20 Apr 2024, 03:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 03 Apr 2022, 15:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12799 Post Likes: +5226 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [the plane that you have] that is in GOOD CONDITION will do 80% of what [the plane that you want] will do on half the cost. Robertson's 2nd Rule of Aviation
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 03 Apr 2022, 16:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3453 Post Likes: +2397 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hey Clint, I was impressed by the numbers on the Mustang, but I was having a hard time wrapping my head around the Subscriptions @ $5000. I’m sure data and XM, but curious what pushed it so high?
I know it’s a Mickey Mouse question, but just curious.
Would love to have a Mustang! $5k is a ballpark number, but here’s what’s in it. $1500 G1000 subscription. $1500 SierraTrax maintenance tracking. $1200+ XM weather and music (rounded off) $900+/- ForeFlight pro w/runway analysis. I dropped Cescom a few years ago and went with SierraTrax for 1/4 the cost and dropped Cessna CPCalc for runway analysis and switched to ForeFlight for a better product at less expense. Still, a jet will take $5k in subscriptions at a minimum.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 03 Apr 2022, 19:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/18/13 Posts: 460 Post Likes: +77 Company: Gray Location: Lexington, KY
Aircraft: C-210N
|
|
Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 03 Apr 2022, 23:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3453 Post Likes: +2397 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi. Right. It depends on what you subscribe to. I have the lower 48 plus Jepp charts with the full meal deal on mine. Safe Taxi, Obstacles, Airport Directory, etc.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 04 Apr 2022, 09:01 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 1694 Post Likes: +1161 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
It is slow, noisy cabin and not real efficient but there is something beyond the numbers about the Kingair missed here
It’s a truck. I pack in people, bags, fuel. CG is not a problem. Useful load on a 600 mile trip is not a problem.
Ice, dark, starting unassisted cold, rough air, cabin room, seat comfort, lighting, grass taxiways.
Easy cabin door size, ramp presence is ok to nervous passengers, having two engines is noticed by non pilot passengers.
Day in day out, long trips to land at short dark runways when tired. Roll it in the hangar and back out in the morning and go. Yep it breaks but I have not had to abort a trip where I could not work around the problem. Mostly old avionics have been the problems.
Biggest trouble has been going back to redo work performed because it was not done correctly or overhauled components that did not work out of the box. But it’s not the airplanes fault for that. We got through it eventually.
Leaving in a few hours for nonstop from N27 Bradford co PA nonstop to Marco Island FL MKY and return to 76N tomorrow AM nonstop also. 1000NM each way. 5.1 hrs down and 4.6 back. Light winds help. Can’t always make it non stop with the 100 knot headwinds I have seen this winter. I also regularly go 76N to PHL or Baltimore at 7000 ft plus planning on 5 trips to Raleigh area next month. Long short and medium trips. Frequently held down low in NYC area by ATC and pulled back to maneuvering speed or less in the rough air. High VA is needed. Asymmetric power has been very helpful on glare ice and our runway surfaces in the winter. But I sure do miss the 421 control feel and quiet.
Why I went from the 421B and B80 Queenair to the E90 Kingair. As it was said above the 421 is 80% of the Kingair but 1/2 the price. Yet I found I needed the next 20% more and more. I got the 421 to TBO without having to pull any cylinders and it was very reliable but kids and later grand kids of the passengers got bigger. ATC became less cooperative for a non spoiler 421 descent. I could not add spoilers because it was a Robertson STOL airplane. I needed a low purchase price, reliable, all weather, rough ground capable, big cabin, load hauling tank not a race car. Kingair series is not the cheapest, fastest or best for one mission but it is what we picked to do a wide range of trips and I would get the exact same airplane again if I had to.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 04 Apr 2022, 17:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 563 Post Likes: +315 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi. Not all G1000 subscriptions are priced the same. Bigger planes are sometimes 2-3x over a piston G1000 subscription. Same product bundle
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 04 Apr 2022, 17:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6072 Post Likes: +4650
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks Clint. I was surprised the data premium for G1000 vs my G3X, 750xi/650xi. Not all G1000 subscriptions are priced the same. Bigger planes are sometimes 2-3x over a piston G1000 subscription. Same product bundle
My piston single g3x system cost same as my turbine twin g1000 subscription
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 05 Apr 2022, 12:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/31/11 Posts: 990 Post Likes: +638 Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80 Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: From my thread on the 414A vs 421C i received several suggestions to consider the MU-2. That got me thinking more generally. What problem am I trying to solve? So, I am interested in feedback on best plane for the following mission:
6 people (pilot + 5 passengers - or 4 with a co-pilot) = 1,020 lbs 240 lbs luggage 600 nm typical trip, though some will be as short as 200 nm Region: St. Louis based, with flights to Denver, Anne Arbor, Charlotte, Dallas Lav onboard: if block time exceeds 2.5 hrs. In other words, no potty is needed if block time less than 2.5 hrs.
