banner
banner

19 Apr 2024, 09:02 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2019, 07:55 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4959
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
I have a glass windshield in my F model too.


Top

 Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2019, 12:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/09
Posts: 332
Post Likes: +272
Company: Premier Bone and Joint
Location: Wyoming
Aircraft: BE90,HUSK,MU-2
My K model had a left side glass windshield installed at the factory in ‘74. My right side plexiglass windshield cracked at altitude a few years ago and it was difficult to find a new one because MHI was in the process of switching to stretched acrylic. I elected to change out both side windows to stretched acrylic and got a field approval for heated glass on the right side windshield as well so now I’ve got left and right heated glass similar to the P and Solitaire models but without “High Heat” although I’ve not seen the Low Heat have trouble keeping up with icing.

_________________
Thomas


Top

 Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2019, 14:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/30/13
Posts: 409
Post Likes: +71
Company: Cruce Aircraft Services
Location: KPGD
Aircraft: Learjet 55, C-310
Interesting. I was thinking the plastic windshield would be ‘cheaper’ to operate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2019, 19:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/09
Posts: 332
Post Likes: +272
Company: Premier Bone and Joint
Location: Wyoming
Aircraft: BE90,HUSK,MU-2
It may be, not sure. The glass seems to last longer but costs more to replace. But the new stretched acrylic windshields are pretty pricey (2-3x the old). Glass has slightly more visual aberration than acrylic due to the wire mesh, but if you fly in a place that has icing, while the alcohol slush windshield certainly works, glass-electric seems far superior and is certainly the mode of ice protection utilized in most other turboprops and turbofans. I had a catastrophic failure from one corner to the other at altitude due to hidden weakness that was not caught despite the mandated inspection only a couple days prior (I was flying home after inspection)...that worried me and I haven’t heard of that happening to glass windshields (I’m sure it can, but just haven’t seen a spontaneous full-width glass failure with decompression in the absence of any impact). That, along with the fact that acrylic was not available for many months prompted me to select glass. I’ve heard of some MU-2 pilots who (when their glass windshield needed replacement) elected to go back to acrylic and alcohol.

_________________
Thomas


Top

 Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question
PostPosted: 25 Dec 2019, 14:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/09/16
Posts: 541
Post Likes: +157
Location: Utah
Aircraft: MU-2B
I was able to confirm that a short body M model will fit in a hangar with 20' 10'' T dimensions. Here is the picture for proof. I do have the hard static wick on the fuel tanks as well. There is under 1'' clearance on the hard static wick.

My exact T box end demotions were 20' 10'' But that was to the door not to where the door grate starts. So I suspect you could get really close to fitting in an airplane with anything over 20'' from the fuel tank to the raydome


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.