27 Apr 2024, 12:43 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 22 May 2014, 11:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6365 Post Likes: +5545 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Turbo Commander 680V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Plus, it's actually priced right. A PC12 is, what, $4 mill? A TBM900 is like $3.5mill? This is $4.5mill.
What would you rather have? PC-12, once you study what that plane can do it's seriously incredible. Got 30 hrs in the 850. It does not even come close to the PC-12.
I love the PC12, don't get me wrong. It's a brilliant SUV (and I also prefer it to the 850). But for pure personal travel, a Hondajet would tick my boxes.
Yeah, what's the deal with withholding a toilet on multimillion dollar aircraft? Don't they know that the real ones making the decisions are often non-flying members of family/company? This could make or break a decision. They want a toilet. Give them a toilet!
_________________ Problem is the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 22 May 2014, 12:39 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/11/14 Posts: 582 Post Likes: +25 Location: KCOE/KSFF
|
|
Their VLJ entry may or may not succeed (competing directly with the Cessna CJ and Embraer Phenom VLJ's), but what we are very excited about is their HF120 turbo fan engine...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 22 May 2014, 12:56 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/16/10 Posts: 2031 Post Likes: +886 Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Their VLJ entry may or may not succeed (competing directly with the Cessna CJ and Embraer Phenom VLJ's), but what we are very excited about is their HF120 turbo fan engine... I think you're on to them Patrick. The Honda Jet was more about the engine development than the airframe. The airframe is just me too with the exception of the wing pylons, which in my opinion are fugly. They do however provide more cabin room to work with on short platform, which is beneficial. I say they should have put the wing on top, hung the engines below. It would have looked better.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 23 May 2014, 08:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/18/11 Posts: 2235 Post Likes: +1961 Location: (West of) St Louis, MO KFYG
Aircraft: PA28 180C
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Their VLJ entry may or may not succeed (competing directly with the Cessna CJ and Embraer Phenom VLJ's), but what we are very excited about is their HF120 turbo fan engine... Honda has always been about the engine first and foremost. And rightfully or wrongfully. Sometimes they have wrapped their engines in/around a pretty good vehicle. As to looks - If they had tried to copy an Aerostar they would have nailed it visually me thinks.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 24 May 2014, 00:16 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/25/13 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +128
|
|
I really think what everyone here is missing is the fact that this jet will deliver TBM900 cost per mile, 100knots faster with twin jet engine reliability. That's why it took 30 years to get here.
And a hot wing for $4.5M.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 24 May 2014, 00:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11105 Post Likes: +7090 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I really think what everyone here is missing is the fact that this jet will deliver TBM900 cost per mile, 100knots faster with twin jet engine reliability. That's why it took 30 years to get here.
And a hot wing for $4.5M. Says who? Honda? PC-12 will do 1500 miles and this jet with 5 people will do how much? Land, refuel and then take off again, what are those average speeds? PC-24 is a far better airplane already..... Are those engines not an offshoot of a GE engine.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 24 May 2014, 09:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Says who? Honda?
PC-12 will do 1500 miles and this jet with 5 people will do how much? Land, refuel and then take off again, what are those average speeds?
PC-24 is a far better airplane already.....
Are those engines not an offshoot of a GE engine. +1. I don't care about speed. I want range and a lav. PC12 will beat any VLJ almost anywhere in and out of Atlanta.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet - short article but lots of pics Posted: 25 May 2014, 17:26 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/04/14 Posts: 65 Post Likes: +10
Aircraft: A330/340
|
|
Hi, the main problem is that every company is putting too much into perfecting the plane, stuffing it with pricey avionics just to make a splash. What people really want is a fast, cheap working machine that will not eat up all their money. On a typical mission it does not matter if you save 10 minutes over every 3 hours of flight, and a super-duper-mega-fancy glass-cockpit still does not make you a better or safer pilot. It will cost you a fortune to buy it, and another fortune to keep it updated. That is the main reason why commercial planes often look old-fashioned compared to the new zippy jets. A jet with 4-6 seats, about as fast as the rest ( less than 300kt should do the trick ) and with avionics to go safely IFR and shoot whatever approach is available, 4 hours endurance and a toilet, but no fancy bling-bling with a price-sticker well below 3million will sell like hotcake. No need for the newest engines, because you can't have them repaired everywhere. No need for the lowest fuel flow, because 1million less in purchasing the plane will give you a lot of fuel. No need for 100.000 dollars extra in avionic, better spend 10.000 for decent training and use the rest to practice flying. Just my 2 cents, Ralph P.S. just take a V-tail and have someone put a modern version of an 550 in it, less noise, less thirst, just up to todays standard, modern ignition and auto-fuel but no added magic. This would make a plane almost too good to believe….
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|