25 May 2025, 18:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 05 May 2010, 21:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
I was looking at some panel videos and I was a little surprised at the Matrix preformance numbers. This video shows the Piper running 28.4 MP X 2410 RPMS, fuel flow 19.2-19.3 GPH, altitude 8000', and only 170-172 TAS. Yikes, not very pretty numbers for the amount of fuel flow!
[youtube]http://youtu.be/ZnWjYeFZ_1o[/youtube]
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 05 May 2010, 22:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
- 8000f for cruise is flying lower than most with a TCed aircraft would probably want to be. - those settings are 65% power, 227hp. TIT is just below 1600 and all the CHTs below 400. He seems to run a bit richer than even Lycoming recommends  .
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 06 May 2010, 06:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rick, I didn't watch the video but did it show the altitude? Also, remember...you can't run that engine LOP. It isn't as slick as a TAT G36 but it does have quite a bit more room.
-Neal 8000'. The Matrix needs altitude. To me, this points out that if you need an all-purpose preformer, the Matrix probably isn't the best choice. It's more mission specific that I thought. Not having the advantage of running LOP is rough on fuel flow, especially down low.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 06 May 2010, 21:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/19/08 Posts: 3671 Post Likes: +618 Location: Vermont
Aircraft: F33A TAT 550
|
|
Username Protected wrote: After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room. Agreed. Its only pretending to be cabin class. Not much load with full fuel either.
_________________ Happy landings!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 06 May 2010, 22:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +709 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
More room for passengers in the back, not for the crew. Username Protected wrote: After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 07 May 2010, 14:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: After sitting in a Matrix, I don't think the have more room.
Perhaps.
They're wider no doubt. But they're lower on the head room.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 07 May 2010, 14:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/24/09 Posts: 131 Post Likes: +2 Company: Purple 737s
Aircraft: B737, A36
|
|
..just looking at that vid reminds me of the lemon Cirrus that we had before the BO...those screens are of lesser quality than a walmart laptop.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 28 Jul 2010, 15:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
I have flown neither, but I can add and subtract  Username Protected wrote: The Baron burns nearly twice the fuel, I don't think it is quite twice, more like 60% more (32gph vs 20gph). Make sure you factor fuel burn into effective load carrying capacity. 80Gal of fuel in the Matrix gives you 3 hrs + reserve. To get the same endurance in the G58 you'll have to take 300lbs more fuel. Quote: Lycoming engines don't seem to need cylinders and pre-TBO engine work as often as the Continentals. A factory overhaul on a TIO 540 AE2A retails for $85,972  . Dont know why it is THAT expensive, but in addition to two turbochargers, there are apparently a couple of exhaust 'transitions' in there that must be made from solid Rhodium judging by their price. So your hourly overhaul reserve for the one TIO 540 is going to be similar to two normally aspirated IO 550s. I would say the maintenance history of all engines in that airframe (TIO520, TIO540, PT6) has been less than favorable. Time will tell whether the Matrix flown at lower altitudes and without the loss of bleed-air for pressurization is going to be better than the Malibu Mirage.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 28 Jul 2010, 19:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
The advantage that Piper has is the fact you can go to a dealer and get a turn key product. Deice, oxygen, turbo, big fuel tanks....it's available right out of the box.
The Bonanza product requires a lengthy makeover. For me, the Bonanza makes more sense, but you can see why Piper sells to the guy that wants it all right now.
And Piper even has SVT!
Marketing 101......MAKE IT EASY!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Matrix preformance Posted: 28 Jul 2010, 20:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8866 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The advantage that Piper has is the fact you can go to a dealer and get a turn key product. Deice, oxygen, turbo, big fuel tanks....it's available right out of the box.
The Bonanza product requires a lengthy makeover. For me, the Bonanza makes more sense, but you can see why Piper sells to the guy that wants it all right now. That is something I don't quite understand about HBC. They do sell the King Air with some of the aftermarket stuff already installed, yet on the G36 the owner has to deal with several months of downtime to get the 'whole package' (TAT, tip-tanks, TKS). Also, they have the jigs, TCs approvals to sell a B36 with IO550, TAT and FIKI TKS yet they don't offer it  .
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|