25 Apr 2024, 13:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 26 Jul 2022, 04:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/30/22 Posts: 1399 Post Likes: +739 Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
|
|
Looks good, feels good, chick dig them. It was a pretty good idea, just fell short. If Porsche had supported it and upgraded, it could have been a game changer.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 26 Jul 2022, 08:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/14/14 Posts: 723 Post Likes: +439 Location: KPHF
Aircraft: D95A, Long EZ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looks good, feels good, chick dig them. It was a pretty good idea, just fell short. If Porsche had supported it and upgraded, it could have been a game changer. Totally agree. It was an innovative idea that was ahead of its time. Compare the different generations of Cirrus. The latest ones are significantly improved from the original.
_________________ Paul Travel Air 2705T Long EZ 214LP
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 26 Jul 2022, 10:09 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 4702 Post Likes: +2705
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
I guess, but I thought "lycoming", "continental" and "mooney" had more cache than Porsche. Porsches don't even fly... Username Protected wrote: Because … branding is a very powerful marketing tool.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 26 Jul 2022, 12:22 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 2693 Post Likes: +1804 Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm curious, why did anyone buy them? Other posters have mentioned all the bad things, what was good? It’s like one of the car magazines back in the day reporting on the Porsche 914. After listing all their complaints with the vehicle, at the end of the article they excused it all by proclaiming “but it is a Porsche”. To many people, the name plate is worth more than what’s under it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 01 Aug 2022, 18:58 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/15/10 Posts: 690 Post Likes: +98 Location: Atlanta
Aircraft: 77' B55
|
|
I think it had a lower max weight too. So even if you were lucky and got rid of the Porsche motor you still didn’t have much of a plane. I can’t remember if the modworks swap delt with that.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 01 Aug 2022, 20:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/03/12 Posts: 2126 Post Likes: +566 Location: Wichita, KS
Aircraft: Mooney 201
|
|
Some of the Modworks conversions got a GWI, and some didn't. I wasn't an owner/active in the community at the time of this, but have been observing for the last 15+ years now. I don't know if the GWI (essentially up to the later longbody Mooneys weight) was awarded after conversions started or not.
Over the years I've seen a few IO-550 converted M20L's that look great for an attractive price. In general, the aftermarket-modified Mooneys (like these converted PFM's, as well as Rocket Engineering Missile & Rocket conversions, or Modworks "262" or other similar upgrades) go for quite a bit less than the newer factory versions...partly due to older airframe and partly due to the stigma of a "mod." Digging deeper into the cheap M20L conversions reveals they never got the GWI above 2900 lbs, so their useful load was 6xx lbs! Very, very limiting with big tanks and a 550 to feed! I don't know if owners just routinely flew overgross or not... performance is certainly there at 3200 lbs or the modern 3368 lbs limit, and the airframe can certainly handle it, but not legal.
For reference, the midbody J model/201 like I have, started with a GW of 2740 lbs and had a 200 hp IO-360 and 64 gallon standard tanks. Later production models got fat (just like Beech!) and Mooney bumped max gross weight to 2900 lbs in ~1989 IIRC. The PFM M20L I believe had the same max gross weight, but with the longer fuselage, heavier engine, and essentially the same 200 hp rating. It was slower and I believe burned more fuel than the J model, which is why it failed. But it did usher in the longbody era for Mooney that turned into the successful M20M TLS/Bravo with the 270 hp TIO-540, and later the Ovation with the IO-550 and Acclaim...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 01 Aug 2022, 20:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/04/14 Posts: 1790 Post Likes: +804 Location: FREDERICKSBURG TX
Aircraft: MOONEY M20TN
|
|
What later gave the M20M a gross weight increase was the addition to dual puck brakes. That never was offered as a retrofit for the M20L (which is the same airframe as the M20M).
I flew an early M20M that didn't yet have the brake upgrade and the stopping power was not great if you were heavy. I had a couple of later M20M's with the brake upgrade and they stopped well.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Mooney M20L (Porsche engine) Posted: 02 Aug 2022, 20:43 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/04/14 Posts: 1790 Post Likes: +804 Location: FREDERICKSBURG TX
Aircraft: MOONEY M20TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The dual puck brakes (and changing engine specs to -SB) gains a 130 pound GWI for the 252 also. The Gross Weight increase on the Mooney Encore over the Mooney 252 was 230 pounds, not 130.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|