08 May 2025, 23:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 13:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/22/12 Posts: 569 Post Likes: +379
|
|
Hey guys- looking to find out the distance between trailing edge of wing and most aft portion of tail to see if it will fit in our hangar. Looking at short bodies. Can't find online. Thanks!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 13:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/07/17 Posts: 6976 Post Likes: +5868 Company: Malco Power Design Location: KLVJ
Aircraft: 1976 Baron 58
|
|
Funny
I was looking for the dimension from the trailing edge of the wing to the furthest forward point of the nose. That’s the limiting factor in my hangar. My Baron barely fits. I’m guessing an MU2 won’t but gotta get a tape measure out to be sure.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 15:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4085 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Funny
I was looking for the dimension from the trailing edge of the wing to the furthest forward point of the nose. That’s the limiting factor in my hangar. My Baron barely fits. I’m guessing an MU2 won’t but gotta get a tape measure out to be sure. If a Baron is tight its unlikely the Mu2 will fit. At KDVT an Mu2 fits in a big City hangar, a King Air 90 will also fit. A 690 won't. In fact not much else does besides for a Cirrus or TBM or PA46. These are the published KDVT dimensions. There are several different generations of our muni hangars but they all work for Mu. Attachment: Capture.JPG
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 20:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3078 Post Likes: +1048 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Funny
I was looking for the dimension from the trailing edge of the wing to the furthest forward point of the nose. That’s the limiting factor in my hangar. My Baron barely fits. I’m guessing an MU2 won’t but gotta get a tape measure out to be sure. From the rear of the tip tanks to the nose is pretty close to 20 feet.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 21:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7289 Post Likes: +4785 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: From the rear of the tip tanks to the nose is pretty close to 20 feet. Yep. 20’. Actually 19’ 11”.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 22:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/26/09 Posts: 1470 Post Likes: +978 Company: ElitAire Location: Columbus, OH - KCMH
Aircraft: Piaggio P180
|
|
Our hangar ( https://akr.airspaceplace.com/diagram/) is nominally 20’ and just barely fits. And by barely, I mean the hangar door insulation and nose and tip tank static wicks and back wall, are intimate when closed.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 16 Oct 2019, 22:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/22/12 Posts: 569 Post Likes: +379
|
|
Thanks for that diagram and info. If you can measure the exact length sometime from nose to static wick, I’d be appreciative.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 17 Oct 2019, 15:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7289 Post Likes: +4785 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks for that diagram and info. If you can measure the exact length sometime from nose to static wick, I’d be appreciative. I have measured the exact length on my Solitaire. As accurately as I can get it using a laser line, it is 19’11”. That does include the static wick, but I have the stiff style static wicks. They are responsible for about 2” by my guess.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 17 Oct 2019, 16:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/22/12 Posts: 569 Post Likes: +379
|
|
Turns out the wing box depth is 20’ in the hangar. Should fit after all!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 17 Oct 2019, 16:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7289 Post Likes: +4785 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Turns out the wing box depth is 20’ in the hangar. Should fit after all! It’ll be close/tight. Get a good chock or whatever installed so you can’t accidentally go too far, and in a hangar I have that’s close I’ve got a chock I put in front before I close the door plus painted a line behind which I need the nose wheel to be, just to be sure. But for the capability it is a nicely compact airplane!
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/30/13 Posts: 416 Post Likes: +71 Company: Cruce Aircraft Services Location: KPGD
Aircraft: Learjet 55, C-310
|
|
Does anyone know when the Mu2 changed windshields to glass?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 00:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7289 Post Likes: +4785 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Does anyone know when the Mu2 changed windshields to glass? I wouldn’t swear to it, but I believe it was with the P model. I think there are some M models that have been retrofitted though.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: MU2 short body dimension question Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 01:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/19/09 Posts: 382 Post Likes: +166 Location: Montego Bay, Jamaica W.I. (MKJS)
Aircraft: Baron B55/Cessna 140
|
|
John,
The switch over came around 75/76 glass windows required by the A10SW type certificate.
If I remember some of the earlier A2PC certified models can run both Plastic and Heated windows.
“A domestic type certificate, A10SW, was awarded MAI on January 20, 1976 and on July 1, 1976, the production inspection certificate was approved for MAI. The MU-2 was now to be certified in the United States through the Southwest Region of the FAA under the A10SW Type Certificate. Provisions of CAR 3 with special conditions continued to provide the certification basis for the A10SW airplanes. Serial Nos. 313,349,652, and 661 were certified under the A10SW type certificate. These airplanes had their own AFM/POM unique to their serial number”
“M” Model – Serial Nos. 319,320,322 through347, and 349 (Serial No. 349 has an A10SW T/C; other have A2PC T/C)
It’s a pain to change windows best plan to do an interior replacement as the entire front cabin has to come out to replace a windshield.
Regards, Nigel
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|