18 Jun 2025, 19:23 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 13:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/22/09 Posts: 5642 Post Likes: +1115 Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Aircraft: 1977 A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here are some more numbers...
..........................................Eclipse...............................SF50
Max ramp weight...................6034................................6060 Useful load..........................2400.................................2300 Fuel (gallons)........................250.................................288 Great to have real numbers Arlen. Remember when looking at fuel capacity, the Cirrus is only burning through one engine. Seems like 200 gallons in the Cirrus will send you 3 hours at 275Kts with a one hour ifr reserve which will leave you 1100lbs for peeps and bags (while you fly half way across the US of A). 
_________________ It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill.WW
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 14:17 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 1671 Post Likes: +465 Location: Redwood City, CA (KPAO)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Don't necessarily assume better NM/gal in the single engine. Username Protected wrote: Expect an HONEST 340 knots on ~55 GPH Also note that projected or pre-certification numbers are rarely met by the certified version. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 14:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/02/08 Posts: 7812 Post Likes: +5825 Company: Rusnak Auto Group Location: Newport Coast, CA
Aircraft: Baron B55 N7123N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The eclipse is very small. I've been in them as well as the mockup of the Cirrus. If nothing else, the Cirrus is just laid out better. I was blown away with the ergonomics of the cabin. The outboard aft jump seats typify Cirrus' out of the box thinking. And as was previously stated, the baggage compartment is simply huge. Everyone has a comfortable seat, easy to get in and out of, and a great view too.
_________________ STAND UP FOR YOUR COUNTRY
Sven
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 14:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/22/09 Posts: 5642 Post Likes: +1115 Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Aircraft: 1977 A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: They are both personal short range transport type planes; 1-2 people. Someone help me with the math here. I must be getting screwed up. With 200 gallons the remaining useful load is at least a 1000 lbs. right? How far can the Cirrus jet go at say 230-240 kts on 200 gallons (factoring in a good 45 minute reserve)? In my A36 a remaining useful load of 1000lbs = 4 peeps and bags. 
_________________ It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill.WW
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 15:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/12 Posts: 7225 Post Likes: +13061 Location: Keller, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: '68 36 (E-19)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Someone help me with the math here. I must be getting screwed up. With 200 gallons the remaining useful load is at least a 1000 lbs. right? How far can the Cirrus jet go at say 230-240 kts on 200 gallons (factoring in a good 45 minute reserve)? In my A36 a remaining useful load of 1000lbs = 4 peeps and bags.  Yes, 940 # payload with 200 gal. At 230 kts, range would be ~4 hours at that speed, assuming 45' reserve. Roughly 43 GPH.
_________________ Things are rarely what they seem, but they're always exactly what they are.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7381 Post Likes: +4848 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Im pretty sure the Cirrus jet is only certify to FL250 which is nonsense for a jet. I doubt the 34 gph at that altitude. +1!
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7381 Post Likes: +4848 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The two airports near my house, PAO and SQL, are 2,400' and 2,600', which is why my friend with the Eclipse bases it across the bay at HWD. With a 200' shorter takeoff roll, the SF50 might be doable at SQL, although marginal. There is at least one Eclipse based at SQL. And the takeoff distances quoted are probably figured differently due to differences in single vs twin certification. I know the Eclipse takeoff/landing distances are distances to 50' AGL, I don't think they publish the ground roll. The Cirrus landing distance of 1245' is ground roll, they don't publish from 50' AGL distance. So... kind of comparing apples to oranges. Takeoff to 50' is 2128' in the Cirrus and 2433' in the Eclipse, but again, the Eclipse goes through the whole V1/Vr/V2 protocol on takeoff that simply doesn't apply to a single engine airplane, so... kind of hard to directly compare. They are both pretty decent. With all these little jets, the short field issue tends to be landing distances because they are slippery (little drag, no props) and it's critical to have good speed control on final. With no reverse, they better have good brakes. We have had at least one Eclipse go into the overrun at SQL (300' of extra pavement), luckily none off the end yet that I know of. Of course, Larry Eillison bases his CJ4 here, there's a CJ1+ (I think) here, and I have seen CJ2s and 3s in and out... You can get 'er done if you pay attention to weight control and good speed control on final.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Cirrus SF50 VisionJet "Fast Track to Production" Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 16:35 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 1671 Post Likes: +465 Location: Redwood City, CA (KPAO)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Of course, Larry Eillison bases his CJ4 here, there's a CJ1+ (I think) here, and I have seen CJ2s and 3s in and out... You can get 'er done if you pay attention to weight control and good speed control on final. That is impressive. I've seen a couple of Eclipses on the ground at PAO, so I know it's doable. There's a difference between doing it occasionally while lightly loaded, though, and making it your home base, where half your takeoffs and landings take place.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|