18 Apr 2024, 07:15 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 09 Sep 2023, 11:59 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 4697 Post Likes: +2703
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
There is a tendency to focus on NASA management problems - which are very real but SLS is also a poor design. Its directly derived from the space shuttle, and some of the early heavy lift variants - a 50 year old design (major design frozen in 1972, flew in 81) that was itself a cost compromise from more capable launch vehicle concepts.
The shuttle was an OK design for the time - but there should have been a follow-on that fixed a lot of its issues. Instead NASA went though an endless series of new concepts / designs, that were then canceled.
This is not the fault of the engineers who I'm sure would love to design a modern launch vehicle, but of management that makes poor project technical decisions.
It will be interesting to see how SpaceX does. Falcon was an excellent design that represented a real advance in the cost performance of launch vehicles. I'm less sanguine about BFR / Starship. I get the sense that Musk is building it just so he can have the biggest rocket. I think a more farsighted approach would have been to work on in-orbit assembly, to allow large spacecraft to be constructed from easier to launch components.
Maybe BFR will be a success - we'll see.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 09:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +12469 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
The space program that scares/bothers/upsets me is Boeing. They are our only domestic producer of airliners and they can't build a functional spacecraft, not to mention the incredible misfires they have experienced with the 787 and Max programs. We need a dependable domestic producer of airliners to continue to be a world leader.
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 11:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Fortunately, its not my $$ at stake. Still, its entertaining. Actually, your $$$ are at stake when it comes to SpaceX success or failure. For example, the commercial crew program at SpaceX has saved substantial tax payer money over an internal NASA program or what Boeing is trying to do. The return to the moon depends heavily on SpaceX starship working and lowers the cost of doing so dramatically over anything NASA would do itself or other contractors. To say it another way, the failure or success of SpaceX has a significant and material impact on where tax dollars are spent, and the potential failure or success of NASA missions. To a large extent, the FAA is the major threat to NASA's timeline by keeping SpaceX from failing faster and iterating improvements in less time. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 21:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 19900 Post Likes: +19618 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm less sanguine about BFR / Starship. I get the sense that Musk is building it just so he can have the biggest rocket. No, Musk is building it to put Musk on Mars. The only reason that SpaceX exists is to accomplish that, everything else is ancillary to that goal.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 22:23 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 4697 Post Likes: +2703
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
Partly. He certainly wants to go to Mars. OTOH, I'm really not convinced a large launch vehicle is the best approach. Falcon 9 is very reliable and could launch a mars rocket in pieces. (He is already relying on lots of inflight refueling steps). BFR is distracting from the very large number of other technologies that need to be developed to do a mars mission Username Protected wrote: I'm less sanguine about BFR / Starship. I get the sense that Musk is building it just so he can have the biggest rocket. No, Musk is building it to put Musk on Mars. The only reason that SpaceX exists is to accomplish that, everything else is ancillary to that goal.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 22:32 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: BFR is distracting from the very large number of other technologies that need to be developed to do a mars mission BFR is required to achieve Mars colony. You need a rocket where 100% of it is reused and can be quickly reflown in a few days or even a few hours. Land the booster in the tower, land the second stage on the ground, winch it on top, refuel, and go. You need to reduce the cost of space by a factor of 10 or more and the BFR is that if successful. Also, you need a rocket where you can make the fuel from what you find on Mars. That is why it is methalox. CO2 provides the carbon and oxygen, only need to find the hydrogen. Colonizing Mars is stupid and irrational IMO, but the desire to do that is driving the cost of space down with the BFR. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 06:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +12469 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
Just like Sputnik, the Starship is not all about space. It will have the potential to deliver, or land, a large payload amywhere on EARTH within less than an hour.
Think about those implications for a minute.
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 10:28 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Musk has also stated that without BFR, Starlink cannot achieve profitability. Notice this is not the same as "with Starship, Starlink CAN achieve profitability". The military uses of Starlink and Starship have countries around the world concerned, including the USA. SpaceX has made itself a big factor in military planning. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: NASA: "At current cost levels the SLS pgm is unsustainab Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 11:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/02/14 Posts: 1997 Post Likes: +2007 Location: Lakeville, Minnesota (KLVN)
Aircraft: J35
|
|
Ask yourself why Boeing is in this situation. Probably have a long debate and come up with multiple contributing factors. We as a society no longer embrace failure. We fear it, we punish it, we regulate and regulate. Look at Elon and SpaceX, they are an outliner where it is still OK for things to explode. Yet when Starship did explode a few times, which was pretty much planned, people called it a failure. Wall Street measures shareholder value through stock price based on quarterly results. Hard to lead a company to a long term vision when the metrics are all about yesterday. The list goes on. Username Protected wrote: The space program that scares/bothers/upsets me is Boeing. They are our only domestic producer of airliners and they can't build a functional spacecraft, not to mention the incredible misfires they have experienced with the 787 and Max programs. We need a dependable domestic producer of airliners to continue to be a world leader.
_________________ N340Q J35
ASEL&MEL ASES CFII MEI BPPP Instructor
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|