banner
banner

27 Apr 2024, 04:16 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 371 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 25  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 08:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/04/14
Posts: 119
Post Likes: +53
Aircraft: Lancair evolution
Before I buy that thing check with the FAA
I bet that airplane gets repossessed by the feds for drug related issues


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 12:31 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1562
Post Likes: +1781
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Username Protected wrote:

So buy it delivered...


Only if COD is an option.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 16:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/07/12
Posts: 537
Post Likes: +900
Location: Addison, TX
Can anyone with experience compare the inside noise level of a MU-2 vs C421?

i.e. Can passengers have relatively normal conversations with one another (without the benefit of headsets) same as the 421?

Thanks,


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 18:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/08
Posts: 2928
Post Likes: +928
Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory
Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
Username Protected wrote:
Can anyone with experience compare the inside noise level of a MU-2 vs C421?

i.e. Can passengers have relatively normal conversations with one another (without the benefit of headsets) same as the 421?

Thanks,

The 421 is much quieter than the MU-2. Inside the MU-2 the noise is not hateful, surely not as bad as the exterior. I would wear headsets in either, although the 421 you could at least converse without headsets.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 18:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 6333
Post Likes: +3813
Location: San Carlos, CA - KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Can anyone with experience compare the inside noise level of a MU-2 vs C421?

i.e. Can passengers have relatively normal conversations with one another (without the benefit of headsets) same as the 421?

Thanks,

I don't have enough recent experience in a 421 to compare directly. But in my Solitaire, we prefer to wear headphones though I know the previous owner's passengers typically did not. I think it's a little loud without them. But... it's not brutally loud by any means, and one could have a conversation without them.

Oh, and the exterior ground noise is not really a factor inside. It's all exterior.

Of course, without headphones you also can't rock out to the tunes streaming from the XM Classic Rewind station... :)

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 21:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/16/10
Posts: 8892
Post Likes: +1956
Username Protected wrote:

Only if COD is an option.


Wouldn't be too much of a surprise if the airframe could do it! :lol:

_________________
If you think nobody cares about you. Try not paying your income tax.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 23:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 693
Post Likes: +40
Location: KBJC
Aircraft: MU-2B-60
Username Protected wrote:
Can anyone with experience compare the inside noise level of a MU-2 vs C421?

i.e. Can passengers have relatively normal conversations with one another (without the benefit of headsets) same as the 421?

Thanks,


I have never been in a C421 so I can't compare. But, my passengers will often elect not to wear headsets in the back and seem to be quite happy. I would expect it is slightly louder than the C421.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2018, 23:37 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I have never been in a C421 so I can't compare. But, my passengers will often elect not to wear headsets in the back and seem to be quite happy. I would expect it is slightly louder than the C421.

It will vary from model to model.

A Marquise, in the back, is fairly quiet, probably similar to a 421.

My airplane, in the front, is pretty noisy, more than a 421.

So the answer is, it depends.

Most of the the noise in the MU2 is prop noise. My RPM is 2000, the 4 blade versions are 1591 RPM. 421 is generally between those two numbers.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 00:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/07/12
Posts: 537
Post Likes: +900
Location: Addison, TX
Username Protected wrote:
Can anyone with experience compare the inside noise level of a MU-2 vs C421?

i.e. Can passengers have relatively normal conversations with one another (without the benefit of headsets) same as the 421?

Thanks,


Thanks for the generous reply's everyone.

I'll take all that and read between the lines to mean...

421 is quieter but you get there so much faster in the MU-2 that it's all a wash and passengers won't notice.
:dancing:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 00:51 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
421 is quieter but you get there so much faster in the MU-2 that it's all a wash and passengers won't notice.

To a certain extent, yes.

Basically, if you can't achieve truly headset free cabin, then with ANR headsets, it no longer matters that much.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 01:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/07/12
Posts: 537
Post Likes: +900
Location: Addison, TX
Username Protected wrote:
421 is quieter but you get there so much faster in the MU-2 that it's all a wash and passengers won't notice.

To a certain extent, yes.

Basically, if you can't achieve truly headset free cabin, then with ANR headsets, it no longer matters that much.

Mike C.


I understand what you're saying but I've sat in the 421 cockpit talking to the back seat passengers in an almost normal voice.

That's not the same as saying I could speak in a normal volume or that headsets wouldn't have helped.

Only that with grand-kids (and I've got 14), the option to go without is a big big deal.

Thanks everyone,

Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 03:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/29/14
Posts: 207
Post Likes: +73
I’ve just removed all the pax headsets from my 421. After 12 months of no-one ever wearing them I decided they just get in the way.

So just the two headsets up the front now.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 09:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4573
Post Likes: +3298
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
I've sat in the 421 cockpit talking to the back seat passengers in an almost normal voice.



We do that in our Merlin IIIC all day long. Whether or not the kids listen is another thing all together. Just as a point of reference.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 12:33 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/07/12
Posts: 537
Post Likes: +900
Location: Addison, TX
Username Protected wrote:
We do that in our Merlin IIIC all day long. Whether or not the kids listen is another thing all together. Just as a point of reference.


Erwin,

Thanks for your comment.

I've never flown in any Garrett powered plane but had assumed the extra noise might be a problem...somewhat alleviated by the extra beef on a TP airframe.

Sounds like the Merlin's reputation for being extra beefy might not be without warrant when it comes to sound proofing and makes me that much more jealous.

Have a good day everyone.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mitsubishi MU-2
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2018, 13:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1911
Post Likes: +926
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
I owned a 421 for 5 years.

A fantastic airplane, good cabin, good speed, good cargo space.

Takes a little more involvement by the owner to keep up with it, but I am that way and never minded heading out to the airport.

I now fly a turbine Commander, my family says there is no difference in cabin sound between the 421 and my Commander. The iPhone DB app confirms that.

Nobody ever wears headphones in either airplane, even though I provide them. They are strictly for movies and music.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 371 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 25  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.