banner
banner

24 Apr 2024, 19:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 16:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 6323
Post Likes: +3811
Location: San Carlos, CA - KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:

Depends on the distance and wind. But here is a very normal flight for me.

I would note that the items you underlined, one is Flaps at Takeoff, one is Flaps up. I assume you only hold takeoff flaps for a few hundred feet. If you compare the Max climb at flaps 0 vs cruise climb at flaps 0, you get a better climb rate by 20%, albeit 50 kias slower.

Given the speed difference, I could see for the PC12 a cruise climb probably makes sense to spend a little fuel and reduce the number of airframe hours.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 16:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/13/14
Posts: 382
Post Likes: +327
Location: New Hampshire
Aircraft: PC-24
Username Protected wrote:

Depends on the distance and wind. But here is a very normal flight for me.

I would note that the items you underlined, one is Flaps at Takeoff, one is Flaps up. I assume you only hold takeoff flaps for a few hundred feet. If you compare the Max climb at flaps 0 vs cruise climb at flaps 0, you get a better climb rate by 20%, albeit 50 kias slower.

Given the speed difference, I could see for the PC12 a cruise climb probably makes sense to spend a little fuel and reduce the number of airframe hours.


You can only take off with flaps 15 or 30. Flaps 0 is not authorized. Flaps 15 until 1000, and during that climbing at max rate, which is 95 knots.

*was trying to box in the flaps 0 max climb to the cruise climb, not underline flaps 15 climb.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 18:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2899
Post Likes: +3608
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Taking off at Vy can be pretty rough on passengers in the back of an SETP. Yesterday, I took off light and cold, just myself. I rotated up 15° and was almost 1000 ft. AGL by the end of the runway, and then leveled off into a cruise climb at 140 indicated. I was in the flight levels six minutes after rotation. Had I had passengers in the rear facing seats, they would be pretty unhappy. In the real world I climb at 140 indicated below FL200 and 130 indicated from there to FL300 if needed. Usually I stop at FL 260 or 270. That is a sweet spot for the Meridian or M600.

Attachment:
67224910-99E5-4076-AA42-4B49949D25A9.jpeg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 18:56 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 8463
Post Likes: +3713
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
IAS climb is THE safest way to climb. High altitude stalls are no joke and with IAS mode it is impossible to stall if you get distracted.


Agreed, would love to hear why the others on this thread don't like it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 19:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/09
Posts: 332
Post Likes: +272
Company: Premier Bone and Joint
Location: Wyoming
Aircraft: BE90,HUSK,MU-2
I use IAS climb in the Mits as well (180 to 10K, 170 10K to FL200, 160 above FL200). But my plane’s AP can’t be programmed to hold a specific IAS so I do it in pitch mode and adjust as needed. Many years ago I had a T210 with a 55X AP that could hold climb and descent rate, but not IAS. I flew west into mountain wave at cruise climb power and just sat there watching to see what would happen. The deck angle and stall horn were pretty hard to miss as the AP tried to pitch up to hold rate, but eventually it did stall.
Since I’ve never flown a plane with an AP that can hold IAS, in that situation, does the AP pitch down and descend at the set IAS even though you were previously set to climb? If that is the case, it sounds like the best of both worlds for safety (as long as you notify ATC that what goes up, must come down).

_________________
Thomas


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 19:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4485
Post Likes: +3265
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
I use IAS climb in the Mits as well (180 to 10K, 170 10K to FL200, 160 above FL200). But my plane’s AP can’t be programmed to hold a specific IAS so I do it in pitch mode and adjust as needed. Many years ago I had a T210 with a 55X AP that could hold climb and descent rate, but not IAS. I flew west into mountain wave at cruise climb power and just sat there watching to see what would happen. The deck angle and stall horn were pretty hard to miss as the AP tried to pitch up to hold rate, but eventually it did stall.
Since I’ve never flown a plane with an AP that can hold IAS, in that situation, does the AP pitch down and descend at the set IAS even though you were previously set to climb? If that is the case, it sounds like the best of both worlds for safety (as long as you notify ATC that what goes up, must come down).


