28 Apr 2024, 13:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4006 Post Likes: +4413 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks for resurrecting this thread. It's been fun to revisit.
Jon, did they lop the refueling probe off? Is that what the pipe with an angled end is on the starboard side of the nose?
I'd have kept it. It would make a good place to hang my towel after showering at OSH and a jungle gym for unattended kids. Looks like the minigun. Refueling probe was on the port side.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Be Nice
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 15 Sep 2023, 21:29 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 688 Post Likes: +352 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Another saying from my Air Force days a long time ago:
There were fast movers (F-4's, F-105's and other jet fighters.)
There were slow movers (O-1's, O-2's, helicopters, etc.)
The ones in between (A-37's, OV-10's, A-10's later) were half-fast movers (say it quick).
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 00:47 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 688 Post Likes: +352 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Aha. That makes more sense.
I found a couple of other pics that show the probe was actually mounted on the centerline. I didn’t notice until just now that the plumbing was on the surface. Maybe there was more than one configuration. ISTR fuel lines from the probe running back external to the fuselage below the left cockpit sill.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/26/15 Posts: 9548 Post Likes: +8782 Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320) Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired. Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty. I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours. That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that. And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 10:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/25/10 Posts: 13150 Post Likes: +19216 Company: Keybilly Adventures Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired. Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty. I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours. That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that. And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.
I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s.
_________________ “Fear is the Mind-Killer”
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:11 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 108 Post Likes: +113
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Since 87921 was a South Vietnamese aircraft, it was not delivered with an air fueling probe.
As for the 7.62 gun, it held 1,500 rounds and could fire at a rate of 3,000 rounds per minute. I'm told it wasn't that effective, and was used primarily for strafing troops in the open.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 11:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/26/15 Posts: 9548 Post Likes: +8782 Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320) Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s. I hear ya. It’s a stark difference from the postwar era and how easily you could buy surplus airplanes back then. The vast majority of owners have done a really great job managing the issues that come part-and-parcel with maintaining that living history- and I’m thrilled to see these latest pics of Huggy’s piece of living history.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:18 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 688 Post Likes: +352 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's absolutely criminal that the DOD did not make the T37s (and the T34s) available on the civilian market when they were retired. Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty. I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours. That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that. And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.
I think the T-37's were pretty worn out structurally.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:35 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/25/20 Posts: 55 Post Likes: +27
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Some of those old T-34Cs had OCF recovery issues. Years of being used as primary trainers (more like dog years) and it was hard to get them rigged straight. So there was some liability there (liability in the broad sense, not the “sue the government” sense). You and I are both retired so neither of us has access to the naval air safety archives, suffice to say it wasn’t pretty. I can’t see the beloved Tweet fleet being much different in this way- similar vintage, mission, hours. That said, I am certain that there is a certain kind of buyer out there who would provide those kinds of airframes the TLC they need to fly well. 99% of the warbird community and their accomplishments is clear evidence to that. And all that said, I would still LOVE to see either of those airplanes roll up to an FBO and crack the canopy.[/quote] I can't imagine that the liability would be much greater than warplanes that had bullet-holes. Obviously, I think they should be held to appropriate airworthiness standards, but I hope that, in 30 years, we make a better decision with the T-6s.[/quote] I’m pretty sure the Tweets were still structurally sound (I don’t have any special knowledge so I could be wrong). They are massively overbuilt. You could land it gear up in the morning and maintenance would have it flying that afternoon. The T6 is so solidly built that the USAF is already referring to it as worn out. I wouldn’t expect DOD to make any future retired military aircraft available as surplus.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 13:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/25/10 Posts: 13150 Post Likes: +19216 Company: Keybilly Adventures Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wouldn’t expect DOD to make any future retired military aircraft available as surplus. The DOD will do what Congress tells them to do, and I think AOPA should work on a bill that requires military trainers to be made available to the public for purchase after their retirement. There is no reason we cannot keep these airplanes flying the same way we have with the warbirds of yesteryear.
_________________ “Fear is the Mind-Killer”
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 16 Sep 2023, 14:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/28/11 Posts: 1731 Post Likes: +1737 Company: N/A - Retired Location: Southern AZ / South Carolina
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Since 87921 was a South Vietnamese aircraft, it was not delivered with an air fueling probe.
As for the 7.62 gun, it held 1,500 rounds and could fire at a rate of 3,000 rounds per minute. I'm told it wasn't that effective, and was used primarily for strafing troops in the open. Sure was fun to shoot, though!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Super Tweet Posted: 15 Feb 2024, 03:12 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 108 Post Likes: +113
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
It's been a few months, but we took 87921 to Madison, WI for the 115th Fighter Wing's anniversary celebration and to celebrate their acquisition of the F-35.
They wanted aircraft from their unit's past... and we were happy to oblige.
Three hops to get there, and three hops to St George UT to store it for the winter. The jet flew flawlessly. Charlie Largay's restoration of this rare American warbird is really an exceptional story... both the history of the jet and his hard work to get it flying.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|