banner
banner

23 Apr 2024, 03:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 09 Sep 2019, 00:05 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 12/23/14
Posts: 1
Company: jeh equipment leasing
Aircraft: cirrus sr 20
Username Protected wrote:
Set the 210 up in cruise with the gear down, mark the speed. Then retract the gear and mark the speed. That will tell you how much of a factor the gear is. The rest is in the airfoil, and other airframe cleanup.

I flew a T210 for 9 years. Fly a 185 IO550 now. 145 kt on 6:00-6. (small tires because the ground is frozen when I’m on wheels, and I’m hard on tires as I learn to fly taildragger, so I may as well fly the cheap ones for now!) 125 kt on Aerocet amphibs.

The 185 doesn’t have strut cuffs, or any other aerodynamic refinements. It doesn’t slip through the ether, it smashes its way through by burning lots of fuel. It’s spartan, utilitarian, a Swiss Army Knife of airplanes, and I like it, or I’d still have the T210.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 09 Sep 2019, 10:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/17/12
Posts: 589
Post Likes: +340
Location: Greensboro, NC
Aircraft: C170B, BE35, CRJ
Username Protected wrote:
In the 180/185 if you’re look8ng for speed, Snyder would tell you one secret is a larger and heavier tail wheel. It is out of the airflow in cruise and being heavier and further aft helps CG. Shhh don’t tell everyone. :coffee:


I was always curious why Tommy Rose’s airplane had a big tailwheel. His airplane didn’t look that radical, and I always hear him mentioned as having had a fast airframe.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 09 Sep 2019, 14:20 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 8078
Post Likes: +5774
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
Username Protected wrote:
Set the 210 up in cruise with the gear down, mark the speed. Then retract the gear and mark the speed. That will tell you how much of a factor the gear is. The rest is in the airfoil, and other airframe cleanup.


Isn't cruise speed greater than the max speed to operate the gear? It is on the 182RG.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 10 Sep 2019, 08:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/11
Posts: 9168
Post Likes: +17163
Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
Well boys, unless you wanna call my Garmin 430W a liar :bugeye: or insinuate, like my friend Stan M. has :D , that I don't know how to perform a 4 way speed check, the Psycho Billy Skywagon will cruise 145 knots. :thumbup:

But you can't have both. Big wheels, no pants, etc. and you have a 135 knot airplane.

Usually, a Cessna 195 will handily walk away from a 180/185. I have posted, on the 195 FB site, an upcoming "race" between my 195, which is pretty quick itself, and the 180. Seven thousand feet, max cruise RPM and full throttle which will give both airplanes about 71% power I think.

I will "film" the results. It should be interesting. :thumbup:

Jg

_________________
Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.