banner
banner

17 Apr 2024, 23:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 12:46 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/02/15
Posts: 2718
Post Likes: +1707
Location: Fresno, CA
Aircraft: T210M
Username Protected wrote:
>>>The other problem is, you just admitted to a pilot deviation by being 300' off your assigned altitude on a recorded party line....<<<

Well not if this were the accepted practice under new RVSM rules.


Good luck with that!



Like I said, way too practical.

Another way, is that there might be a way for avionics to display enough raw data to figure out the ASE in the cockpit. Then instead of setting 29.92 we would correct by setting something different.
_________________
Tom DeWitt
Previous: TBM850/T210M/C182P
APS 2004


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 15:23 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Is there a way to determine our ASE when operating in the Flight Levels?

Not by any means relying solely on typical equipment in your airplane.

Test flights use calibrated air data booms or trailing static cones to do this.

FAA uses 3 different monitoring methods:

GPS Based Monitoring Unit (GMU), which collects data and is post processed AFTER the flight to determine what the ASE was.

Aircraft Geometric Height Measurement Element (AGHME), which are a few specific locations across the country with ground based means to measure height. RVSM aircraft were required to fly by one of them every 2 years under certain circumstances to maintain RVSM status.

And now ADS-B Height Monitoring, a real time monitoring using ADS-B geometric and baro heights.

Here is more info

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/separat ... ssions.pdf

Quote:
I can get my GPS altitude from my GTN750 but without knowing the correction factor it has no relevance.

Without a model of the current atmosphere around you, you can't do it in the cockpit. Your pressure height is basically the weight of the air below you and that varies with temperature, altimeter setting, and even the speed of the air movement.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 15:57 
Offline




 Profile




Joined: 09/04/09
Posts: 6224
Post Likes: +2729
Location: Doylestown, PA (KDYL)
Aircraft: 1979 Baron 58P
Username Protected wrote:
Is there a way to determine our ASE when operating in the Flight Levels?

Not by any means relying solely on typical equipment in your airplane.

Test flights use calibrated air data booms or trailing static cones to do this.

FAA uses 3 different monitoring methods:

GPS Based Monitoring Unit (GMU), which collects data and is post processed AFTER the flight to determine what the ASE was.

Aircraft Geometric Height Measurement Element (AGHME), which are a few specific locations across the country with ground based means to measure height. RVSM aircraft were required to fly by one of them every 2 years under certain circumstances to maintain RVSM status.

And now ADS-B Height Monitoring, a real time monitoring using ADS-B geometric and baro heights.

Here is more info

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/separat ... ssions.pdf

Quote:
I can get my GPS altitude from my GTN750 but without knowing the correction factor it has no relevance.

Without a model of the current atmosphere around you, you can't do it in the cockpit. Your pressure height is basically the weight of the air below you and that varies with temperature, altimeter setting, and even the speed of the air movement.

Mike C.

My read on the reg going into effect 1/20/19 is that if an aircraft is equipped with 2 independent altimeters, the AP maintains +/- 65ft, has an altitude alerter and ASE less than 200ft, that I'm allowed to use RSVM airspace, correct??

Could I query ATC as to my ADSB altitude while at FL280 to establish my ASE before using the RSVM altitudes? I realize the ASE at 280 may be different than at 410, but practically a King Air is limited to 320-330.
_________________
Rick Witt
Doylestown, PA
& Destin, FL


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 16:28 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
My read on the reg going into effect 1/20/19 is that if an aircraft is equipped with 2 independent altimeters, the AP maintains +/- 65ft, has an altitude alerter and ASE less than 200ft, that I'm allowed to use RSVM airspace, correct??

For a pre 1997 certified airplane without TCAS:

1. Two independent altitude measuring systems (may imply two static ports as well as two altimeters).
2. AP holds altitude +/- 130 ft in smooth air.
3. Altitude alerter +/- 300 ft.
4. ADS-B 1090ES.

