23 Oct 2025, 09:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 09:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/12/09 Posts: 1376 Post Likes: +262
Aircraft: B95A Travel Air
|
|
This should be interesting. There will surely be more to this story than what is printed. Is Southwest taking over ATC in Florida like they have elsewhere?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 09:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13614 Post Likes: +7742 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This should be interesting. There will surely be more to this story than what is printed. Is Southwest taking over ATC in Florida like they have elsewhere? Taking over ATC? No comprendo.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 09:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/12/09 Posts: 1376 Post Likes: +262
Aircraft: B95A Travel Air
|
|
They basically own the controllers at Hobby and Vegas. I've been right over the airport and then sent on a 10 mile downwind to let SW on a 10 mile final land in front of me, and I've held in the number one position while they've let 10 or more SW flights takeoff in front of me at Vegas. They definitely get priority over ga traffic, it's well known in the corporate world. Keep in mind, I was flying a corporate jet when this happened. I've heard rumors the tower chief at Vegas is very close with SW.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 10:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/24/09 Posts: 299 Post Likes: +2 Location: Miami, Fl (KTMB)
Aircraft: C421C/PA28-181
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why would an ATC ask a commercial flight to check on another airplane?
Why would another airplane need to be checked on?
Why would the SW crew agree to check on another airplane?
What does "check on" mean?
Lot's more to this strange story. 1. Don't know but I guess because they were close by 2. Because they had not responded to ATC in something like an hour from what I read 3. Don't know, maybe because they were asked and trying to be neighborly? 4. Fly by and visually inspect the plane for distress After they were 'checked on' they did contact ATC from what I read
_________________ ------- Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 10:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1. Don't know but I guess because they were close by 2. Because they had not responded to ATC in something like an hour from what I read 3. Don't know, maybe because they were asked and trying to be neighborly? 4. Fly by and visually inspect the plane for distress
After they were 'checked on' they did contact ATC from what I read
1. Have you ever heard of anyone being asked by ATC to visually check on another plane? Especially one that was "close by"? I'm always told to turn the other way. 2. Would this require a visual inspection by a commercial passenger jet? 3. Really? 4. Don't distressed planes usually just fall from the sky or land somewhere?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 10:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/31/10 Posts: 305 Post Likes: +13
Aircraft: P35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why would an ATC ask a commercial flight to check on another airplane?
Why would another airplane need to be checked on?
Why would the SW crew agree to check on another airplane?
What does "check on" mean?
Lot's more to this strange story. 1. Don't know but I guess because they were close by 2. Because they had not responded to ATC in something like an hour from what I read 3. Don't know, maybe because they were asked and trying to be neighborly? 4. Fly by and visually inspect the plane for distress After they were 'checked on' they did contact ATC from what I read
The last thing I want or need is a 737 trying to fly formation off of a light single airplane close enough that they can see my signs of distress. The article states that the 737 flight crew saw "two people in the cockpit." That is WAY too close for dissimilar unbriefed formation - especially when one party has NO idea that formation is taking place.
I'm sure they DID check in with ATC to say something to the effect of... WTF is a 737 doing flying off my right wing?!?
Last edited on 30 Mar 2011, 10:20, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 10:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/26/08 Posts: 3169 Post Likes: +96 Company: FlyMo Arborists Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Don't distressed planes usually just fall from the sky or land somewhere? If the pilot is unconcious and the AP is on then the plane will go until fuel is exhausted. That's what happened with Payne Stewart. The military checked on him, though, not a commercial jet. It must be frustrating to see an occupied plane and know yup, he's buying the farm in a few hours.
_________________ ... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 13:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Don't distressed planes usually just fall from the sky or land somewhere? If the pilot is unconcious and the AP is on then the plane will go until fuel is exhausted. That's what happened with Payne Stewart. The military checked on him, though, not a commercial jet. It must be frustrating to see an occupied plane and know yup, he's buying the farm in a few hours.
If the SR22 is making turns and changing altitudes then it's probably not the autopilot. If this same controller was dealing with the same plane for an hour, then the plane wasn't flying in a straight line.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 13:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/26/08 Posts: 3169 Post Likes: +96 Company: FlyMo Arborists Location: Rochester Hills, MI (KPTK)
Aircraft: C172M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If the SR22 is making turns and changing altitudes then it's probably not the autopilot. If this same controller was dealing with the same plane for an hour, then the plane wasn't flying in a straight line. You would know more about that than I do. I haven't been high enough, long enough, to know how quickly a Cirrus would pass through centers in that part of the country. The only time I ever got close to such an experience was as a pax in a Baron. At about 200 KNT GS we seemed to switch ATC frequencies every thirty minutes or so while flying in basically straight lines between Nashville and Detroit.
_________________ ... with your penchant for virgins I'm bringing a dual yoke when we fly. -- J. Johnson
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 13:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If the SR22 is making turns and changing altitudes then it's probably not the autopilot. If this same controller was dealing with the same plane for an hour, then the plane wasn't flying in a straight line. You would know more about that than I do. I haven't been high enough, long enough, to know how quickly a Cirrus would pass through centers in that part of the country. The only time I ever got close to such an experience was as a pax in a Baron. At about 200 KNT GS we seemed to switch ATC frequencies every thirty minutes or so while flying in basically straight lines between Nashville and Detroit.
I'd say on any flight in the S.E. I'm changing frequency on average every 10 minutes.
I've never timed it but a flight from Atlanta to Charleston 1hr has me on at least 5 different frequencies over the course of the flight. I'd deal with Atlanta, Jax and Charleston approach.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Controller, 737 Crew Suspended After Cirrus Intercept Posted: 30 Mar 2011, 13:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/11/09 Posts: 944 Post Likes: +297 Location: KAOH Lima, OH
Aircraft: B58 AC11
|
|
At 11,000 ft I believe you'd be with Center after the handoff at 10K
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|