that matter are those that the poor SOB paying all the bills is getting what they want, and feel good about it. That's it. There is nothing else.


Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 12:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8869
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Not for the 100-300nm hops that make up the bulk of domestic inter-hospital business.
Transplant and repatriation sees longer stages but tends to see low utilization. With capital as the dominant expense there are still plenty of older Lears and Citation Bravos in that field.

Hey that's great. Has nothing to do with me or probably anyone else on BT.


Why did you comment on the inter-hospital transfer business then ?

A fellow BTer operates 4 KA200s for my current employer. Their department hasn't slurped the PC12 kool-aid quite yet ;) .

Top

 Post subject: Re: That PC12 is biiiiiiiig.
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2014, 13:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/11
Posts: 2755
Post Likes: +2186
Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler
Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
Username Protected wrote:
I ask again....... What part of the 350 is a "step up"?

I've done several "cost to coast" non stop in the PC12 with 7 plus bags on board.

Can the KA350 do this? Yes. But on a lot more gas. So where is the "step up" part?

I'd rather get a Phenom 300. It's over 150 knots faster, the same size as the Pilatus and goes to 45K'.

What is the max number of PAX any "owner operator" ever WANTS to carry? I'm not a charter outfit. This is why my comparison emphasized SINGLE PILOT. I'll carry 3 couples happily. That's fun. Any more and they can go fly commercial. I don't want 11 people on my airplane. Who does? Even for business, I haul 8 all the time..... I don't want anymore. I tell them to take commercial even if it means me paying for it. I just don't want that many people on my airplane. It doesn't benefit me to be everyone's charter service.

Even if I had a Challenger 300 right now. Yup, I'll haul 6 or 7 with me..... Any more than that and "ya'll can just meet me there". I'm not your free ride. This is my airplane. It's use is to benefit my life and make ME happy.


Ok I'll bite. Define "step up" is it speed, range, carrying capability, take off/ landing abilities? It's up to each owner to decide for themselves.

Every owner operator is different, what if he's an older guy with kids and grand kids. Needs to move six couples and some kids. Each mission is different.

What if a second engine makes sense to him? I know the statistics don't support the argument but he's the one stroking the check..

Airplane purchases are not always based on logic, but more on desire. My mission could be filled with a 172, but I wanna go fast and look really good doing it, so I have a faster model V tail.


Attachment:
image.jpg


Taken just an hour ago... max cruise fl 230 a little warm but 400lbs an hour at 262TAS. Book for this condition is 407 lbs and 260TAS. You burn 500lbs first hour plus 500lbs IFR reserve, leaves 1700lbs, 400lbs an hour plus your first hour leaves you at just over 4 hours in this configuration. Go higher to burn less fuel and you go slower, go lower to go faster and you burn more fuel... Plane only holds 2700lbs....

If you do coast to coast with seven and bags, it can be done with smaller people easily, but you'll need a serious tail wind or cruise at lower power, no winds max cruise power you're not going non stop coast to coast.

Phenom 300 holds 8 people and is a nice move from the NG as long as he can give up two seats, PC24 is better, but not available yet. Everyone is different in their needs and desires. If the guy has millions to spend wants two engines and wants to haul his devout catholic family around, more power to him.

PS we're is the 11th seat in executive configured NG?


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.


Last edited on 26 Jun 2014, 18:03, edited 1 time in total.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 538 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 36  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.