23 Apr 2024, 23:23 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 00:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/31/09 Posts: 4218 Post Likes: +503 Company: Telematic Systems, Inc. Location: Ft. Myers, FL (KFMY)
Aircraft: Baron E55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He reported 170mph at time of impact. But ATC reported the bird on radar @ 80 mph "RV - traffic - 12 o'clock - opposite direction - same altitude squawking WTF"
_________________ Bill Tassic
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 00:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/10/10 Posts: 270 Post Likes: +14 Company: Spire Flight Solutions Location: Durango, CO
Aircraft: B35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Swallow would have been to far out of aft cg with coconut.
Kent G And running Lean of Beak!!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 18:16 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/14/09 Posts: 745 Post Likes: +9 Location: Chicago, IL (KGYY), GA, KVLD, FL, KOPF
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22 Turbo
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He now reports that the spar is bent. Entire wing needs replacing. wow that's too bad for the bird. How about the plane, does it need to replace its wing too.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 19:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/13/08 Posts: 2418 Post Likes: +648 Location: Bakersfield, CA
Aircraft: 260B Comanche
|
|
I don't know when they switched to solid spars, but he told me that Beech offered to replace wings at no cost and that very few owners opted for this. Username Protected wrote: That's really to bad for this guy. It took me 400 hours to build the wings for my RV and to do another I can't see it taking him less than 175, even having built before. Wow, he must be sick over this. Building a plane is like the guy version of giving birth. A former Beech accident investigator told me that this kind of event would bring down an early Bonanza that doesn't have solid spars. The ram air supposedly would blow the skins off the wing behind the spar like a bomb went off in it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 22:39 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/16/09 Posts: 141 Post Likes: +2
Aircraft: C172
|
|
Some great replys. Maybe this is the real reason Cirrus' have chutes.
_________________ Bob Steinbach Leonardtown MD
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 12 Nov 2010, 23:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/25/10 Posts: 4261 Post Likes: +478 Location: North Myrtle Beach, SC (KCRE)
Aircraft: 1978 Bonanza V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I called PITA to turn this guy in. I think he hit the bird on purpose. Now that's funny!!! It's actually PETA. Around here that stands for: People Eating Tasty Animals
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|