The ASE statement is NOT an equipment requirement, but an OPERATIONAL one.

Quote:
Could I query ATC as to my ADSB altitude while at FL280 to establish my ASE before using the RSVM altitudes? I realize the ASE at 280 may be different than at 410, but practically a King Air is limited to 320-330.

I don't think you need to query ATC at all. Get the equipment required and go fly. If your ASE is off, ATC will tell you and clear you out of RVSM airspace.

That's what the rule implies as I read it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 17:17 
Offline




 Profile




Joined: 09/04/09
Posts: 6224
Post Likes: +2729
Location: Doylestown, PA (KDYL)
Aircraft: 1979 Baron 58P
Thanks Mike, that's my read as well! :thumbup: Now we get to see how it is applied. :scratch:

_________________
Rick Witt
Doylestown, PA
& Destin, FL


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 17:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 6308
Post Likes: +3800
Location: San Carlos, CA - KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
And now ADS-B Height Monitoring, a real time monitoring using ADS-B geometric and baro heights.

Here is more info

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/separat ... ssions.pdf

Not clear when this doc was written, but it kind of implies they are keeping a database of altimetry data for individual aircraft, see page 19 talking about a statistical process and QC monitoring. It also talks about RVSM approvals database. It does not say what it would take to get the approval via any new ASE/ADSB monitoring system, but it implies there may be some process.

BUT - no idea how old this doc is. It could be referring only to the “old” system of RVSM approval.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 17:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/10/10
Posts: 938
Post Likes: +621
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Aircraft: Conquest
Just for fun I sent a request to AOPA to see what they had to say about it. This is the response I got:

Hello John,

Thanks for your patience on this. I brought your issue to my co-worker in our Washington D.C. office because he works more closely with the FAA on issues such as this. He wasn't able to get to consult with the FAA due to the government shut down but was able to discuss it with GAMA and NBAA. It is our agreement that the aircraft certification requirements will remain the same, the rule change only changes the need for an LOA if the aircraft is equipped with a certified ADS-b and does not change the other equipment requirements that would be needed to bring the aircraft into RVSM compliance, such as through the applicable appropriate Service Bulletins (SB), Service Letters (SL), Engineering Change Orders (ECO), or Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs). The best way to answer your question about legacy aircraft is if your aircraft is not certified to fly in RVSM airspace currently, getting ADS-b will not change that, it would still need to meet all the RVSM equipment requirements spelled out in Appendix G to Part 91 Operations in RVSM airspace. I hope that answers your question, feel free to contact us if you have more questions or comments.

Fly Safe!
Mark Milkovitz
Senior Aviation Technical Specialist, AOPA Pilot Information Center

_________________
----Still emotionally attached to my Baron----


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 19:58 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The best way to answer your question about legacy aircraft is if your aircraft is not certified to fly in RVSM airspace currently, getting ADS-b will not change that, it would still need to meet all the RVSM equipment requirements spelled out in Appendix G to Part 91 Operations in RVSM airspace.

...which includes an entirely new section 9 which DOES NOT use section 2 and 3 covering AIRCRAFT and OPERATORS.

Section 9 has a simple list of equipment you must have. No RVSM certification.

If the FAA meant the new rule to require the OLD way, they would have written it to REQUIRE the section 2 AIRCRAFT approval.

It does not.

It says that VERY clearly in the opening sentence of the OLD way:

Section 2. Aircraft Approval

(a) Except as specified in Section 9 of this appendix, an operator may be authorized to conduct RVSM operations if the Administrator finds that its aircraft comply with this section.


In section 9, there is no "Administrator" language. This means no RVSM certification.

Section 9. Aircraft Equipped With Automatic Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast Out

An operator is authorized to conduct flight in airspace in which RVSM is applied provided:

(a) The aircraft is equipped with the following:

(1) Two operational independent altitude measurement systems.

