banner
banner

25 May 2025, 18:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 05 May 2010, 21:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/08
Posts: 2718
Post Likes: +100
Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
I was looking at some panel videos and I was a little surprised at the Matrix preformance numbers. This video shows the Piper running 28.4 MP X 2410 RPMS, fuel flow 19.2-19.3 GPH, altitude 8000', and only 170-172 TAS. Yikes, not very pretty numbers for the amount of fuel flow!

[youtube]http://youtu.be/ZnWjYeFZ_1o[/youtube]


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 05 May 2010, 22:12 
Offline




User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/08
Posts: 5757
Post Likes: +586
Company: Latitude Aviation
Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
Rick, I didn't watch the video but did it show the altitude? Also, remember...you can't run that engine LOP. It isn't as slick as a TAT G36 but it does have quite a bit more room.

-Neal

_________________
Latitude Aviation
Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 05 May 2010, 22:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
- 8000f for cruise is flying lower than most with a TCed aircraft would probably want to be.
- those settings are 65% power, 227hp. TIT is just below 1600 and all the CHTs below 400. He seems to run a bit richer than even Lycoming recommends ;) .


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 06 May 2010, 05:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 06 May 2010, 06:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/08
Posts: 2718
Post Likes: +100
Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
Username Protected wrote:
Rick, I didn't watch the video but did it show the altitude? Also, remember...you can't run that engine LOP. It isn't as slick as a TAT G36 but it does have quite a bit more room.

-Neal


8000'. The Matrix needs altitude. To me, this points out that if you need an all-purpose preformer, the Matrix probably isn't the best choice. It's more mission specific that I thought.

Not having the advantage of running LOP is rough on fuel flow, especially down low.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 06 May 2010, 21:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/19/08
Posts: 3671
Post Likes: +618
Location: Vermont
Aircraft: F33A TAT 550
Username Protected wrote:
After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.


Agreed. Its only pretending to be cabin class. Not much load with full fuel either.

_________________
Happy landings!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 06 May 2010, 22:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/28/09
Posts: 21
Post Likes: +4
Company: JP Trinity Capital Management
Aircraft: Baron 58
Something isn't right with this video, I flew in a Matrix and flies faster, check out the videos below:

[youtube]http://youtu.be/fK_ALv8CXa4[/youtube]


[youtube]http://youtu.be/YqsqyjB1hG0[/youtube]


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 06 May 2010, 22:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6060
Post Likes: +709
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
More room for passengers in the back, not for the crew.

Username Protected wrote:
After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 07 May 2010, 14:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.



Perhaps.

They're wider no doubt. But they're lower on the head room.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 07 May 2010, 14:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/24/09
Posts: 131
Post Likes: +2
Company: Purple 737s
Aircraft: B737, A36
..just looking at that vid reminds me of the lemon Cirrus that we had before the BO...those screens are of lesser quality than a walmart laptop.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010, 14:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/10/08
Posts: 49
Post Likes: +1
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
Saw this post and would be interested to get the BT'ers insight on the Matrix vs. the 58 Baron. My mission is requiring more space than my A-36 Bonanza has (and at times weight). Last trip, 3 adults, three kids and luggage for a week. The Matrix claims a useful load of 1,387 pounds which is pretty close to the Baron and 216 cruise speed (but that is at altitude of 25k and assumes wearing O2 masks, which I can do with adults but not with 3 kids under 6). Has anyone flown the Matrix?

It seems like the Matrix can match or exceed my Bonanza performance at lower altitudes but gives the option of faster speeds and taking advantage of tail winds when solo or when passengers are oxygen capable. The Baron burns nearly twice the fuel, appears to have less passenger and cargo space, but it has twin engine redundancy, Beech quality and flight characteristics and familiarity. Both planes with full fuel can only carry about 400 pounds of stuff, so usually starting with less than full fuel in either case.

Baron would require a new rating and twin proficiency (that is good and bad). Lycoming engines don't seem to need cylinders and pre-TBO engine work as often as the Continentals.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010, 15:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
I have flown neither, but I can add and subtract ;)

Username Protected wrote:
The Baron burns nearly twice the fuel,


I don't think it is quite twice, more like 60% more (32gph vs 20gph). Make sure you factor fuel burn into effective load carrying capacity. 80Gal of fuel in the Matrix gives you 3 hrs + reserve. To get the same endurance in the G58 you'll have to take 300lbs more fuel.

Quote:
Lycoming engines don't seem to need cylinders and pre-TBO engine work as often as the Continentals.


A factory overhaul on a TIO 540 AE2A retails for $85,972 :bugeye:. Dont know why it is THAT expensive, but in addition to two turbochargers, there are apparently a couple of exhaust 'transitions' in there that must be made from solid Rhodium judging by their price.
So your hourly overhaul reserve for the one TIO 540 is going to be similar to two normally aspirated IO 550s.

I would say the maintenance history of all engines in that airframe (TIO520, TIO540, PT6) has been less than favorable. Time will tell whether the Matrix flown at lower altitudes and without the loss of bleed-air for pressurization is going to be better than the Malibu Mirage.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010, 19:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13080
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
I don't think any of the above are good for 3 adult and 3 kids and bags for a week.

I had 4 adults and my son and bags last weekend and it was fine. Add another body and it might be getting tight.

I have 1400lb useful.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010, 19:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/08
Posts: 2718
Post Likes: +100
Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
The advantage that Piper has is the fact you can go to a dealer and get a turn key product. Deice, oxygen, turbo, big fuel tanks....it's available right out of the box.

The Bonanza product requires a lengthy makeover. For me, the Bonanza makes more sense, but you can see why Piper sells to the guy that wants it all right now.

And Piper even has SVT!

Marketing 101......MAKE IT EASY!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010, 20:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8866
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
The advantage that Piper has is the fact you can go to a dealer and get a turn key product. Deice, oxygen, turbo, big fuel tanks....it's available right out of the box.

The Bonanza product requires a lengthy makeover. For me, the Bonanza makes more sense, but you can see why Piper sells to the guy that wants it all right now.


That is something I don't quite understand about HBC. They do sell the King Air with some of the aftermarket stuff already installed, yet on the G36 the owner has to deal with several months of downtime to get the 'whole package' (TAT, tip-tanks, TKS). Also, they have the jigs, TCs approvals to sell a B36 with IO550, TAT and FIKI TKS yet they don't offer it :shrug: .


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.