banner
banner

28 Apr 2024, 13:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:07 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4006
Post Likes: +4413
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks for resurrecting this thread. It's been fun to revisit.

Jon, did they lop the refueling probe off? Is that what the pipe with an angled end is on the starboard side of the nose?

I'd have kept it. It would make a good place to hang my towel after showering at OSH and a jungle gym for unattended kids.

Looks like the minigun. Refueling probe was on the port side.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:29 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 688
Post Likes: +352
Company: Cessna (retired)
Another saying from my Air Force days a long time ago:

There were fast movers (F-4's, F-105's and other jet fighters.)

There were slow movers (O-1's, O-2's, helicopters, etc.)

The ones in between (A-37's, OV-10's, A-10's later) were half-fast movers (say it quick).


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:30 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 8100
Post Likes: +5795
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
Aha. That makes more sense.

I found a couple of other pics that show the probe was actually mounted on the centerline. I didn’t notice until just now that the plumbing was on the surface.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/23/11
Posts: 3191
Post Likes: +2490
Aircraft: 210
Previous photo rotated


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Inasmuch as which....ever so much more so.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 00:47 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 688
Post Likes: +352
Company: Cessna (retired)
Username Protected wrote:
Aha. That makes more sense.

I found a couple of other pics that show the probe was actually mounted on the centerline. I didn’t notice until just now that the plumbing was on the surface.


Maybe there was more than one configuration. ISTR fuel lines from the probe running back external to the fuselage below the left cockpit sill.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 08:22 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13150
Post Likes: +19216
Company: Keybilly Adventures
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired.

_________________
“Fear is the Mind-Killer”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/26/15
Posts: 9548
Post Likes: +8782
Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320)
Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
Username Protected wrote:
It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired.

Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty.

I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours.

That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that.


And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:59 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13150
Post Likes: +19216
Company: Keybilly Adventures
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired.

Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty.

I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours.

That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that.


And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.


I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s.
_________________
“Fear is the Mind-Killer”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/03/15
Posts: 108
Post Likes: +113
Aircraft: King Air
Since 87921 was a South Vietnamese aircraft, it was not delivered with an air fueling probe.

As for the 7.62 gun, it held 1,500 rounds and could fire at a rate of 3,000 rounds per minute. I'm told it wasn't that effective, and was used primarily for strafing troops in the open.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/26/15
Posts: 9548
Post Likes: +8782
Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320)
Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
Username Protected wrote:
I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s.

I hear ya. It’s a stark difference from the postwar era and how easily you could buy surplus airplanes back then. The vast majority of owners have done a really great job managing the issues that come part-and-parcel with maintaining that living history- and I’m thrilled to see these latest pics of Huggy’s piece of living history.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 688
Post Likes: +352
Company: Cessna (retired)
Username Protected wrote:
It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired.

Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty.

I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours.

That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that.


And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.


I think the T-37's were pretty worn out structurally.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/25/20
Posts: 55
Post Likes: +27
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
Username Protected wrote:

Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty.

I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours.

That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that.


And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.[/quote]

I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s.[/quote]

I’m pretty sure the Tweets were still structurally sound (I don’t have any special knowledge so I could be wrong). They are massively overbuilt. You could land it gear up in the morning and maintenance would have it flying that afternoon. The T6 is so solidly built that the USAF is already referring to it as worn out. I wouldn’t expect DOD to make any future retired military aircraft available as surplus.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:41 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13150
Post Likes: +19216
Company: Keybilly Adventures
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
I wouldn’t expect DOD to make any future retired military aircraft available as surplus.


The DOD will do what Congress tells them to do, and I think AOPA should work on a bill that requires military trainers to be made available to the public for purchase after their retirement. There is no reason we cannot keep these airplanes flying the same way we have with the warbirds of yesteryear.

_________________
“Fear is the Mind-Killer”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 16 Sep 2023, 14:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/28/11
Posts: 1731
Post Likes: +1737
Company: N/A - Retired
Location: Southern AZ / South Carolina
Username Protected wrote:
Since 87921 was a South Vietnamese aircraft, it was not delivered with an air fueling probe.

As for the 7.62 gun, it held 1,500 rounds and could fire at a rate of 3,000 rounds per minute. I'm told it wasn't that effective, and was used primarily for strafing troops in the open.


Sure was fun to shoot, though!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet
PostPosted: 15 Feb 2024, 03:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/03/15
Posts: 108
Post Likes: +113
Aircraft: King Air
It's been a few months, but we took 87921 to Madison, WI for the 115th Fighter Wing's anniversary celebration and to celebrate their acquisition of the F-35.

They wanted aircraft from their unit's past... and we were happy to oblige.

Three hops to get there, and three hops to St George UT to store it for the winter. The jet flew flawlessly. Charlie Largay's restoration of this rare American warbird is really an exceptional story... both the history of the jet and his hard work to get it flying.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Marsh.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.