banner
banner

23 Apr 2024, 05:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 07:38 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4966
Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380.

Not my plane and I’m not flying


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Last edited on 20 Jun 2020, 16:06, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 12:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2252
Post Likes: +2215
Location: Queretaro / Woodlands
Aircraft: C525 BE40 D1K Waco
Username Protected wrote:
Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380.

Yeah - that's toasty - pretty close to the ITT temp limits for continuous operations especially on the right side. Where did you get the N1 setting from? 102.8 N1 seems quite high. Furthermore, I normally fly by the ITT's anyway and keep them no higher than 750 - I like to take care of my engines even if they're on TAP. At that altitude (don't know what the ISA was), the N1 setting should be somewhere between 99-100.

Did you look over the AFM? BTW, need to check your standby alt setting... can't perform your RVSM checks like that.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 15:46 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4966
Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Thanks Alex. This was from a friend who flew the plane. What’s the max fan speed at FL380 and -42?


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 16:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2252
Post Likes: +2215
Location: Queretaro / Woodlands
Aircraft: C525 BE40 D1K Waco
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks Alex. This was from a friend who flew the plane. What’s the max fan speed at FL380 and -42?

He needs an N1 computer. I’d have to go look to calculate it manually. I am spoiled because I have the G1000 which calculates it automatically but I know it’s not 102.8 with those conditions. He was probably ISA +12. He is going to burn those engines. In absence of an N1 computer, tell him to keep the ITT below 750.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 17:44 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1562
Post Likes: +1781
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
The TAS differ between the GTNs by 8kts? Seems strange.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 17:50 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4966
Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
The TAS differ between the GTNs by 8kts? Seems strange.


Second garmin got sent out. It didn’t work


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 20 Jun 2020, 18:03 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 8460
Post Likes: +3707
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
The TAS differ between the GTNs by 8kts? Seems strange.


Second garmin got sent out. It didn’t work


The TAS comes from the sensors. I hope it didn't get sent out for that alone

Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2020, 04:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 911
Post Likes: +449
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: CE525,PA31
Username Protected wrote:
Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380.


With RAT-42 at FL380 we are talking ISA. The recommended N1 is 101. As Alex notes most of the recommended settings will yield a TIT of 750.

You are correct the max N1 is 104.4, but that number is not recommended in any of the data from Cessna.

The numbers is that picture is all within limits so Williams I would imagine would not be concerned.

Those numbers are high compared to my CJ and the others that aI fly. The N2 is higher for #2 as well by .6. Descent split. I’d say motor 2 is a little worn.

Do you have the hours on the motors?

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2020, 07:10 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4966
Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
Can any of you guys with CJ experience please comment if these are high by Williams standards? Aren't these 104 N1 engines too? This picture was taken at 380.


With RAT-42 at FL380 we are talking ISA. The recommended N1 is 101. As Alex notes most of the recommended settings will yield a TIT of 750.

You are correct the max N1 is 104.4, but that number is not recommended in any of the data from Cessna.

The numbers is that picture is all within limits so Williams I would imagine would not be concerned.

Those numbers are high compared to my CJ and the others that aI fly. The N2 is higher for #2 as well by .6. Descent split. I’d say motor 2 is a little worn.

Do you have the hours on the motors?

Andrew


Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK.

Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2020, 18:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2252
Post Likes: +2215
Location: Queretaro / Woodlands
Aircraft: C525 BE40 D1K Waco
Username Protected wrote:
Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK.

Why wouldn’t you have confidence on Engine 2 if the borescope came back ok? 3300 hours is fairly low time on a turbine. Just tell your friend not to burn up the engine by flying it right up to the limits.

I don’t see why you wouldn't be able to run it on FLEX another 750 hours. Williams is a racket anyway - by pencil whipping a change from Elite to Blue (i.e. more money on Williams’ pocket) you go from 3500 hours to 5000 hours per their program. No technical justification - just BS paperwork. These are not pistons.

BTW - I’m a bit surprised your friend is asking these fairly basic questions. Where was he typed? Is he a 525 newbie? He may consider joining CJP.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2020, 21:21 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4966
Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK.

Why wouldn’t you have confidence on Engine 2 if the borescope came back ok? 3300 hours is fairly low time on a turbine. Just tell your friend not to burn up the engine by flying it right up to the limits.

I don’t see why you wouldn't be able to run it on FLEX another 750 hours. Williams is a racket anyway - by pencil whipping a change from Elite to Blue (i.e. more money on Williams’ pocket) you go from 3500 hours to 5000 hours per their program. No technical justification - just BS paperwork. These are not pistons.

BTW - I’m a bit surprised your friend is asking these fairly basic questions. Where was he typed? Is he a 525 newbie? He may consider joining CJP.


I don't think Mark Huffstutler is a 525 newbie. He was the one flying the airplane. I'm looking at buying it. Maybe he was just trying to make a point and test the engines. He approved them for FLEX after his boroscope and flight. I wasn't in the airplane otherwise I would have taken some videos. My Premier 1A friend was in the right seat.

Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 21 Jun 2020, 21:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/11/11
Posts: 2252
Post Likes: +2215
Location: Queretaro / Woodlands
Aircraft: C525 BE40 D1K Waco
No, Mark is definitely not a 525 newbie. I would put the engines on FLEX If he recommends it. He knows these airplanes inside and out.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ High ITTs?
PostPosted: 22 Jun 2020, 03:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 911
Post Likes: +449
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: CE525,PA31
Username Protected wrote:
[Yes, both motors are at 3300 first run off program. They had hots at 1,500 hours so basically they due for hots. I can put them on FLEX and run them another 750 but I don't have a ton of confidence all is OK inside motor #2 even though the boroscope checked out OK.


Im not over concerned at the high ITTs. I think there is a fair margin of them. A mate in a CJ2 had issues but it manifested in abnormally high ITTs on takeoff. Any idea how they performed on TO?

Williams seems to be pretty bulletproof.... Which is lucky as they are the jet Mafia.

Andrew


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.Marsh.jpg.