24 Apr 2024, 17:24 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird  Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 21:05 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 03/15/08
Posts: 1427
Post Likes: +254
Location: KUES Waukesha, WI
Aircraft: Pieces of N121VP
|
|
[img] Attachment: long%20view.JPG [/img]
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________
"Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground......"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 21:40 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/07/08
Posts: 1361
Post Likes: +7
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
|
A 10 lb. bird at 250 kts is equivalent to a 10 ton impact.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 22:08 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/07/08
Posts: 1361
Post Likes: +7
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 250 knots? Yeah, first I don't know how fast the RV-10 aircraft flys and secondly its the only number I remember when discussing bird strikes in ground school. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 22:36 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 30754
Post Likes: +10754
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He reported 170mph at time of impact. That should reduce the impact force to a mere 3 tons (based on momentum being proportional to velocity squared).
_________________
-lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 22:52 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 03/10/10
Posts: 270
Post Likes: +14
Company: Spire Flight Solutions
Location: Durango, CO
Aircraft: B35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He reported 170mph at time of impact. That should reduce the impact force to a mere 3 tons (based on momentum being proportional to velocity squared).
To my untrained eye it appears to have been struck by a swallow carrying a coconut, although I won't take a guess on the velocity 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 23:47 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/13/10
Posts: 249
Location: Orlando Fl
Aircraft: BONANZA J35
|
|
|
Swallow would have been to far out of aft cg with coconut.
Kent G
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: RV 10 vs bird Posted: 11 Nov 2010, 23:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/10/10
Posts: 270
Post Likes: +14
Company: Spire Flight Solutions
Location: Durango, CO
Aircraft: B35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: African or European swallow? African swallow, definately
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|
