banner
banner

20 Apr 2024, 03:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 13:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/30/09
Posts: 1517
Post Likes: +859
Cessna 414A


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Former Taco Chef
Now - Battery Salesman
No Engineering Skills
I don’t know what I don’t know


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 14:28 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 6755
Post Likes: +4417
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
The 414A has a very different wing than a tip tank 414.

I will still take a 421C over a 414A , I like the extra useful load, climb performance and noise level.

A 421C that is in GOOD CONDITION will do 80% of what a C90 will do on half the cost.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 15:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12799
Post Likes: +5226
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Username Protected wrote:
[the plane that you have] that is in GOOD CONDITION will do 80% of what [the plane that you want] will do on half the cost.


Robertson's 2nd Rule of Aviation


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 15:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/19/09
Posts: 1356
Post Likes: +810
Location: Wright Brother Award
Aircraft: BE300 LR-JET DA-50
It is still any old King Air job, regardless of all the above.

_________________
Gami Serial# 0019
https://www.ebay.com/itm/333888896163 ☜☜☜Battery charger for Garmin® 496


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 16:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3453
Post Likes: +2397
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
Hey Clint, I was impressed by the numbers on the Mustang, but I was having a hard time wrapping my head around the Subscriptions @ $5000. I’m sure data and XM, but curious what pushed it so high?

I know it’s a Mickey Mouse question, but just curious.

Would love to have a Mustang!

$5k is a ballpark number, but here’s what’s in it.
$1500 G1000 subscription.
$1500 SierraTrax maintenance tracking.
$1200+ XM weather and music (rounded off)
$900+/- ForeFlight pro w/runway analysis.

I dropped Cescom a few years ago and went with SierraTrax for 1/4 the cost and dropped Cessna CPCalc for runway analysis and switched to ForeFlight for a better product at less expense. Still, a jet will take $5k in subscriptions at a minimum.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 19:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/18/13
Posts: 460
Post Likes: +77
Company: Gray
Location: Lexington, KY
Aircraft: C-210N
Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 03 Apr 2022, 23:13 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3453
Post Likes: +2397
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi.

Right. It depends on what you subscribe to. I have the lower 48 plus Jepp charts with the full meal deal on mine. Safe Taxi, Obstacles, Airport Directory, etc.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2022, 09:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/17
Posts: 1694
Post Likes: +1161
Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
It is slow, noisy cabin and not real efficient but there is something beyond the numbers about the Kingair missed here

It’s a truck. I pack in people, bags, fuel. CG is not a problem. Useful load on a 600 mile trip is not a problem.

Ice, dark, starting unassisted cold, rough air, cabin room, seat comfort, lighting, grass taxiways.

Easy cabin door size, ramp presence is ok to nervous passengers, having two engines is noticed by non pilot passengers.

Day in day out, long trips to land at short dark runways when tired. Roll it in the hangar and back out in the morning and go. Yep it breaks but I have not had to abort a trip where I could not work around the problem. Mostly old avionics have been the problems.

Biggest trouble has been going back to redo work performed because it was not done correctly or overhauled components that did not work out of the box. But it’s not the airplanes fault for that. We got through it eventually.

Leaving in a few hours for nonstop from N27 Bradford co PA nonstop to Marco Island FL MKY and return to 76N tomorrow AM nonstop also. 1000NM each way. 5.1 hrs down and 4.6 back. Light winds help. Can’t always make it non stop with the 100 knot headwinds I have seen this winter. I also regularly go 76N to PHL or Baltimore at 7000 ft plus planning on 5 trips to Raleigh area next month. Long short and medium trips. Frequently held down low in NYC area by ATC and pulled back to maneuvering speed or less in the rough air. High VA is needed. Asymmetric power has been very helpful on glare ice and our runway surfaces in the winter. But I sure do miss the 421 control feel and quiet.

Why I went from the 421B and B80 Queenair to the E90 Kingair. As it was said above the 421 is 80% of the Kingair but 1/2 the price. Yet I found I needed the next 20% more and more. I got the 421 to TBO without having to pull any cylinders and it was very reliable but kids and later grand kids of the passengers got bigger. ATC became less cooperative for a non spoiler 421 descent. I could not add spoilers because it was a Robertson STOL airplane.

I needed a low purchase price, reliable, all weather, rough ground capable, big cabin, load hauling tank not a race car. Kingair series is not the cheapest, fastest or best for one mission but it is what we picked to do a wide range of trips and I would get the exact same airplane again if I had to.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2022, 17:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/20/15
Posts: 563
Post Likes: +315
Location: KFAT
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi.


Not all G1000 subscriptions are priced the same. Bigger planes are sometimes 2-3x over a piston G1000 subscription. Same product bundle


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2022, 17:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6072
Post Likes: +4650
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi.


