13 Nov 2025, 15:56 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Electric Beaver Posted: 01 Nov 2019, 11:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/14 Posts: 540 Post Likes: +261
Aircraft: Cessna T206H
|
|
|
Wow that’s cool!
Love seeing stuff like this get developed. Kudos to Harbor Air
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Electric Beaver Posted: 01 Nov 2019, 22:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Or a very long extension cord. Username Protected wrote: They must have a very unique mission profile for that aircraft (very short flights in relatively warm weather) if they expect an electric floatplane of that size to have any functionality. It seems that the energy density available in batteries simply doesn’t cut it for true electric working planes. Perhaps some type of hybrid electric with an efficient diesel generator? For small training planes that stay pretty close to the airport, it seems electric is a great way to go. As an aside, it always bothers me when folks discuss electric motors as “emission free.” They never consider the electricity generation required. It’s got to come from somewhere and solar/wind doesn’t usually suffice. I use wind turbines at my home and they work great, but there are plenty of times the wind doesn’t blow and then the electricity comes from coal (most of it, actually).
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Electric Beaver Posted: 01 Nov 2019, 23:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/22/11 Posts: 1250 Post Likes: +716 Company: LOCO Aviation, LLC Location: KMRH Beaufort, NC
Aircraft: BE20, BE58, C310R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Clicked on the thread link expecting something different. Carry on......... Me and thee!
_________________ “Jet Elite” Thanks MH!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Electric Beaver Posted: 04 Nov 2019, 13:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/21/12 Posts: 1660 Post Likes: +527 Location: SW USA
Aircraft: Lowly renter
|
|
Quote: The test flight will serve as a proof-of-concept as the weight of the batteries will result in such a reduced payload that it wouldn’t be commercially viable. However, continued battery development is expected to bring down the power-to-weight ratio to a commercially sustainable level. Cool science experiment, but battery tech doesn't advance that quickly. I think it'll be a proof-of-concept for quite some time. At least it'll be cheap to operate!
_________________ Signature intentionally left blank. Do not read this.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|