03 May 2025, 14:35 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 15:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/23/09 Posts: 12063 Post Likes: +11588 Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
|
|
Quote: If you can find a 170B they have 172 style wings with the nice big fowler flaps and single struts. Yes Yes Yes... plus the 180 engine. Just try and find one. You are right... if you do, don't sell it.
_________________ Life is for living. Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 15:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/29/09 Posts: 4166 Post Likes: +2986 Company: Craft Air Services, LLC Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks for all of the replies so far! I'd defiitely shoot for the A or B model to get the metal wings. I'm just starting to learn about these so I appreciate the tips. I'm looking in the 30-40amu range even with partners, so I have no hope of finding one with the O-360 180hp conversion I'm afraid. That does sound like a hell of a short field performer, though. My wife has an early 172 (square tail) with the 180 and an early STOL Kit and 40 degrees of flaps. I have operated it on and off in just under 300 feet if I can get about 10mph of wind to work with. Fun, Fun, Fun! 
_________________ Who is John Galt?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 15:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/16/10 Posts: 2021 Post Likes: +896 Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
|
|
If you're willing to own a vintage airplane such as a 170, why not consider an earlier model 180. Now you've got something you can have fun with, and really go somewhere with 3-4 people and bags. A 170 with the 180hp engine conversion is cool, but a 180 with 230hp is better! Probably the best airplane Cezzna ever built is the 180/185. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 15:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/13/08 Posts: 3245 Post Likes: +1872 Company: Flight Review, Inc Location: Cave Creek, AZ
Aircraft: King Airs
|
|
Cannot go wrong with either a 170 or an early 180, but for the budget, you'll likely have more options with the 170. I owned a 1951 170A for a few years. Did a lot of the back country of Idaho as well as a lot of Arizona flying. Like a 172, it's a dog with four people but a fine performer with two. It has the best forward visibility of any tailwheel airplane I have flown...no need to S-turn while taxiing.
My current plane, for the last 11 years, is a 1977 180K. Handles like a truck compared to the 170, but, oh my, what a performer! It has the Kenmore ATC for the 185 takeoff weight (3,190 pounds vs 2,800 pounds stock) and, for the last four years, has the Air Plain's IO-550 300 HP STC with an 86-inch McCauley three-blade. When I bought her, she had the P-Ponk 0-470-50 (270 HP) engine STC and I registered her as N184TC 'cause it was almost a 185. Now, with the IO-550, some friends say I should re-register as N187TC, since it's more plane than your typical 185.
_________________ Tom Clements Flight Review, Inc. Cave Creek, Arizona
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 16:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/28/09 Posts: 142 Post Likes: +1
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ...and, for the last four years, has the Air Plain's IO-550 300 HP STC with an 86-inch McCauley three-blade. When I bought her, she had the P-Ponk 0-470-50 (270 HP) engine STC and I registered her as N184TC 'cause it was almost a 185. Now, with the IO-550, some friends say I should re-register as N187TC, since it's more plane than your typical 185. Damn, I bet that thing gets up and climbs like a rocket! Got any pics to share?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Tell me about the Cessna 170 Posted: 27 Aug 2012, 17:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/18/07 Posts: 20815 Post Likes: +10019 Location: W Michigan
Aircraft: Ex PA22, P28R, V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A PA-22/20 (Tri-Pacer conversion to conventional gear) would be another option to consider. +1, particularly if you get the 150hp model - faster than similar vintage Cessnas. They are also great airplanes if you need to come down in a hurry. 
_________________ Stop Continental Drift.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|