banner
banner

02 Jun 2025, 13:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 16:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/15/10
Posts: 691
Post Likes: +101
Location: Atlanta
Aircraft: 77' B55
I'm starting to look at planes with more useful load than my 60' Deb. I have asked about v35 and a36 but I don't know anything about the Cessna210. Any of you guys have time in one?
Thanks,
Russell


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 16:09 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/15/08
Posts: 1101
Post Likes: +59
Location: Santa Rosa, CA (KSTS)
Aircraft: 1975 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
I'm starting to look at planes with more useful load than my 60' Deb. I have asked about v35 and a36 but I don't know anything about the Cessna210. Any of you guys have time in one?
Thanks,
Russell


They are great airplanes and I'd take an A36 over a 210 any day.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 16:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12804
Post Likes: +5254
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
210's are great planes suited for a slightly different mission than a Bonanza. 210 is an Escalade, Bonanza is an S class mercedes. If you want to haul A LOT with no CG issues, 210 is your bird.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 17:03 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/01/11
Posts: 434
Post Likes: +240
Company: Learning Fundamentals, Inc.
Location: KSBP
Aircraft: PA28, C210
We have a 1973 T201L and my brother frequently fills the seats with kids. Useful load in ours is 938lbs. Not that the kids are getting bigger, he does have to pay attention to total weight, but not how it’s loaded. On the last trip he had room for 94lbs of baggage. I noticed that he left water bottles and jars of peanuts on the hangar floor, so I’m pretty sure he was at gross.

He’s not a LOP guy so he burns 20gph at ~165kts.

I’ve never flown a Beech, but think it handles fine. Easier to land than a 182. As with any high wing, you need to be firmly on the ground before you start braking or you’ll put flat spots in the tires.

The first annual was a lot, but for the last few years annuals and repairs have been around $5,000 for around 100 hours per year of flying. We switched IAs this year and are doing most of the work ourselves, so we’re hoping for a lower annual cost.

A friend with a 79 has burned up a couple of cylinders, but we have high compressions and no turbo issues.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 17:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/06/09
Posts: 29
Post Likes: +7
Aircraft: Baron 58
I had a 78 T210M for about five years. Wonderful airplane, reasonably fast, and really carries a load. Not as nice to fly as a Bonanza, it is a bit trucky, although it is an excellent instrument platform. Much more convenient than a Beech when it rains, as you get out under the wing. Far easier to drain the tanks, and you fly in the shade. For sight seeing it is great as you can see straight down, but not into the turns.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 17:57 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 10873
Post Likes: +2245
Company: MBG Properties
Location: Knoxville, TN (KDKX)
Aircraft: 1972 Bonanza V35B
Username Protected wrote:
I had a 78 T210M for about five years. Wonderful airplane, reasonably fast, and really carries a load. Not as nice to fly as a Bonanza, it is a bit trucky, although it is an excellent instrument platform. Much more convenient than a Beech when it rains, as you get out under the wing. Far easier to drain the tanks, and you fly in the shade. For sight seeing it is great as you can see straight down, but not into the turns.

Exactly my experience in 350 hours in the same model.

Story: I once flew into Snyder, OK, to a grass strip...the only airport for the town. Just before arrival it started pouring rain. With no DME, I had to circle several times before I saw a wind sock. A local saw me circling. He drove under the wing just as I found a place to park the plane. I got out of the plane and into his Cadillac without getting a drop of rain on me. :D

_________________
Max Grogan

Come fly with me.

My photos: https://photos.google.com/albums


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 29 Apr 2014, 18:06 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 02/23/08
Posts: 6414
Post Likes: +9589
Company: Schulte Booth, P.C.
Location: Easton, MD (KESN)
Aircraft: 1958 Bonanza 35
Username Protected wrote:

Story: I once flew into Snyder, OK, to a grass strip...the only airport for the town. Just before arrival it started pouring rain. With no DME, I had to circle several times before I saw a wind sock. A local saw me circling. He drove under the wing just as I found a place to park the plane. I got out of the plane and into his Cadillac without getting a drop of rain on me. :D


And this is exactly why general aviation represents the best of our Country.

What a privileged few we are.

_________________
- As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.

Robert D. Schulte
http://www.schultebooth.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 08:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2757
Post Likes: +2588
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:
I had a 78 T210M for about five years. Wonderful airplane, reasonably fast, and really carries a load. Not as nice to fly as a Bonanza, it is a bit trucky, although it is an excellent instrument platform. Much more convenient than a Beech when it rains, as you get out under the wing. Far easier to drain the tanks, and you fly in the shade. For sight seeing it is great as you can see straight down, but not into the turns.


Gilbert said it very well - the T210 is one of the best single engine airplanes out there.

I had 500+ hours in rented F33s and A36s and truly loved flying Bonanzas (I still do) but when it came time to purchase my own plane I chose a 1980 T210. Why?

