28 Apr 2024, 18:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 27 Aug 2023, 13:07 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23623 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here you go None of those match the PWC compressor wash system schematic in my JT15D-5A manual: Attachment: pwc-compressor-wash-system.png 30 gallons of fluids, 3 pressure gauges, shop air connection, 2 filters, 7 valves, and some sort of electronic valve timer. Really? Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 28 Aug 2023, 18:34 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/31/13 Posts: 1235 Post Likes: +602 Company: Docking Drawer Location: KCCR
Aircraft: C425
|
|
I built a rinse cart which is just used for compressor and turbine rinses, not washes. I believe for salt mitigation you just need a distilled water rinse, not a wash. My kit was about $200 in parts plus a little time for assembly (not including the proprietary rinse nozzle from PWC for the PT6). I can do rinses by myself on a PT6 using a remote switch that I run through the storm window into the cockpit.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ ATP, CFI-I, MEI http://www.dockingdrawer.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 29 Aug 2023, 11:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 6708 Post Likes: +8044 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Every flight seems excessive, but considering the salt content in the air down there, I guess I could see it. As I recall, most of the engines I worked on had a schedule for wash, either being every 100 hours or so, or when turbine temps were trending higher at a set N1 (the rationale being a dirty compressor was aerodynamically less efficient requiring more work from the turbine to reach the desired fan speed). The only customer that utilized a more frequent wash schedule (approx every three days as I recall) was the US Coast Guard, which literally had planes sitting in saltwater at certain bases (like Miami). I’d be curious which engine manufacturer and model is recommending a daily wash. As an aside, back in the day we had a number of different methods for doing the wash routine. One apparatus was a wand that extended into the inlet (biz jet application), with a cuff conforming to the leading edge (and held down with sandbags). A concept we developed and tested (but never made into production) was a manifold built into the fan frame with a quick disconnect on the nacelle. Today, your biggest issue may be environmental restrictions which many airports have with running the wash fluid onto the tarmac. For this reason, Pratt devised their EcoWash system, which captures and recycles the wash solution. If you’ve got a million, you can probably persuade Pratt to part with one. Otherwise, you may need to find a local vendor who has a unit. Art
Whatever happened to throwing a bag of walnut shells into the inlet with the engine spooled up?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 29 Aug 2023, 18:32 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 6791 Post Likes: +7357 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As I recall, most of the engines I worked on had a schedule for wash, either being every 100 hours or so, or when turbine temps were trending higher at a set N1 (the rationale being a dirty compressor was aerodynamically less efficient requiring more work from the turbine to reach the desired fan speed).
The only customer that utilized a more frequent wash schedule (approx every three days as I recall) was the US Coast Guard, which literally had planes sitting in saltwater at certain bases (like Miami).
I’d be curious which engine manufacturer and model is recommending a daily wash.
As an aside, back in the day we had a number of different methods for doing the wash routine. One apparatus was a wand that extended into the inlet (biz jet application), with a cuff conforming to the leading edge (and held down with sandbags). A concept we developed and tested (but never made into production) was a manifold built into the fan frame with a quick disconnect on the nacelle.
Today, your biggest issue may be environmental restrictions which many airports have with running the wash fluid onto the tarmac. For this reason, Pratt devised their EcoWash system, which captures and recycles the wash solution. If you’ve got a million, you can probably persuade Pratt to part with one. Otherwise, you may need to find a local vendor who has a unit.
Art Whatever happened to throwing a bag of walnut shells into the inlet with the engine spooled up?
Better put that in green... someone might do it!
_________________ It’s a brave new world, one where most have forgotten the old ways.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 29 Aug 2023, 18:42 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 6791 Post Likes: +7357 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As I recall, most of the engines I worked on had a schedule for wash, either being every 100 hours or so, or when turbine temps were trending higher at a set N1 (the rationale being a dirty compressor was aerodynamically less efficient requiring more work from the turbine to reach the desired fan speed).
The only customer that utilized a more frequent wash schedule (approx every three days as I recall) was the US Coast Guard, which literally had planes sitting in saltwater at certain bases (like Miami).
I’d be curious which engine manufacturer and model is recommending a daily wash.
As an aside, back in the day we had a number of different methods for doing the wash routine. One apparatus was a wand that extended into the inlet (biz jet application), with a cuff conforming to the leading edge (and held down with sandbags). A concept we developed and tested (but never made into production) was a manifold built into the fan frame with a quick disconnect on the nacelle.
Today, your biggest issue may be environmental restrictions which many airports have with running the wash fluid onto the tarmac. For this reason, Pratt devised their EcoWash system, which captures and recycles the wash solution. If you’ve got a million, you can probably persuade Pratt to part with one. Otherwise, you may need to find a local vendor who has a unit.
Art Whatever happened to throwing a bag of walnut shells into the inlet with the engine spooled up?
Better put that in green... someone might do it!
_________________ It’s a brave new world, one where most have forgotten the old ways.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 29 Aug 2023, 19:58 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/21/21 Posts: 185 Post Likes: +161
Aircraft: Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Whatever happened to throwing a bag of walnut shells into the inlet with the engine spooled up? Better put that in green... someone might do it! I worked with an old fellow, started flying the the 1930’s, worked for Convair in San Diego. I remember him telling me that’s how they did it back the day, though my recollection is that they were ground walnut shells.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 29 Aug 2023, 23:28 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23623 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Whatever happened to throwing a bag of walnut shells into the inlet with the engine spooled up? ;) Better put that in green... someone might do it! :doh: Using ground up walnut shells to clean jet engines is a known process that was used in the past and still is approved for some engines (typically airline types).
The walnut shells are inexpensive, and have the right softness to not damage the metal but the right hardness to knock off buildups.
I haven't seen anything that suggests it is approved for PT6 or JT15D, however, but it is a valid idea.
Filtered and ground walnut shells are sold and still used to clean things like steam turbines.
Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 30 Aug 2023, 11:34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 8804 Post Likes: +13592 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was more concerned about the person throwing the shells into the engine, than the engine itself. Just make sure they aren't wearing anything metal. No belt buckles, keys or phones in pockets, etc. and the engine should be fine.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Sep 2023, 10:08 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 6791 Post Likes: +7357 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Same here, in the process of closing three airplanes and telling myself that we might not get a 4th quarter rush, that I might get a break, then I have two existing clients looking to upgrade and three new prospects... just this week. The 4th quarter of last year was nuts, looking like this one will be the same.
To Corey's point, the 525 market has dried right up, we were able to acquire a nice CJ2+ and a nice CJ3 earlier this year, in fact with an increase in inventory, I was worried we might have overpaid for the CJ3... Nope. Those markets went right back to extremely tight.
We're currently shopping for a CJ2+ and CJ3... very few to choose from, we also have an M2 client, he's lucky and gets to pick what he wants, several nice airplanes on the market and many more off market.
_________________ It’s a brave new world, one where most have forgotten the old ways.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|