21 May 2025, 22:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 25 Jul 2020, 12:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/10/12 Posts: 328 Post Likes: +263 Location: KTKV KBKV
Aircraft: C23
|
|
Helping a couple with their 210M with VGs. What’s a good speed on an approach and then over the numbers with flaps 20? Pulling power in the flare or prior to the flare?
Thanks.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 26 Jul 2020, 00:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/12 Posts: 670 Post Likes: +261
|
|
80-90 kts with flaps 20
60 over the numbers with full flaps.
Its a heavy yoke, so a little power helps in the flare.
Hope this helps.
Rgs Patrick
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 26 Jul 2020, 10:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/10/12 Posts: 328 Post Likes: +263 Location: KTKV KBKV
Aircraft: C23
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 80-90 kts with flaps 20
60 over the numbers with full flaps.
Its a heavy yoke, so a little power helps in the flare.
Hope this helps.
Rgs Patrick Thanks Patrick. I appreciate it. Kirk
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 26 Jul 2020, 13:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/24/14 Posts: 1896 Post Likes: +2603
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 80-90 kts with flaps 20
60 over the numbers with full flaps.
Its a heavy yoke, so a little power helps in the flare.
Hope this helps.
Rgs Patrick Thanks Patrick. I appreciate it. Kirk It's been 20 years since I added VGs to a T210M I owned, so I don't remember the airspeeds before or after VGs. What I do vividly remember is the improvement of control authority after they were added.
Before I added them, I felt like the plane handled sluggishly at slow speeds, especially on final. I felt like it was just barely hanging in the air.
After the VGs were installed, low speed control authority was much better and I felt much more positive control on final.
_________________ Jay
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 17:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/12/17 Posts: 387 Post Likes: +154
|
|
I have a Cessna 210L and have thought about VGs, but not pulled the trigger. I have thought about buying them, putting speed tape on my wings and attaching them to the speed tape and performing low speed maneuvers to see how they feel.
If i can get a 5-10% reduction in stall speed with a 5% or less top end penalty I am all in.
Is doing what i suggest - temp install with speed tape a valid testing option?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 17:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14276 Post Likes: +16205 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Go do stalls and note the indicated airspeed. Then fly the approach at 1.3X that speed.
Each plane is different, and every pilot should be doing stalls regularly for skill retention as well as to know the approach speeds. Dan Grider and the Aviation 101 folks are now pushing for 1.404x
_________________ Holoholo …
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 19:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/03/08 Posts: 3850 Post Likes: +1559 Location: HPN/NY
Aircraft: T210M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Go do stalls and note the indicated airspeed. Then fly the approach at 1.3X that speed.
Each plane is different, and every pilot should be doing stalls regularly for skill retention as well as to know the approach speeds. Dan Grider and the Aviation 101 folks are now pushing for 1.404x
Hi Doug -- So Gryder is saying to fly at 1.404Vso on short final? Or is he saying something else about a minimum maneuvering speed?
_________________ http://www.scottdyercfi.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 12:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9294 Post Likes: +15874 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Go do stalls and note the indicated airspeed. Then fly the approach at 1.3X that speed.
Each plane is different, and every pilot should be doing stalls regularly for skill retention as well as to know the approach speeds. Dan Grider and the Aviation 101 folks are now pushing for 1.404x
Dan is using that as a minimum maneuvering speed in the pattern NOT a minimum speed on short final or over the fence speed. It seems reasonable to slow up after making your base to final turn and once lined up with the runway as your risk factors have changed.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210M with VGs Approach Speed Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 16:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9294 Post Likes: +15874 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Who's Dan Grider? An alternate version of Dan Gryder. Dan Gryder is a flight instructor and retired airline captain who wants to bring some safety concepts from the airline world to the GA world through improved instruction and especially more relevant biannual flight reviews. He partners with a number of popular you tubers to spread his message. He often points out that there are a handful of things GA pilots keep doing over and over to kill themselves. One of them is obviously stall/spin while maneuvering near the ground. He came up with a minimum maneuvering speed of 1.404 Vso which I think is overly specific* but I think the general idea has merit and is similar to age old methods like “100 down wind, 90 base, 80 final” except simpler and easier to apply to different aircraft. Something like “Above 1.4 Vso in the pattern, slowing to 1.3 Vso once lined up on final” should provide a sufficient safety margin (and a slower final with less float) on a fairly wide range of GA aircraft. *if you are good enough hold the airspeed between 1.403 and 1.405 Vso, you are not likely in need of Dan’s help. If 1.404 provides sufficient safety margin but 1.400 doesn’t, you have other issues.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|