banner
banner

29 Nov 2025, 15:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 09:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/10/10
Posts: 1090
Post Likes: +811
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Aircraft: PC-12
Seriously, why don't they put wheelpants on the SkyCourier and Caravan? Even if they only pick up a couple of knots, multiply that times the fleet size and hours flown and it's a significant chunk of savings. Yes, I know the forklift guy might hit them but I think it's still worth the effort. Does a wheelpant STC for Caravans exist? If not, I think there's a void there.

_________________
----Still emotionally attached to my Baron----


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 09:23 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10286
Post Likes: +7358
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Guesses:
Easier preflight
Ramp rash
Weight vs speed benefit (they would not be small wheel pants!)

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 09:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/18
Posts: 2581
Post Likes: +2325
Location: NH
Aircraft: F33A, 757/767
With their stage lengths, there won't be very much time savings. Also makes maintenance more challenging. Probably would take twice as long to change a tire with wheel pants than without. Line guy is a little too eager with the chocks, probably just bounce off the tire. If there are wheel pants, it will probably damage the pant, and now you have a maintenance issue.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 10:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/08/13
Posts: 959
Post Likes: +267
Location: Lander, WY
Aircraft: Duke B60
And less problems if operated in snow or slush.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 12:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/08
Posts: 3110
Post Likes: +1067
Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory
Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
Same reason that most flight school aircraft have the wheel pants removed. Easily damaged, more difficult to service/inspect the wheels and brakes.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 16:04 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/26/13
Posts: 21931
Post Likes: +22597
Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
Username Protected wrote:
Same reason that most flight school aircraft have the wheel pants removed. Easily damaged, more difficult to service/inspect the wheels and brakes.

... and they're renting it out by the hour.

For rentals and schools there is zero incentive to put pants on the plane and multiple reasons to take them off, both practically and financially. I worked for a flight school/FBO that had a pile of them up in the loft of an old hangar collecting dust. They'd take them off when they bought a plane, and toss them up there never to be seen again.

_________________
My last name rhymes with 'geese'.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 17:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/10/10
Posts: 1090
Post Likes: +811
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Aircraft: PC-12
Surely with as many Caravans as are flying, some of them have stage lengths long enough for operators to find benefit. What about all the owner-pilots or passenger shuttles? I get that the freight dogs don't want them.

If they were shaped correctly, wheelpants could seriously save some money. See this video copied from another thread:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftq8jTQ ... ata_player

_________________
----Still emotionally attached to my Baron----


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 18:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/26/15
Posts: 10041
Post Likes: +10039
Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320)
Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
We might be overlooking the obvious... It's the year 2020. During Quarantine, pants aren't required.

:D :duck:


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 19:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/01/14
Posts: 9760
Post Likes: +16699
Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
Username Protected wrote:
Surely with as many Caravans as are flying, some of them have stage lengths long enough for operators to find benefit. What about all the owner-pilots or passenger shuttles? I get that the freight dogs don't want them.

If they were shaped correctly, wheelpants could seriously save some money. See this video copied from another thread:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftq8jTQ ... ata_player


If you are regularly using a caravan for a mission where wheel pants make sense, you probably bought the wrong plane.

_________________
Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar.
Flight suits = superior knowledge


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 19:53 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13186
Post Likes: +21109
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
The bales may knock them off over the drop zone?

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 18 May 2020, 21:49 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 9431
Post Likes: +7108
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
USAF thinks it can save $7million a year just by changing the resting angle of the windshield wipers on the KC-135.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/milita ... ld-wipers/

How many SkyCouriers is FedEx buying?


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 19 May 2020, 08:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 14721
Post Likes: +16855
Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
Username Protected wrote:
How many SkyCouriers is FedEx buying?

Their launch order is for 50 SkyCouriers.

Fedex & Cessna are mighty savvy. If there was a business case for wheel pants on the 208 and 408, they would have wheel pants.

_________________
Holoholo …


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 19 May 2020, 10:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/26/15
Posts: 10041
Post Likes: +10039
Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320)
Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
I am a little surprised that removable ones aren't more popular. I understand the math behind flight time and block time, but fuel savings are fuel savings...

The real answer is as you pointed out, Doug, if the customer doesn't want it then that's that.


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 19 May 2020, 10:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/17
Posts: 1245
Post Likes: +831
Location: CA
Aircraft: V35, C150
Fast forward you about 40 seconds. Looks like they’re available on a Kodiak.

https://youtu.be/qlpZ9gt4Cbw


Top

 Post subject: Re: SkyCourier and Caravan: Why No Wheelpants?
PostPosted: 19 May 2020, 12:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/01/11
Posts: 2520
Post Likes: +1516
Aircraft: F8L Falco
Maintenance and preflight.

George

_________________
Amateurs train until they get it right. Professionals train until they don't get it wrong


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.v2x.85x100.png.
.sarasota.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.