19 May 2025, 14:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 10:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/10 Posts: 13389 Post Likes: +2344 Company: Stratz Farms Location: Fond du Lac, WI & Spruce Creek, FL
Aircraft: 1992 Bonanza F33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Aerodynamics allways works. I am carefully looking at my children trying to decide which one I am going to sell for one of these  How many children do you have Florian? You might be able to get the premium model. 
_________________ Greg Stratz Stratz Farms ABS Past President
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Aerodynamics allways works. I am carefully looking at my children trying to decide which one I am going to sell for one of these  How many children do you have Florian? You might be able to get the premium model. 
Not nearly enough for something like this, I also really like them both :-) . I guess a 700C1 will have to do one of these days.
Socata and Cirrus demonstrate that you can innovate within a given airframe. Someone mentioned that there would be a big announcement from Socata this week, they weren't lying.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3307 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
I've been waiting for this announcement for awhile now... I thought I had it bad for TBMs already. This makes it even worse. I really think they have a winner here. Per mile efficiency in these birds is really quite exceptional and very difficult to beat. I too feel strongly about losing $$ in depreciation. Even with some potential tax benefits, I about vomit when I see guys losing $250-$500k / yr in depreciation on their light jets. I couldn't look myself in the mirror knowing I was flushing $20-40K PER MONTH down the toilet in depreciation expenses. I work too hard for my $$ to do something like that. Perhaps when I work less hard for my $$ it won't bother me as badly... However, when you look at used TBMs and used PC12's, the market clearly favors them and they are holding their value VERY well compared Mustangs, CJ's, etc. Even still, $3.71M (which likely means closer to $4M equipped) for a SETP is a big pill to swallow. Perhaps the C2's will come down in price after enough 850's and 900's hit the used market. 
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Perhaps the C2's will come down in price after enough 850's and 900's hit the used market.  Nothing seems to affect the price of C2s  . I believe they carry more than the 850 and use less fuel to do it (at a slightly lower speed). I wonder how the useful load/range profile will come out in the 900. For example they added the pilot door as standard (30-50lb) and winglets usually mean weight. They may save a couple of pounds on the composite prop (what did they have before, a 4 blade metal ?).
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13405 Post Likes: +7485 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here's an interesting comparison of depreciation of TBM850 to Mustangs from Vref. Clearly the market favors TBM850 over the Mustangs. I don't have data on the PC12 but my guess is the data is even better:  And there is my point. The first guy takes a 15% whack in a year. The next guy can own for 5 years and only lose a few percent vs. new. This is almost universal unless the supply is limited. Nothing new here....
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6720 Post Likes: +5755 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
Say you had a few million. This vs an Eclipse. What would you choose? I know the eclipse is less. Impressive airplane. Pilatus still wins in the utility category.
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 11:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12132 Post Likes: +3031 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Say you had a few million. This vs an Eclipse. What would you choose? I know the eclipse is less. Impressive airplane. Pilatus still wins in the utility category. If I had that much money, I would pick the Eclipse. Consider it a midlife crisis. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 12:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Say you had a few million. This vs an Eclipse. The Eclipse is in a different bracket as all of them are used at this time. 2mil to spend or available in cheap money, I would have a TBM700-C2.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 12:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3307 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Say you had a few million. This vs an Eclipse. What would you choose? I know the eclipse is less. Impressive airplane. Pilatus still wins in the utility category. That is a very screwy program with about as hazy a future as anything has had in aviation. When you consider the support, training, resale and overall ownership experience that Cessna offers, I would be much more inclined to compare to the Mustang or M2. As it turns out, the Mustang direct cost per mile is only ~1.5X that of the TBM700 and ~1.4X compared to TBM850. It's not as bad as you'd think. You'd have to consider the mission in order to answer that question but it would be a tough call...
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 13:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +709 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
The TBM 900 looks awesome, they will sell as much as they can produce.
I will be in FL next week for the US launch. The TBM 850 had about 850 ibs useful load with full fuel and I heard the 900 will be about the same. The 5 blade composite prop is actually 14-15 ibs heavier but then they added a new carbon fiber cowling so its probably a wash.
I heard they have 5 airplane ready to deliver and 4 will do the crossing together and be in FL next week.
Wow these winglets are sexy as hell, makes me want to work harder.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM 900 Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 13:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/15/08 Posts: 1427 Post Likes: +258 Location: KUES Waukesha, WI
Aircraft: Pieces of N121VP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Aerodynamics allways works. I am carefully looking at my children trying to decide which one I am going to sell for one of these  How many children do you have Florian? You might be able to get the premium model. 
Hey, wait!!!!!!! Count me in. I could get two!
_________________ "Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground......"
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|