18 Apr 2024, 07:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 10:56 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/14/19 Posts: 8 Company: Blue Horseshoe, LLC Location: Nashville, TN
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
I am a newer pilot that is looking to upgrade to a 6-pax after I finish my IFR certification. I have read many of the previous posts on this topic (and realize I am in biased company on this forum), and the common consensus is that the A36 is better built, and handles better - a "pilots plane".
I currently own and fly a Beech Sierra, and also have experience in a Piper Arrow. In the 4-pax category, I am very happy with my decision, as the Sierra is roomier, has pilot, passenger and baggage doors, and has big solid trailing link landing gear. Flight wise, I didn't distinguish a whole lot of difference between Piper and Beech, other than the Piper feels a little easier to land.
In looking to upgrade for speed, passengers and useful load, both the A36 and Saratoga will fit my mission. I'm partial to the A36 for speed, looks, and build quality, but the Saratoga has better useful load, is roomier, and for similar price can get newer plane or better equipped avionics wise. Having no experience in either, I'm trying to understand what people mean by "better handling" on the Beech vs Piper? By contrast, I've read the Saratoga "feels" more stable in IFR weather. Can anyone with experience in both types help me understand this handling issue, and what I would be giving up in upgrading to the Piper? Thank you!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 11:06 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/07/12 Posts: 536 Post Likes: +891 Location: Addison, TX
|
|
My passengers always commented about the roominess of the Saratoga.
I never had any of them say something about the A36.
As the pilot, I always preferred the A36.
You're the pilot. It's your money.
Buy the bonanza.
The passengers won't know what they're missing.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 11:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 6826 Post Likes: +7937 Company: Minister of Pith Location: Florida
Aircraft: Piper PA28/140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Marty, I've never flown a Saratoga, but I have flown a bit in a similar size Cherokee 6. I went through the exact same analysis a few years ago and I chose the A36, mainly for speed, but also resale.
I don't think you can go wrong with a Saratoga, if you can accept the speed penalty (talking normally aspirated here). The cabin is bigger, with bag storage in the cabin and also behind the engine. How much speed are we talking about here, and what's the reliability Conti vs Lycoming?
_________________ "No comment until the time limit is up."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 11:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/13/14 Posts: 8340 Post Likes: +6550 Location: Central Texas (KTPL)
Aircraft: PA-46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Marty, I've never flown a Saratoga, but I have flown a bit in a similar size Cherokee 6. I went through the exact same analysis a few years ago and I chose the A36, mainly for speed, but also resale.
I don't think you can go wrong with a Saratoga, if you can accept the speed penalty (talking normally aspirated here). The cabin is bigger, with bag storage in the cabin and also behind the engine. How much speed are we talking about here, and what's the reliability Conti vs Lycoming? Not totally sure as it largely depends on the individual ships being compared, but I estimated while shopping that the Saratoga would be 12-15 knots slower. Yes, over an X mile trip that's only minutes, but I wanted speed.
I bet the Lyc is more reliable, but I love the IO-550.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 11:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/27/12 Posts: 239 Post Likes: +65 Location: KGAI
Aircraft: Twin Comanche
|
|
Just wanted to point out that when you step up to a high performance a/c, it may seem like you’re always flying into 25-30 kt headwinds both ways on trips.
In that scenario, starting out 10-15 kts slower can leave you with a very unimpressive GS.
If you need to the UL, you may not care.
Good luck
Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 13:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/30/10 Posts: 4133 Post Likes: +2125 Location: Kingston, NY (20N)
Aircraft: 1985 Bonanza F33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Having made this same choice, I chose the PA32 albeit a Lance. The toga and Bo will be so close in speed, it really should not be the largest factor.
Take your people, add bags, and try to get that into each plane. Pay close attention to the W&B on the Bo. Can you be in balance wheels up to wheels down? The nose baggage on the PA32 is a huge game changer to me. Makes our family trips doable. I was unable to get the Bo in balance without leaving someone or bags on the ground.
The 80-85 Togas are the sweet spot before the reboot PA32s gained a lot of weight. The two really are not comparable in speed. The older Saratoga I flew (1988) was an honest 155kt ROP airplane and the 2001 was an honest 165kt ROP airplane. The Saratoga is a nice wise useful cabin, but the forward visibility is not as good as the Bonanza, and it flies more like a Cessna, heavy on the controls than a Bonanza. A good 79-90s Bonanza should be a 170kt airplane LOP.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 13:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/13/07 Posts: 19859 Post Likes: +9566 Location: Seeley Lake, MT (23S)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The older Saratoga I flew (1988) was an honest 155kt ROP airplane and the 2001 was an honest 165kt ROP airplane. "Honest". Fascinating use of that word. Are there dishonest speeds?
_________________ Want to go here?: https://tinyurl.com/FlyMT1
tinyurl.com/35som8p
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 14:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/11/11 Posts: 250 Post Likes: +178 Location: Lake Placid, FL
Aircraft: A36, B737 at work
|
|
Marty,
I had a PA32 for a while, wife loved it, she never had to ask "can I bring...." so much baggage space! W&B never an issue with the forward baggage you could always find a way to balance it out.
Kids got older, didn't need as much space for cribs, strollers, etc. so sold it and went into a V-Tail. Kids now in the teens and always want to bring friends, so back into a 6 place. Wife loved the V-tail, single yoke, stowable rudder pedals, so she felt more spacious in the front seat. So she wanted another Bonanza, as she says she's a Beech Girl now! The A36 offers more speed, beefier airframe, smoother ride. However we both miss the luggage carrying ability of the PA32.
I installed the aft baggage mod on our 74' A36 and that made a big difference, 1978 and later already have the aft baggage area.
Would I go back to a PA32, no, I love my A36. It's extremly rare I need the luggage capacity of the PA32. I'm getting 165KTAS LOP on my IO-520 RamCam'd A36 at 11GPH, that makes me happy.
Best of luck,
Russell
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Saratoga vs A36 - Handling Characteristics Posted: 28 Oct 2019, 14:59 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/22/12 Posts: 518 Post Likes: +270
|
|
I can add some data points as I routinely fly the 73 A36 that I own and a friend's 07 Saratoga. As a pilot it's night and day how much better the Bonanza flies. Here are some pros and cons:
A36- (with IO550 conversion and aft baggage mod) Pros - 10-12kts faster (170 vs 160 ROP) -excellent useful load 1370lbs (almost 1000 with full fuel)- older lighter plane - good short field, soft field, you name it - controls feel solid and responsive -excellent baggage space with aft baggage mod and between 1st two rows of seats when in club configuration
Cons -smaller cabin especially in 3rd row
Saratoga- (2007 with Air Conditioning and TKS) Pros -Larger more comfortable cabin -forward baggage compartment (not too big) -better creature comforts, nicer seats, A/C (newer plane)
Cons -Slower by 10-12 knots on same fuel burn -heavier plane - useful load 1150, (under 600 pounds full fuel) -runway hog especially hot and heavy -controls feel dull and heavy
Both great planes, but as an owner pilot- A36 all day
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|