Not all G1000 subscriptions are priced the same. Bigger planes are sometimes 2-3x over a piston G1000 subscription. Same product bundle


My piston single g3x system cost same as my turbine twin g1000 subscription

Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 04 Apr 2022, 17:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3453
Post Likes: +2397
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Yes, it depends on the content. Many variables

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 05 Apr 2022, 12:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/11
Posts: 990
Post Likes: +638
Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80
Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
Username Protected wrote:
From my thread on the 414A vs 421C i received several suggestions to consider the MU-2. That got me thinking more generally. What problem am I trying to solve? So, I am interested in feedback on best plane for the following mission:

6 people (pilot + 5 passengers - or 4 with a co-pilot) = 1,020 lbs
240 lbs luggage
600 nm typical trip, though some will be as short as 200 nm
Region: St. Louis based, with flights to Denver, Anne Arbor, Charlotte, Dallas
Lav onboard: if block time exceeds 2.5 hrs. In other words, no potty is needed if block time less than 2.5 hrs.

Primary considerations: Passenger comfort, dispatch rate, low operating costs
Not as important: block time or speed

What aircraft would you suggest? We can be flexible on acquisition costs, since capital is not hard to come by, but ongoing OPEX needs to be kept as low as possible. Also, many of these flights will be owner flown, though some may include a safety pilot for the foreseeable future.

I really need to stress passenger comfort. For this to work, the 4/5 passengers should feel they are riding in something more akin to a limo than a farm tractor - while not breaking my monthly operating budget. Is this too much to ask?

Vic.


You might want to ride in some new John Deere Cabs with front axle suspension. :peace:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 15 Apr 2022, 13:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/14/11
Posts: 831
Post Likes: +577
Username Protected wrote:
From my thread on the 414A vs 421C i received several suggestions to consider the MU-2. That got me thinking more generally. What problem am I trying to solve? So, I am interested in feedback on best plane for the following mission:

6 people (pilot + 5 passengers - or 4 with a co-pilot) = 1,020 lbs
240 lbs luggage
600 nm typical trip, though some will be as short as 200 nm
Region: St. Louis based, with flights to Denver, Anne Arbor, Charlotte, Dallas
Lav onboard: if block time exceeds 2.5 hrs. In other words, no potty is needed if block time less than 2.5 hrs.

Primary considerations: Passenger comfort, dispatch rate, low operating costs
Not as important: block time or speed

What aircraft would you suggest? We can be flexible on acquisition costs, since capital is not hard to come by, but ongoing OPEX needs to be kept as low as possible. Also, many of these flights will be owner flown, though some may include a safety pilot for the foreseeable future.

I really need to stress passenger comfort. For this to work, the 4/5 passengers should feel they are riding in something more akin to a limo than a farm tractor - while not breaking my monthly operating budget. Is this too much to ask?

Vic.


You might want to ride in some new John Deere Cabs with front axle suspension. :peace:


Ha, Ha... this is so true! The newer JD and Claas Combines have such a better cockpit and ride than any plane I've ever flown... from the Cubs to the widebodies. :lol: Kind of sad really.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2022, 23:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2895
Post Likes: +3603
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
Well, I don't know how to edit my original post, but maybe the topic should read: Best plane for 4 people, 600nm. It seems that 5-6 people is a tipping point that drives a massive step change in costs.

I think my original intent exceeds my finances. One option for us is simply to limit who travels GA. I can have junior staff fly commercial as necessary. If we cut this down to a 4-seater mission, with all else staying the same, does this simply become an SR-22 or DA-62 thread?

Vic


Now you are squarely in Meridian territory, and if they are normal BMI types even Malibu/Mirage. SR 22 is a little on the smaller side for 4 people that may not be intimate with each other, and hard to climb above weather for business use where you may want dispatch reliability. Unless you can convince them to use the nose hoses. Same with the DA62. But 4 people 600 nm opens up more options. Need 200+ knots to keep travel time to a 3 hr. bladder time without a lav.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2022, 06:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +255
Aircraft: eclipse
Username Protected wrote:
Idk about post-covid, but F model mu2’s used to be similarly priced to 414/421

Fuel cost/nm also similar


Well, 58 gph at 260 KTAS is about double what I’m using in the 414 at 200 KTAS. Yes, I could bump up fuel flow to 35 GPH to go a few knots faster, maybe 205?

MU-2: 260 KTAS / 58 GPH = 4.5 NM per gal
C414: 200 KTAS / 30 GPH = 6.7 NM per gal (50% improvement)

MU-2: 1 / 4.5 = 0.22 gal per NM * $5 = $1.1 per NM
C414: 1 / 6.7 = 0.15 gal per NM * $6 = $0.90 per NM

***************
Cessna Citation Mustang:

330 KTAS / 75 GPH = 4.4 NM per gal
1 / 4.4 = 0.23 gal per NM * $5 = $1.14 per NM


An Eclipse was actually designed for this mission
EA50 357 KTAS / 54 GPH = 6.7 NM per gal
1 / 6.7 = 0.15 gal per NM * $5 = $0.75 per NM

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.Wingman 85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.