banner
banner

25 Apr 2024, 11:44 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 14:45 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 8094
Post Likes: +5790
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
For a few years I flew my friend's borrowed 7AC to every fly-in breakfast, airport pot luck, and other social event I could find within about 75 miles of home base. I never failed to get positive comments from onlookers, and sometimes got marshalled to a featured spot. I think only Cub pilots find the Cub more exciting.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 15:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/07/10
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +512
Aircraft: Pitts S-2B
Username Protected wrote:
For a few years I flew my friend's borrowed 7AC to every fly-in breakfast, airport pot luck, and other social event I could find within about 75 miles of home base. I never failed to get positive comments from onlookers, and sometimes got marshalled to a featured spot. I think only Cub pilots find the Cub more exciting.


In the 65hp Cub I flew, 75 miles would be an overnight trip. I liked flying it but I'm not sure I would pay the premium that Cubs seem to command just to own one. I'd like to try a clipped wing Cub if ever I can get my hands on one.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 17:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/27/09
Posts: 981
Post Likes: +508
Location: Knoxville TN
Aircraft: C150J
I would fly one first. I did not like the way they handle. I flew one (as I recall a 7AC) with the smaller conti engine with no electrical system and rate of climb was very poor. Controls are heavy for a light airplane but it is also very stable. People always claim they are docile tail wheel airplanes but in my experience not always. In three point landings they are okay but wheel landings are hard to master and it will go sideways on you quickly with little warning. The Decathlon is much nicer flying airplane. All of them will be in poor condition and recovering them is expensive.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 18:31 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 30761
Post Likes: +10761
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
If you want full electric, you do not want a 7AC. Not enough useful load.

That's what I was thinking. Does the 115 HP mod include a GW increase?

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 18:55 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14154
Post Likes: +9100
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
I had a 160HP 7GCBC with flaps. Loved loved loved it. After 100 hrs or so I had it so dialed I could practically do a wheel landing all the way to the hangar. Super fun and docile tail dragger.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 20:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/11
Posts: 9168
Post Likes: +17163
Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
I learned to fly TW in a 65HP Champ when I was eleven. I still remember that first flight. I had been flying a 172 and when we came off the runway, I pitched the nose up to about where I would with the 172. I was flying with a "new" instructor, not my regular. He started hollering that I was trying to stall the airplane. Seems like he could have told me something about pitch before we left the ground. I learned to spin and recover in that Champ and flew it, on and off, until I was 25 years old. I ran into that instructor the other day. He is an OLD man now. We are still friends though. :peace:

I have owned a J-3 modified to a PA-11 with an O-200 for 28 years and don't know why. I bought it to teach my boys to fly and did. The Champ is a more pleasant airplane in every way and faster than a similarly powered Cub. Any of the more modern Citabria models are extremely easy to fly IMO. I have also owned a GCBC and two Decathlons.

If there weren't so many memories wrapped up in the Cub, I would probably sell it and buy a Champ. I'm starting lessons with my ten year old grandson this summer. There is nothing I want more in this life right now than for him to remember me as the guy that taught him to fly.

Jg :peace:

_________________
Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 21:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/23/19
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +818
Aircraft: Bonanza 35
People often say the teddy bear on the tail is why cubs go for a premium compared to champs. I’m not sure.

I think a cub is easier to maintain than a champ. There’s more cubs. Cub parts are really easy to get. The gear on a champ is more complicated. Wood spar ADs on the champ. Might be a spar ad for wood spar cubs, I don’t know. The later J3 cubs have metal spars. The cub trim mechanism can be a source of problems. If it doesn’t work good, it could be many things. Lots of places for it to bind.

The door on the cub is a great feature. Propping a cub is easier than a champ. With the cub, you can do it from behind the prop next to an open door. Easy to get to the primer and throttle. Flying the cub door open is excellent.

Capability wise, they might as well be the same. Champs are a little faster, not enough to make a difference. For me the only important thing is useful load.

Best feature for the champ is flying is from the front and good visibility over the nose. The cub is supposed to be flown from the back seat. The back seat is roomier and more comfortable anyway. Passengers like the front.

I’d be proud to own or fly a nice example of either of them.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 21:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/23/19
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +818
Aircraft: Bonanza 35
I’m not a champ guy but I think you can get a gw increase by converting a 7AC to a 7DC, gets you to 1320 lbs. Which is probably to best way to put more HP into it. Then you could use Bill Pancake’s STC to put in a C-90. It doesn’t get you to 115 hp and I’m not aware of how that could be done legally today. I also think you end up with about the same cruise speed and useful load after the conversion but you climb real good.

Username Protected wrote:
If you want full electric, you do not want a 7AC. Not enough useful load.

That's what I was thinking. Does the 115 HP mod include a GW increase?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering Aeronca Champ
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2022, 22:04 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 06/28/08
Posts: 1585
Post Likes: +174
Location: Indianapolis , IN (KMQJ)
Aircraft: 1962 Debonair B33
My 2 cents.

The Cub has much more harmonized controls.

The Champ is slightly easier to get into.

The Champ has massive adverse yaw and will teach you to lead with the rudder, and you will be flying it all the time.

I own a Cub, which I am having a harder time every year getting in to.

Consider a Chief (I’ve owned two), same as a Champ but side to side seating.

Much easier to get into than either a Cub or a Champ, and cheaper.

But what do I know.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.