banner
banner

03 Nov 2025, 07:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 09:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/12
Posts: 240
Post Likes: +65
Location: KGAI
Aircraft: Twin Comanche
I periodically toy with the idea of purchasing a twin, or half a twin with a buddy, purely for the purpose of getting ME rating/experience/logged ME time. The plane would have to be mechanically sound but avionics and paint could be mediocre.

Because I already own a nicely equipped '71 F33A which my family likes and fits my missions perfectly, I'm not contemplating a premium offering like a Baron.

Was thinking about an Apache as an inexpensive to buy, relatively inexpensive to re-engine, trainer type twin that my friends and I can bomb around in for fun without breaking the bank. Plane would be flown about once a week.

Whenever I say this, someone always pops up and responds that what you really want is a .... (Aztec, Seminole, Twin Commanche, etc).

So, for purposes of conversation, pls share your insights re bargain basement twins with relatively low maintenance costs and relatively simple systems.

Thx!

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 10:51 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/14/08
Posts: 3133
Post Likes: +2674
Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
:tape:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 10:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 7664
Post Likes: +3697
Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
Buy Adam's non beech Travelair, then people in beechtalk will talk to you again.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:01 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
How about some more info on your missions Tim. Pax, UL, distance, needs...

Is this meant to replace your Bo or just tool to build cheap twin time?

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/01/11
Posts: 434
Post Likes: +240
Company: Learning Fundamentals, Inc.
Location: KSBP
Aircraft: PA28, C210
Username Protected wrote:
Buy Adam's beech Travelair.


I second that. A Travelair with Lycoming 360 engines would be easy to maintain, uses less than 20 gph, and flies at 160kts. They are a very popular plane with flight schools so you could sell it easily. You can pick up nice ones for less than $50,000.

From what I’ve heard they have decent 1 engine performance—much better than most Apaches and lower powered Twin Comanches.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/12
Posts: 240
Post Likes: +65
Location: KGAI
Aircraft: Twin Comanche
Hi Don.

For the purposes of this exercise, I'm assuming I'm keeping the F33A.

So, mission would be limited to providing (relatively) inexpensive ME time/experience for me and my friends, and cross countries limited to 300 NM mostly.

Mostly VFR + light IFR on top.

Plane needs to be safe,l cheap to keep, fit in a t-hangar, and resaleable in the future.

Don't have anything against considering Beech ME products, just anticipated that the buy-in cost and maintenance/engine overhaul costs would be considerably higher than an Apache.

Just to emphasize, I'm not about to write a check for some time, just doing some preliminary homework to see if this makes any sense at all.

best

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/21/14
Posts: 185
Post Likes: +119
Aircraft: C33A, Challenger 604
Cheap to overhaul is the kicker here. I suspect even with a very low end overhaul, you're looking at $50-60k all in, including the installs. That kind of throws "cheap" out the window.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:25 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/18/13
Posts: 315
Post Likes: +55
Company: Blackledge Aerial Sprayers
Location: Watonga Oklahoma
Aircraft: Bonanza C35
I use to own an Apache with 160 hp engines on it. I loved that airplane and we made many trips together.

_________________
Harold Blackledge
ASEL 5679X 9086R 646D 9309L
AMEL
INST
ROTOCRAFT-Helicopter
18000 hrs


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:31 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
Cheap to overhaul is the kicker here. I suspect even with a very low end overhaul, you're looking at $50-60k all in, including the installs. That kind of throws "cheap" out the window.


Overhaul is out of the question for this mission unless you want to end up 80k in the hole. I suggest finding a place that will rent you a Seminol.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 11:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/12
Posts: 240
Post Likes: +65
Location: KGAI
Aircraft: Twin Comanche
Thx for all of the replies so far.

Want to be able to jump into it whenever I want, on short notice, so that sorta rules out renting a flight school plane.

Roger on the cost of overhauls.

Sounds like what I'm hearing so far is that you have to find a twin with lower-time engines and then sell them before they look too much like runouts?

Would love to hear more about the Apache that was well loved.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 12:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/23/14
Posts: 14
Post Likes: +10
Aircraft: BE20 BE9L
Tim,

You did not mention, but I will add, that the airplane needs to be simple and honest to learn to fly and get a multi-engine rating. Safety, cost and a good platform to learn on. That is easy to solve. You have to look no further than the Multi-Engine training market to see what is best even if you don't like the answer... The pedestrian Seminole.

Now, if you are already going to have a ME rating then the options open up some.

Chuck


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 12:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Travel Air. Good ME training platform, especially for a Bonanza pilot. If you're simply wanting to get your multi rating, it's a quick process. Three days and I was done. If you want to build multi time, then buying a twin might make sense. Otherwise, maybe not.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 12:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/12
Posts: 240
Post Likes: +65
Location: KGAI
Aircraft: Twin Comanche
Ideally want to build ME time, and also stay current.

If it helps with insurance etc. I could get my ME rating before stepping up.

As Chuck points out, just want a fun,forgiving airframe to learn with.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 12:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 7664
Post Likes: +3697
Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
If you bought a Travelair, you would sell the F33. Same mission very little more operating cost. The others , mostly not so.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Non-Beech Twins that are very cheap to fly/overhaul?
PostPosted: 23 Sep 2014, 18:54 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
You can probably buy a decent Piper Apache for 20-30k. With the extra hangar, insurance and maintenance though, I think you're better off financially just selling the F33A and getting a good solid travel air or Baron and flying that instead for a few years.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Plane AC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Plane AC Tile.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.sarasota.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.