(2) At least one automatic altitude control system that controls the aircraft altitude—

(i) Within a tolerance band of ±65 feet about an acquired altitude when the aircraft is operated in straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions; or

(ii) Within a tolerance band of ±130 feet under nonturbulent, nongust conditions for aircraft for which application for type certification occurred on or before April 9, 1997 that are equipped with an automatic altitude control system with flight management/performance system inputs.

(3) An altitude alert system that signals an alert when the altitude displayed to the flight crew deviates from the selected altitude by more than—

(i) ±300 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification was made on or before April 9, 1997; or

(ii) ±200 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification is made after April 9, 1997.

(4) A TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (Version 7.0), or a later version, if equipped with TCAS II, unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator.

(5) Unless authorized by ATC or the foreign country where the aircraft is operated, an ADS-B Out system that meets the equipment performance requirements of § 91.227 of this part. The aircraft must have its height-keeping performance monitored in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator.

(b) The altimetry system error (ASE) of the aircraft does not exceed 200 feet when operating in RVSM airspace.


If anyone says the new rule requires section 2 aircraft approval process to fly in RVSM airspace, they are reading it wrong.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 20:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 8448
Post Likes: +3685
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
Section 9 has a simple list of equipment you must have. No RVSM certification.

If the FAA meant the new rule to require the OLD way, they would have written it to REQUIRE the section 2 AIRCRAFT approval.

It does not.

It says that VERY clearly in the opening sentence of the OLD way:

Section 2. Aircraft Approval

(a) Except as specified in Section 9 of this appendix, an operator may be authorized to conduct RVSM operations if the Administrator finds that its aircraft comply with this section.


In section 9, there is no "Administrator" language. This means no RVSM certification.

Section 9. Aircraft Equipped With Automatic Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast Out

An operator is authorized to conduct flight in airspace in which RVSM is applied provided:

(a) The aircraft is equipped with the following:

(1) Two operational independent altitude measurement systems.

(2) At least one automatic altitude control system that controls the aircraft altitude—

(i) Within a tolerance band of ±65 feet about an acquired altitude when the aircraft is operated in straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions; or

(ii) Within a tolerance band of ±130 feet under nonturbulent, nongust conditions for aircraft for which application for type certification occurred on or before April 9, 1997 that are equipped with an automatic altitude control system with flight management/performance system inputs.

(3) An altitude alert system that signals an alert when the altitude displayed to the flight crew deviates from the selected altitude by more than—

(i) ±300 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification was made on or before April 9, 1997; or

(ii) ±200 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification is made after April 9, 1997.

(4) A TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (Version 7.0), or a later version, if equipped with TCAS II, unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator.

(5) Unless authorized by ATC or the foreign country where the aircraft is operated, an ADS-B Out system that meets the equipment performance requirements of § 91.227 of this part. The aircraft must have its height-keeping performance monitored in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator.

(b) The altimetry system error (ASE) of the aircraft does not exceed 200 feet when operating in RVSM airspace.


If anyone says the new rule requires section 2 aircraft approval process to fly in RVSM airspace, they are reading it wrong.

Mike C.


And yet in the comments section, the FAA says:

One commenter stated the use of ADS–B technology will deconflict aircraft within RVSM airspace without the need for expensive altimetry instruments. The FAA notes that for an aircraft to be eligible for operations in RVSM airspace it must meet strict height-keeping performance standards. ADS–B Out provides information used to determine an aircraft’s ASE. ADS–B alone does not provide operators with the requisite height-keeping capability to conduct operations in RVSM airspace safely. Accordingly, the installation of a qualified ADS–B Out system in an aircraft that does not have the altitude keeping capability necessary to meet RVSM performance requirements would not permit that aircraft to operate in RVSM airspace.

Altitude keeping cabability is part of the RVSM cert. The new rules do not remove that cert requirement.


