29 Apr 2024, 01:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can you help me ID this experimental jet? Posted: 05 Jun 2012, 07:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/12 Posts: 888 Post Likes: +274 Location: Pensacola, FL
Aircraft: P35, 1963
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I worked line service in college, and we had a military refueling contract. We would get those damn Tweets in by the DOZEN and ear plugs + muffs wouldn't block at all of that noise. They took 265-275 gallons each, and they were slow over-wing fuelers (vs. single-point hookups) and we would play rock-paper-scissors in the line shack to see who would take care of 'em. Not much fun when it was 100 degrees and you were looking at a couple hours of fueling...
I'm sure they would be a ton of fun to fly, but I think they only got ~2 hour missions on those 275 gallons. No thanks! (as an owner) Scott - On a local training mission we'd be looking at 1.3 hours. On cross country flights we might get 1.7 or a little more.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can you help me ID this experimental jet? Posted: 06 Jun 2012, 15:14 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/29/08 Posts: 89 Location: Virginia
Aircraft: A-36
|
|
I experienced my first inverted spin in a T 37. Never again. The story told to us was that the boundary layer fence added to the nose was installed after the Cessna test pilot ejected when he could not recover from a spin. Old wives tale??
I recall the spin recovery included a very vigorous forward movement of the stick. That's how I entered the inverted spin
Lots of high frequency hearing loss
Alan
Fly Safe
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can you help me ID this experimental jet? Posted: 06 Jun 2012, 15:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/12 Posts: 888 Post Likes: +274 Location: Pensacola, FL
Aircraft: P35, 1963
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I experienced my first inverted spin in a T 37. Never again. The story told to us was that the boundary layer fence added to the nose was installed after the Cessna test pilot ejected when he could not recover from a spin. Old wives tale??
I recall the spin recovery included a very vigorous forward movement of the stick. That's how I entered the inverted spin
Lots of high frequency hearing loss
Alan
Fly Safe The T-37 had a couple of mods for spins. One was the horizontal "spin strakes" on either side of the nose and another was the addition of a small vertical fin below the tail. I seem to recall they also increased the amount of elevator travel. You're right that it required an abrupt full forward stick if you were doing the fully developed spin recovery procedure. Otherwise a smooth application of forward stick and opposite rudderr would fly it out of the spin 99% of the time. You should try doing an intentional slow spin recovery...it causes the airplane to spin faster as it slowly pitches more toward the vertical, much like an ice skater who pulls her arms in during a spin. Yeehaw! Tom
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|