banner
banner

28 Mar 2024, 19:57 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 14:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 12813
Post Likes: +13206
Company: Cogswell Cogs, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
US Special Operations Command chooses L3Harris' Sky Warden for Armed Overwatch effort. It will replace the U-28 (PC-12)

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/08 ... ch-effort/

_________________
Life is a DiY project.


Last edited on 02 Aug 2022, 14:19, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 14:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/06/12
Posts: 2290
Post Likes: +2114
Company: FlightRepublic
Location: Bee Cave, TX
Aircraft: DA40, C182
Launching a new breed of military taildragger pilots.
:thumbup:

_________________
Antoni Deighton
contactlink.to/antoni.deighton


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 14:12 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/14/18
Posts: 953
Post Likes: +1310
Company: USAF
Location: Barksdale AFB, LA (KDTN)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
Glad we are getting this "New" platform... next there will be a news release about our combat caravans.

_________________
1967 V35
1974 AA5


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 14:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/14/19
Posts: 673
Post Likes: +581
Location: MCW
Aircraft: 7ECA
I think they missed the opportunity to call it the A-1(X) Skyraider II.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 16:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/17
Posts: 1163
Post Likes: +1820
Location: KOLV
Aircraft: A36, 767
Will be interesting to see if this actually is a replacement for the U-28, for US crews to operate, or if it's a platform to be used in the AvFID mission to bolster African nations' counter-terrorism capabilities. The fact that they chose the AT-802, which is probably slower, noisier (more drag), more forgiving to fly, probably can't go as high, and is simpler maintenance than the others bolsters that possibility. We've successfully used this platform with the AvFID mission before. But, it's got two sensor balls, which is a HUGE improvement over one and vital to some modern tactics, so maybe it will be a US-operated platform.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/afsoc-he ... es.428230/


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 16:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 12813
Post Likes: +13206
Company: Cogswell Cogs, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
SOCOM Commander mentions five squadrons of 15 planes, each. The U-28 will apparently be kept for ISR missions.

_________________
Life is a DiY project.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 17:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/14/19
Posts: 673
Post Likes: +581
Location: MCW
Aircraft: 7ECA
Username Protected wrote:
Will be interesting to see if this actually is a replacement for the U-28, for US crews to operate, or if it's a platform to be used in the AvFID mission to bolster African nations' counter-terrorism capabilities. The fact that they chose the AT-802, which is probably slower, noisier (more drag), more forgiving to fly, probably can't go as high, and is simpler maintenance than the others bolsters that possibility. We've successfully used this platform with the AvFID mission before. But, it's got two sensor balls, which is a HUGE improvement over one and vital to some modern tactics, so maybe it will be a US-operated platform.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/afsoc-he ... es.428230/


I could be wrong, but I thought the U-28 was mainly a sensor platform. This AT-802 has teeth.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 17:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/17
Posts: 1163
Post Likes: +1820
Location: KOLV
Aircraft: A36, 767
Username Protected wrote:
SOCOM Commander mentions five squadrons of 15 planes, each. The U-28 will apparently be kept for ISR missions.


USSOCOM is a supported COCOM; they don't own bodies, they are provided bodies by the services whose job is to train and equip. So, unless those squadrons are going to be contractor operated, paid with USSOCOM funds, the services have to be on-board, because they'll have to provide all of the crews, mx personnel, training, etc. If these are joint squadrons, USAF and USN (and USA if they play, but all the testing thus far, going back to 2008 at least, has been USN primarily with USAF participation) will share the bill. If AFSOC squadrons, USAF foots the entire bill. Big USAF/USN have to be on board to cough up more bodies to SOF; if not, NSW and AFSOC have to take it out of hide.

