02 Jun 2025, 05:21 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Baron or Bust! Posted: 09 Nov 2014, 23:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/28/13 Posts: 196 Post Likes: +31 Location: Norwell, MA
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
I have owned a 1998 A36 for the past 11 years. She is magnificent! A Baron 58 seems to be the easiest transition. I am looking for a change and would like to hear all opinions on this subject. After discussing this with my 3 kids and my wife; I know that a twin engine is necessary. My budget is 500k to 600k. What are my most prudent options? Thanks Much, Greg Webb
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 00:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7094 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You should be able to pickup a nice G58, but truth be told if I were you I'd forget the G1000 and go for a full retrofit glass cockpit on a B58 and go for the most cherry one you can find. The reason being, the G1000 in my humble opinion is just not up to par with the G500 driven by GTN 750's. The later is just more intuitive and easy to use, not to mention upgradable. If I were you I'd look for a deiced 58 with 550's that's had the works done to it including full glass panel, top of the line paint and interior and low time factory engines or prestige overhauls like Victor Black or Powermasters engines with GAMI's. You should be able to find a good one, have fun looking! Do what Adam says.... you're in the range of what we spent on our B58. I can tell you now, that you will not be disappointed.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 14:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/28/13 Posts: 196 Post Likes: +31 Location: Norwell, MA
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
Adam, This is Great advice. Thank You. I wonder if approach plates are included with the GTN750. Traffic and weather would be nice too.
I have flown my Bonanza more than 700 hours and I have not gotten lost yet so whatever package is in the newer aircraft will be better than what I am currently using.
It seems that the G58's are over the budget so far.
Thanks Again, Greg
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 15:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 230 Post Likes: +77 Location: Texas
Aircraft: G1000 182
|
|
I am in the same boat and go back and forth between the g58 and a full Garmin or Aspen-Garmin retrofit. I have a G1000 Turbo 182 now and am pretty familiar with the system. I would also agree that the G500 + GTN is a better overall system than the G1000, with major, almost insurmountable caveat that the autopilot options for Barons are GFC700 and everything else a very distant second place. That in my mind is the major pro of the G1000 over an older one. The cons are cost, single AHAR/ADC, lots and lots of knob spinning relative to GTN and reduced functionality depending on how you look at it (engine monitoring, user-defined holds, backup instrumentation). Still, the autopilot integration and perfect flying are really, really nice.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 16:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12804 Post Likes: +5254 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am looking for a change What about your current Bonanza does not meet your needs? What do you want the new plane to do? Apart from two engines are there other non-functional requirements (newer than X, etc)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am in the same boat and go back and forth between the g58 and a full Garmin or Aspen-Garmin retrofit. I have a G1000 Turbo 182 now and am pretty familiar with the system. I would also agree that the G500 + GTN is a better overall system than the G1000, with major, almost insurmountable caveat that the autopilot options for Barons are GFC700 and everything else a very distant second place. That in my mind is the major pro of the G1000 over an older one. The cons are cost, single AHAR/ADC, lots and lots of knob spinning relative to GTN and reduced functionality depending on how you look at it (engine monitoring, user-defined holds, backup instrumentation). Still, the autopilot integration and perfect flying are really, really nice. I agree. If I were in the market now it would be for a pre G1000 plane. G1000 is 10 years old now and being replaced. There aren't enough G58's out there that there will be an STC sometime in the future to upgrade. Where as a B58 will always have STC's. The only benefit to the G1000 anymore is the GFC700. But I'm sure a great aftermarket AP will come along. I'd look for a low hour 2005 or so B58.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/16/08 Posts: 743 Post Likes: +633 Location: Nevada City, CA
Aircraft: Baron 55 w/550s
|
|
I have to say that if I (still) had three kids, a wife and $600K, I would be looking for the best Cessna 421C I could find. The transition for the pilot is fun, the plane is incredibly comfortable for passengers, and I'd put the difference between $600K and a great 421 into the fuel budget, and go just about wherever and whenever I want.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 230 Post Likes: +77 Location: Texas
Aircraft: G1000 182
|
|
Jason, you think? I have heard for years that the DFC90 is going to get a Baron STC, but ahem, radio silence for over a year now. When I talked to the Garmin folks at NBAA showing off their G600/GTN options they looked at me with blank stares when I mentioned engine monitors and GFC retrofits. I got the impression that I was the first person on earth that asked them why they don't have a retrofit autopilot/FCS option.
I appreciate the limited market for birds that are out of production where actual greenfield engineering would need to be done, but for the dozens (maybe hundreds now) of airframes where there is a G1000/GFC700 available from the factory, how hard could it be?
Of course, there is always that argument that no one would ever again buy a new airplane again...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 230 Post Likes: +77 Location: Texas
Aircraft: G1000 182
|
|
One could put this into a Baron, along with a new radar, new interior and new paint and still be way under what a lightly-used G58 would cost. You might even be ahead on the depreciation curve too Attachment: dukeb60-2.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason, you think? I have heard for years that the DFC90 is going to get a Baron STC, but ahem, radio silence for over a year now. When I talked to the Garmin folks at NBAA showing off their G600/GTN options they looked at me with blank stares when I mentioned engine monitors and GFC retrofits. I got the impression that I was the first person on earth that asked them why they don't have a retrofit autopilot/FCS option.
In that case, the problem is "piston twin". Nobody builds them anymore. They're just not on any avionics manufacturers radar unfortunately. I guess they're all busy working on the "new new".
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Baron or Bust! Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 17:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5957 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
How different we all are. It's great that that's the case - I salute it. It's what makes this world interesting.
If I had that kind of money to spend I would not walk, I would run away from any piston plane ever made. When you finally put a price on becoming mentally unstable by having to deal with:
Carb ice LOP/ROP Shock cooling Bootstrapping MP split/drift EGT spread CHT spread Detonation Pre-ignition Overhauling turbos Wastegates Spark plugs Valves Camshafts Morning sickness Vapor lock Rich cut Mixtures Vibrations Leaning Cracked cylinders
…then it's time to look at turbines.
I'm very glad that there are people out there who will buy a brand new Baron for $1 million, because I want Beechcraft to do well and survive. But I'm also incredulous they sell a single one when that will get you a very nice KA, Commander 1000 Jetprop or MU-2 Marquise kitted out to the hilt, without any of the above headaches.
I just did the math on my Aerostar for oil changes the other day. I change oil every 25hrs. I don't do it myself, and it takes my mechanics a few hours and costs me about $3-400 each time. That's almost $29K over the TBO of the engine in just oil change costs! That's basically the cost of a hot section inspection. I haven't even factored in the cracked cylinders, or the ubiquitous turbo overhauls, mag overhauls, or the $100/pop spark plugs yet that will happen on top of this on the way to TBO.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|