- more interior room. The A36 just doesn't have any baggage area and if people are sitting in the back there's no where to put "stuff". The 210 has a nice baggage area behind the rear seats.
- I liked the two doors, however this ones a wash with the A36 cargo door
- more fuel and range. Down low, the T210 and A36 are about the same speed, but up high where you can take more advantage of the turbo, the T210 is faster. Also, the stock T210 has 89 gallons whereas the A36 only has 74 (yes, you can add tips and/or TAT turbo)
- air conditioning - factory AC is more readily available on the 210. When it worked it was great, but it was very finicky.
- radar pod - very nice addition on the 210, even with NEXRAD. Hard to find in a A36
- known ice capable.
- slightly better off field performer (don't believe the bs about the 210 gear system - it's rock solid).

Please don't get me wrong - I love flying Bonanzas, but the above were MY reasons for purchasing a known ice, radar equipped and air conditioned T210. Every mission and pilot is different!

FYI, I have a 421 now and love this airplane, but still miss my 210!

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 10:15 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 14699
Post Likes: +4379
Location: St. Pete, FL
Aircraft: BE 58
I'm just NOT a 210 person... my few experiences with them just turned me off compared to the A36. I'd take the Bonanza hands down.... even if I have to get wet when getting out. But that's what umbrellas are for.

_________________
Larry


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 10:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/14
Posts: 2280
Post Likes: +2041
Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
+1 What Robert said!! The fat sister handles like a truck the Bo is a sport utility vehicle. I think its easier to get in and out of the Cessna than the Bo. Umbrellas don't work as well as the high wing as the interior is going to get wet in the Bo. Both are great performers.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 10:30 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 04/16/12
Posts: 7194
Post Likes: +12937
Location: Keller, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: '68 36 (E-19)
Username Protected wrote:

- more interior room. The A36 just doesn't have any baggage area and if people are sitting in the back there's no where to put "stuff". The 210 has a nice baggage area behind the rear seats.

- more fuel and range. Down low, the T210 and A36 are about the same speed, but up high where you can take more advantage of the turbo, the T210 is faster. Also, the stock T210 has 89 gallons whereas the A36 only has 74 (yes, you can add tips and/or TAT turbo)

Robert


Many A36s have the rear cargo area option, or it can be added if needed.

Comparing a T210 to a non TN/turbo A36 is apples and oranges. A Turbo or TN A36 will absolutely smoke a T210 at any altitude.

Just sayin.

Agree the T210 is a great airplane. I seriously considered it before settling on the 36. I ultimately discounted it because it's a Chevy Suburban and I wanted a Porsche Cayenne.

_________________
Things are rarely what they seem, but they're always exactly what they are.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 19:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/13/10
Posts: 247
Post Likes: +192
Location: St Augustine, FL
Aircraft: Queen Air 65
I have over 1,000 hrs in a 210, but only an hour to two in a Bonanza. Not sure about the analogies to an SUV vs a sports car. This all seems a stretch. Speed: basically the same. Fuel consumption: about the same. Payload with full fuel, 210 significantly better. Room for passengers and luggage, 210 much better. Bonanzas are certainly a quality airplane, but the 210 and perhaps the Piper Lance (I used to own one of those too) are "better" if you're needing more room and payload.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 21:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/18/11
Posts: 2433
Post Likes: +2433
Location: (West of) St Louis, MO KFYG
Aircraft: PA28 180C
210's have the funkiest retractable main landing gear in existance. Seems to more "fall off" than retract. But it certanily must be robust enough.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 22:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/18/13
Posts: 418
Post Likes: +79
Location: TEXAS
Aircraft: 1964 BE35
Username Protected wrote:
210's are great planes suited for a slightly different mission than a Bonanza. 210 is an Escalade, Bonanza is an S class mercedes. If you want to haul A LOT with no CG issues, 210 is your bird.


+1

I have about 250 hours in NA & T210's. I have little to no experience in Bonanzas other than traveling with friends. I'm looking for my first Bonanza now. The T210 is a good airplane. TAS 155 kts. Useful load around 1500 lbs. Performs well. Flown them with the Robertson and Horton STOL kits on them. 6 seats. The front and middle row is comfortable. The back two seats should be for smaller folks and it's a climb to get back there. Good IFR machine. I have the chance to buy either. I want the Bonanza.


Top

 Post subject: Re: What about the Cessna 210?
PostPosted: 30 Apr 2014, 22:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/23/09
Posts: 1114
Post Likes: +628
Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
Russell,
I owned one for 10 years and 1200 hours. Loved it. Other than what has been said, if you are interested in going further, purchase John Frank's buyers guide from the Cessna Pilots Association. Details out the modifications made for each year. Paul New with Tennessee Aircraft is also a great resource for 210 maintenance information.

Brent


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.tat-85x100.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.