As far as keeping both U-28's and the AT-802, that will be a REALLY big sell; crazier things have happened, but I wouldn't bet on it. USAF isn't giving AFSOC all the bodies they want (need) for just the number of C-130 platforms they want (need), now USAF will have to cough up more? Or, AFSOC will have to take out of hide more? And AFSOC and USAF already want out of the tactical ISR business; there's a reason why the MC-12/Project Liberty went to ANG....because there was no appetite for the AD services to keep that mission and OKC just happened to be a unit without an airplane. Maybe some of those AT-802 squadrons will be ANG/AFRC? That's one solution. But, logical solutions aren't the strong suit of these decision-making processes.

It's telling there hasn't been more released on this. Where are the announcements of bed-down locations like there were with the F-35, KC-46, etc? What about the environmental impact statements for new squadrons? Are they being done? They may be, but no announcements. Given the rapid IOE date, I'd have expected more along those lines.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 17:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/17
Posts: 1163
Post Likes: +1820
Location: KOLV
Aircraft: A36, 767
Username Protected wrote:

I could be wrong, but I thought the U-28 was mainly a sensor platform. This AT-802 has teeth.


The U-28 is a capable aircraft. But, without getting into specific capabilities, there's more to those missions than just strike platforms (IMINT, SIGINT, C2 Datalink, etc). There are multiple platforms serving multiple roles, all required for a successful mission. See the link below for an idea of the complexity of SOF missions......and know that these vignettes are dumbed down for simplicity and classification.

Regarding my statement of surprise they went with this platform, I was referencing the other two "leading" options of the Super Tucano and Beechcraft AT-6, which are both just as well armed. DoD has been doing extensive testing with both of those platforms, even lost a USN pilot to a crash while testing the Super Tucano on the White Sands Missile Range, but hardly any testing with the AT-802 relative to the other two. The AT may have capabilities that I am not aware of (Ku Band, etc), and I do see it has two sensor balls, so that is a big win if the others don't.

https://www.airforcemag.com/article/rem ... e-warfare/


Last edited on 02 Aug 2022, 19:36, edited 2 times in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 18:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/17
Posts: 1163
Post Likes: +1820
Location: KOLV
Aircraft: A36, 767
Username Protected wrote:
I think they missed the opportunity to call it the A-1(X) Skyraider II.


Whomever chooses these names has no sense of history.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your ... bat-plane/


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 18:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12798
Post Likes: +5224
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Username Protected wrote:

The U-28 is a capable aircraft. But, without getting into specific capabilities, there's more to those missions than just strike platforms.


The United States operates armed PC12's? Can this be answered true or false?


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 20:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/04/14
Posts: 3316
Post Likes: +2601
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Aircraft: A320
True.

U-28

_________________
ATP-AMEL Comm- ASEL Helicopter
CFI/II-H MEI/II
A320 B737 B757 B767 BE300 S-70
A320 Type 02/2022


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 20:46 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 8012
Post Likes: +5715
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
Username Protected wrote:

The U-28 is a capable aircraft. But, without getting into specific capabilities, there's more to those missions than just strike platforms.


The United States operates armed PC12's? Can this be answered true or false?


I don't think they're armed. As near as I can make out, they have sensors for intelligence and recon and targeting, but don't carry weapons themselves.

This deal strikes me as throwing a bone to L3/Air Tractor to get them to drop their lawsuit over the competition with the AT-6 and A-29. You can stick any sensor package on any of those planes, and the 802 is way slower and has no ejection seats. The AT-6 and A-29 are proven platforms that are much faster, and USAF already has training and infrastructure in place to support the AT-6.

The one advantage the Air Tractor has is that it seems to have a longer loiter time. But then it needs it, because it's barely faster than a Bonanza.

Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 02 Aug 2022, 22:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/17
Posts: 1163
Post Likes: +1820
Location: KOLV
Aircraft: A36, 767
Longer loiter and almost 5,000lb more capacity, and 3 sensor pods (not two as I said above), based on what I read.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SOCOM chooses the AT-802 for armed overwatch
PostPosted: 03 Aug 2022, 06:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12798
Post Likes: +5224
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
I have zero understanding of military flight dynamics…

But seems like an air tractors proven ability to operate and be supported in very austere environments would be useful even if they’re slow.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.CiESVer2.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.pure-medical-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.