Depends on the unit, but in my experience it will pitch for locked airspeed regardless, I also used it for best glide, pitch for speed, IAS, direct to nearest, run memory items and checks time permitting, if your nearest requirements are properly set


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 31 Jan 2023, 22:48 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 13588
Post Likes: +10972
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
I blame Hangen :duck:


I am here to serve. :peace:

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 05:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 849
Post Likes: +661
Username Protected wrote:
IAS climb is THE safest way to climb. High altitude stalls are no joke and with IAS mode it is impossible to stall if you get distracted.


Agreed, would love to hear why the others on this thread don't like it.


If the pitot tube becomes blocked due to icing, in IAS mode it will continue to pull the nose up as the plane climbs due to the decrease in atmospheric pressure into a stall when climbing and when descending it will continue to push the nose down into an overspeed due to the increasing pressure. I use IAS on my climbs and VS on my descents, none of the AP modes are perfect, you just have to know the limitations and what abnormal cues to look for.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 07:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 911
Post Likes: +449
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: CE525,PA31
Username Protected wrote:
Agreed, would love to hear why the others on this thread don't like it.


I don’t like it above FL300, in the various C525 (except in the CJ4) series they tend to porpoise, hunting for the speed, not comfortable for the PAX.

I use vertical speed till late FL20s then pitch mode.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 08:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/11/11
Posts: 1102
Post Likes: +564
Company: FUSION
Aircraft: B300ER B200 C90 DHC6
In the B350 I usually climb in VFLC (or FLC) mode. Often, slightly increasing the default/recommended climb speeds (at altitude) with the SPEED knob in order to reduce the airplane pitch angle for better cooling of the engines and for PAX comfort.

FLC mode is different from the IAS mode in earlier autopilots.

Tied to the ALT Preselected, the FLC button, or mode, in Pro Line 21 & Fusion replaces three previous buttons (or modes): CLIMB, DSC and IAS.

Worth reading:

https://kingairmagazine.com/article/2998/

https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/systems/vs-mode-and-flc-mode-correct-use/


Last edited on 01 Feb 2023, 11:01, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 09:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/18
Posts: 2233
Post Likes: +1724
Location: NH
Aircraft: F33A, A320
There have been zero fatalities following engine failures in PC-12's. The same cannot be said about the King Air Family.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 10:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6074
Post Likes: +4651
Username Protected wrote:
There have been zero fatalities following engine failures in PC-12's. The same cannot be said about the King Air Family.


Probably many millions more engine flight hours in the KA fleet though


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 10:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/18
Posts: 2233
Post Likes: +1724
Location: NH
Aircraft: F33A, A320
Username Protected wrote:
There have been zero fatalities following engine failures in PC-12's. The same cannot be said about the King Air Family.


Probably many millions more engine flight hours in the KA fleet though


Yup, but I would gander that the PC-12 is still safer post engine failure. There have been some very dramatic King Air crashes on takeoff following engine failure, flown by well trained professional crews in the past decade or so.

I have about 2500 hours in the PC-12, about 50 in a King Air 200. Both great airplanes, and there were a few times that I wish I had a second engine in the PC-12, but I felt that overall the PC-12 was a much better single pilot airplane, especially the NextGen aircraft.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 10:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6074
Post Likes: +4651
Username Protected wrote:

Yup, but I would gander that the PC-12 is still safer post engine failure. There have been some very dramatic King Air crashes on takeoff following engine failure, flown by well trained professional crews in the past decade or so.


…350’s, which seem to have a unique challenge with those large engines that far out on the wing and the AP servo driven rudder boost

Let’s not group all KA into that bucket


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bought a PC-12 - still miss the B200!
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2023, 10:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/18
Posts: 2233
Post Likes: +1724
Location: NH
Aircraft: F33A, A320
Username Protected wrote:

Yup, but I would gander that the PC-12 is still safer post engine failure. There have been some very dramatic King Air crashes on takeoff following engine failure, flown by well trained professional crews in the past decade or so.


…350’s, which seem to have a unique challenge with those large engines that far out on the wing and the AP servo driven rudder boost

Let’s not group all KA into that bucket


The crash into FlightSafety ICT was a 200, as was the recent crash in Rockford.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 19  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.concorde.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.