Primary considerations: Passenger comfort, dispatch rate, low operating costs Not as important: block time or speed
What aircraft would you suggest? We can be flexible on acquisition costs, since capital is not hard to come by, but ongoing OPEX needs to be kept as low as possible. Also, many of these flights will be owner flown, though some may include a safety pilot for the foreseeable future.
I really need to stress passenger comfort. For this to work, the 4/5 passengers should feel they are riding in something more akin to a limo than a farm tractor - while not breaking my monthly operating budget. Is this too much to ask?
Vic. You might want to ride in some new John Deere Cabs with front axle suspension.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 15 Apr 2022, 13:16 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/14/11 Posts: 831 Post Likes: +577
|
|
Username Protected wrote: From my thread on the 414A vs 421C i received several suggestions to consider the MU-2. That got me thinking more generally. What problem am I trying to solve? So, I am interested in feedback on best plane for the following mission:
6 people (pilot + 5 passengers - or 4 with a co-pilot) = 1,020 lbs 240 lbs luggage 600 nm typical trip, though some will be as short as 200 nm Region: St. Louis based, with flights to Denver, Anne Arbor, Charlotte, Dallas Lav onboard: if block time exceeds 2.5 hrs. In other words, no potty is needed if block time less than 2.5 hrs.
Primary considerations: Passenger comfort, dispatch rate, low operating costs Not as important: block time or speed
What aircraft would you suggest? We can be flexible on acquisition costs, since capital is not hard to come by, but ongoing OPEX needs to be kept as low as possible. Also, many of these flights will be owner flown, though some may include a safety pilot for the foreseeable future.
I really need to stress passenger comfort. For this to work, the 4/5 passengers should feel they are riding in something more akin to a limo than a farm tractor - while not breaking my monthly operating budget. Is this too much to ask?
Vic. You might want to ride in some new John Deere Cabs with front axle suspension.
Ha, Ha... this is so true! The newer JD and Claas Combines have such a better cockpit and ride than any plane I've ever flown... from the Cubs to the widebodies. Kind of sad really.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 19 Apr 2022, 23:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2895 Post Likes: +3603 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well, I don't know how to edit my original post, but maybe the topic should read: Best plane for 4 people, 600nm. It seems that 5-6 people is a tipping point that drives a massive step change in costs.
I think my original intent exceeds my finances. One option for us is simply to limit who travels GA. I can have junior staff fly commercial as necessary. If we cut this down to a 4-seater mission, with all else staying the same, does this simply become an SR-22 or DA-62 thread?
Vic Now you are squarely in Meridian territory, and if they are normal BMI types even Malibu/Mirage. SR 22 is a little on the smaller side for 4 people that may not be intimate with each other, and hard to climb above weather for business use where you may want dispatch reliability. Unless you can convince them to use the nose hoses. Same with the DA62. But 4 people 600 nm opens up more options. Need 200+ knots to keep travel time to a 3 hr. bladder time without a lav.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 20 Apr 2022, 06:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/31/14 Posts: 534 Post Likes: +255
Aircraft: eclipse
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Idk about post-covid, but F model mu2’s used to be similarly priced to 414/421
Fuel cost/nm also similar Well, 58 gph at 260 KTAS is about double what I’m using in the 414 at 200 KTAS. Yes, I could bump up fuel flow to 35 GPH to go a few knots faster, maybe 205? MU-2: 260 KTAS / 58 GPH = 4.5 NM per gal C414: 200 KTAS / 30 GPH = 6.7 NM per gal (50% improvement) MU-2: 1 / 4.5 = 0.22 gal per NM * $5 = $1.1 per NM C414: 1 / 6.7 = 0.15 gal per NM * $6 = $0.90 per NM *************** Cessna Citation Mustang: 330 KTAS / 75 GPH = 4.4 NM per gal 1 / 4.4 = 0.23 gal per NM * $5 = $1.14 per NM
An Eclipse was actually designed for this mission EA50 357 KTAS / 54 GPH = 6.7 NM per gal 1 / 6.7 = 0.15 gal per NM * $5 = $0.75 per NM
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|