14 Jun 2025, 11:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX Starship Launch  Posted: 28 May 2025, 12:35 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 11/03/08
Posts: 16281
Post Likes: +27343
Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Now if only it wasn’t leaking and spinning out of control.  SpaceX is uncharacteristically struggling these days. Curiously it appears to be a string of unrelated failures. Baby steps I guess.  It's a new thing. new things take time. Go back to the early days of spave-c, they had a string of failures and nearly went under before having a successful test launch. Fast forward to learning how to land and re-use the falcon 9 boosters, same thing, before eventually becoming the most reliable booster design ever flown. This too will pass.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX Starship Launch Posted: 28 May 2025, 13:00 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 34954
Post Likes: +13475
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Now if only it wasn’t leaking and spinning out of control. SpaceX is uncharacteristically struggling these days. Curiously it appears to be a string of unrelated failures. Baby steps I guess. It's a new thing. new things take time. Go back to the early days of spave-c, they had a string of failures and nearly went under before having a successful test launch. Fast forward to learning how to land and re-use the falcon 9 boosters, same thing, before eventually becoming the most reliable booster design ever flown. This too will pass.
According to a documentary I read on the early days of Space-X, if they didn't have a successful launch on the first attempt that actually worked they would have gone belly up and probably quit trying. At least now it appears Musk can afford the failures, although I'm thinking he's running out of time to meet NASA's goals for a Moon landing.
_________________
-lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX Starship Launch Posted: 28 May 2025, 13:57 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 09/07/15
Posts: 144
Post Likes: +113
Aircraft: Bonanza N35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's a new thing. new things take time.
Go back to the early days of spave-c, they had a string of failures and nearly went under before having a successful test launch. Fast forward to learning how to land and re-use the falcon 9 boosters, same thing, before eventually becoming the most reliable booster design ever flown.
This too will pass. According to a documentary I read on the early days of Space-X, if they didn't have a successful launch on the first attempt that actually worked they would have gone belly up and probably quit trying. At least now it appears Musk can afford the failures, although I'm thinking he's running out of time to meet NASA's goals for a Moon landing.
I think SpaceX, even if late, will be ready before most of the other parts, like the Lunar Gateway. I wouldn't be surprised if they even do an unmanned landing entirely on their own.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX Starship Launch Posted: 28 May 2025, 14:15 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20327
Post Likes: +25478
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: According to a documentary I read on the early days of Space-X, if they didn't have a successful launch on the first attempt that actually worked they would have gone belly up and probably quit trying. Falcon 1 failed on the first 3 launches. If the 4th launch had not worked, it likely would have been the end of SpaceX. That was Sep 28, 2008, and unlike the previous 3 launches, no customer wanted to be a payload so they sent a dummy payload. The 5th (and final) launch of Falcon 1 worked and was the only one to carry a commercial payload. The Falcon 1 4th and 5th flight second stages are still in orbit. Today, SpaceX saves enough fuel to deorbit the Falcon 9 second stages. Mike C.
_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: SpaceX Starship Launch Posted: 28 May 2025, 17:03 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 03/30/11
Posts: 4169
Post Likes: +2946
Location: Greenwood, MO
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Caused by a fuel leak on a re-used booster. Multiple use hasn't been much in vogue since STS. May I introduce the Falcon 9? 479 missions with 404 re-flights. It looks like about 60% of all rocket launches in 2024 (worldwide) involved boosters that had flown before. https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/falcon-9/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
