25 Apr 2024, 05:57 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 15 May 2019, 23:26 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/05/19 Posts: 109 Post Likes: +8 Location: TX; NM
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22T G5
|
|
I have owned and flown a Columbia 400. I believe it is a great plane with responsive handling qualities and it’s fast. Never mind its great ramp appeal. I thought it was a hanful of fun and great flying. Lots of good things to say about it. My question to the group is this: In shopping for a SE piston, how would the fact that Textron stopped production figure into your considering it as a viable option?
Last edited on 16 May 2019, 07:03, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 00:44 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/20/15 Posts: 103 Post Likes: +81
Aircraft: RV8 in progress
|
|
Stopped production but they still support it, don’t they?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 09:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/30/10 Posts: 1695 Post Likes: +826 Company: Ten Bits Ranch Location: Terlingua, TX
Aircraft: H35, F90, C205, C182
|
|
My instructor flys a lot of planes (over 20,000 total hours). He prefers the Columbia/Cessna 400 to almost any other single. I unfortunately, have not flown one.
My 2 cents...Cessna needed to add a parachute, keep the price competitive with SR22, then it would have sold to the Cirrus buyers.
It also looks better on paper and in person than the SR22. This design should have been successful for Cessna...I think Cessna corporate issues must have gotten in the way of a great plane.
KJ
Last edited on 16 May 2019, 09:57, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 09:56 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/03/18 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +424
Aircraft: 182P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My instructor flys a lot of planes (over 20,000 total hours). He prefers the Columbia/Cessna 400 to almost any other single.
My 2 cents...Cessna needed to add a parachute, keep the price competitive with SR22, then it would have sold to the Cirrus buyers.
KJ And the anemic useful load would have also needed attention. The side stick over a side yoke is terrific. -David
_________________ http://welch.com/n46pg/
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 10:07 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/05/19 Posts: 109 Post Likes: +8 Location: TX; NM
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22T G5
|
|
Great observations, all. So what say you in answer to the question in my OP:"... In shopping for a SE piston, how would the fact that Textron stopped production figure into your considering it as a viable option?"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 19:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/20/15 Posts: 103 Post Likes: +81
Aircraft: RV8 in progress
|
|
Wouldn’t stop me from buying one if I had the cash. Same with the good ol C210, no longer made but I’d buy one if it fit my mission.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 22:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/30/10 Posts: 1695 Post Likes: +826 Company: Ten Bits Ranch Location: Terlingua, TX
Aircraft: H35, F90, C205, C182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Great observations, all. So what say you in answer to the question in my OP:"... In shopping for a SE piston, how would the fact that Textron stopped production figure into your considering it as a viable option?" If you can get all the parts, I think the fact that the plane is out of production is a non factor. Many good Cessna planes are no longer in production and still hold a great value. KJ
Last edited on 16 May 2019, 23:01, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 22:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 4966 Post Likes: +4797
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been friends with Lance Neibuaer the original founder of Lancair and the guy who made that airplane happen for close to 20 years. We talked often as he navigated the certification of the 300 / 350 / 400... I watched him travel to Malaysia to attract an investor to save a company that was drowning in it's own success. They had a 2+ year back log for orders and a dealer network screaming for airplanes. They just needed funding to expand their production capabilities. They ousted him and took the "Lancair" name off the company, ego... they didn't like that it was his name. Not only did that send a bad marketing message, it also drew attention to the fact that Lancair was now owned by the "Chinese" and the compound effect was that they ran an amazing success story into the ground. Cessna bought Columbia out of bankruptcy for $25M...
$25M... to put that in perspective, less than the cost of one jet.
It is hands down the most stable, fun to fly and fast airplane in it's class.
I wouldn't hesitate to buy one! I believe a hailstorm that wiped out $25 million in airplanes also didn't help the Columbia story. I also believe the attempt by Cessna to build composites in Mexico didn't help their situation.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 16 May 2019, 23:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/30/15 Posts: 1703 Post Likes: +1728 Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
|
|
1600 hours in Columbia 350 30 hours and counting in Cirrus SR22 G5 Flying qualities...hands down Columbia but Cirrus is good. As to your question (I own a 35 yr out of production Aerostar- currently at paint shop) Repairs and parts will just cost a bit more. Columbia....VNE of 235 knots Pop speed brakes and descend at 6000fpm at about 215 KIAS..... If Cessna woulda put a chute in and exchanged Utility category for normal with higher useful load then WOW
_________________ I wanna go phastR.....and slowR
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Columbia/Corvalis/TTX Question Posted: 17 May 2019, 08:04 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 6787 Post Likes: +7340 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1600 hours in Columbia 350 30 hours and counting in Cirrus SR22 G5 Flying qualities...hands down Columbia... and exchanged Utility category for normal with higher useful load then WOW That right there. We had a Columbia 400 in inventory back in the sales days... I called Lance after an unsuccessful attempt to move the beast by hand tow bar and said “why does your damn plastic airplane weigh so much more than our 182?” He said his engineers estimate that it is 225% overbuilt. He deeply regrets going Utility category.
_________________ It’s a brave new world, one where most have forgotten the old ways.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|