19 Apr 2024, 10:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 11:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16187 Post Likes: +8797 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think they'd sell a lot more single turbines if they could get one out that was priced right. They are moving the 350/400 production to Mexico. Who knows, maybe they manage to apply the same concept to their SE turboprop from the get-go and translate that into a more competitive price. This will be interesting to watch.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 11:46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5644 Post Likes: +519 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You called it Rick. What's your source? Hey Jason, I saw this in AOPA's email blast last night. http://www.aopa.org/nbaa/2010/101020mus ... c_sect=gan-Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 11:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +99 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You called it Rick. What's your source? I know guys in Wichita. It's been seen flying.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 12:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5644 Post Likes: +519 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rick called it months ago. Yep, just wanted to post a public source of information. Rick has moles...in high and low places. -Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 12:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rick called it months ago. Yep, just wanted to post a public source of information. Rick has moles...in high and low places. -Neal
Indeed.
Rick is "that guy".
Now, if he could only find some info on the RR500.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 16:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/26/08 Posts: 268 Post Likes: +17 Location: NJ (3N6)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Now, if he could only find some info on the RR500. For what it's worth, there's an article on the Robinson R66 in this month's Flying that shows a really nice pic of the RR300 mounted in the back. 200 lbs and pretty tiny as far as turbines go. Interesting that it only has a centrifugal compressor. They apparently removed the axial flow compressor section to shave cost and complexity. Throw one of those on a Bonanza (or a Cessna for that matter) and we'd be cooking with gas, er. Jet-A.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 16:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/03/10 Posts: 2507 Post Likes: +390 Location: MO
Aircraft: 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm still scratching my head on how they're going to be able to bolt a turboprop onto a mustang airframe without the prop striking the ground (or at least having very minimal prop ground clearance). The mustang sits really low to the ground. IIRC, the Mustang wasn't a true clean sheet design. I believe Pelton mentioned it was derived from a 1990s twin TP design. Just jack up the gears a few inches. Piece o' cake.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 18:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Now, if he could only find some info on the RR500. For what it's worth, there's an article on the Robinson R66 in this month's Flying that shows a really nice pic of the RR300 mounted in the back. 200 lbs and pretty tiny as far as turbines go. Interesting that it only has a centrifugal compressor. They apparently removed the axial flow compressor section to shave cost and complexity. Throw one of those on a Bonanza (or a Cessna for that matter) and we'd be cooking with gas, er. Jet-A.
I did read that article. But that Turbine Robinson isn't exactly cheap.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Cessna Turbine Posted: 22 Oct 2010, 18:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sierra Industries, which re-engines early Citations with Williams FJ44s, is an absolute killer value in the price range ballpark under discussion. http://www.sijet.com/fj44EagleII_fj44su ... ining.aspxHow much? I take back what I said about the R66 Helicopter. I jus re-read the article and that RR300 is bad ass and not that expensive.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|