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2019, 20:18 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Altitude keeping cabability is part of the RVSM cert. The new rules do not remove that cert requirement.

Show me where the rules require it.

The new rule says you may operate in RVSM airspace if:

(2) The aircraft—

(i) Has been approved and complies with Section 2 this appendix; or

(ii) Complies with Section 9 of this appendix.


Section 9 is just the list of equipment you need, note the lack of the word APPROVED. Section 9 aircraft do NOT need to be approved.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 10 Jan 2019, 13:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/18/10
Posts: 458
Post Likes: +114
Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
Username Protected wrote:
Section 9 has a simple list of equipment you must have. No RVSM certification.

If the FAA meant the new rule to require the OLD way, they would have written it to REQUIRE the section 2 AIRCRAFT approval.

It does not.

It says that VERY clearly in the opening sentence of the OLD way:

Section 2. Aircraft Approval

(a) Except as specified in Section 9 of this appendix, an operator may be authorized to conduct RVSM operations if the Administrator finds that its aircraft comply with this section.


In section 9, there is no "Administrator" language. This means no RVSM certification.

Section 9. Aircraft Equipped With Automatic Dependent Surveillance—Broadcast Out

An operator is authorized to conduct flight in airspace in which RVSM is applied provided:

(a) The aircraft is equipped with the following:

(1) Two operational independent altitude measurement systems.

(2) At least one automatic altitude control system that controls the aircraft altitude—

(i) Within a tolerance band of ±65 feet about an acquired altitude when the aircraft is operated in straight and level flight under nonturbulent, nongust conditions; or

(ii) Within a tolerance band of ±130 feet under nonturbulent, nongust conditions for aircraft for which application for type certification occurred on or before April 9, 1997 that are equipped with an automatic altitude control system with flight management/performance system inputs.

(3) An altitude alert system that signals an alert when the altitude displayed to the flight crew deviates from the selected altitude by more than—

(i) ±300 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification was made on or before April 9, 1997; or

(ii) ±200 feet for aircraft for which application for type certification is made after April 9, 1997.

(4) A TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (Version 7.0), or a later version, if equipped with TCAS II, unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator.

(5) Unless authorized by ATC or the foreign country where the aircraft is operated, an ADS-B Out system that meets the equipment performance requirements of § 91.227 of this part. The aircraft must have its height-keeping performance monitored in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator.

(b) The altimetry system error (ASE) of the aircraft does not exceed 200 feet when operating in RVSM airspace.


If anyone says the new rule requires section 2 aircraft approval process to fly in RVSM airspace, they are reading it wrong.

Mike C.


And yet in the comments section, the FAA says:

One commenter stated the use of ADS–B technology will deconflict aircraft within RVSM airspace without the need for expensive altimetry instruments. The FAA notes that for an aircraft to be eligible for operations in RVSM airspace it must meet strict height-keeping performance standards. ADS–B Out provides information used to determine an aircraft’s ASE. ADS–B alone does not provide operators with the requisite height-keeping capability to conduct operations in RVSM airspace safely. Accordingly, the installation of a qualified ADS–B Out system in an aircraft that does not have the altitude keeping capability necessary to meet RVSM performance requirements would not permit that aircraft to operate in RVSM airspace.

Altitude keeping cabability is part of the RVSM cert. The new rules do not remove that cert requirement.


The altitude keeping capability I'm reading to be (b) of section 9: (b) The altimetry system error (ASE) of the aircraft does not exceed 200 feet when operating in RVSM airspace.

I agree with Mike's reading of the rule. The big question that remains is how ASE is determined prior to operating in RVSM airspace. I can't imagine just go try it is the answer.

Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 10 Jan 2019, 13:22 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The big question that remains is how ASE is determined prior to operating in RVSM airspace. I can't imagine just go try it is the answer.

There's nothing you can do to be sure your ASE is within bounds before you go fly in RVSM airspace, EVEN for aircraft with RVSM kits approved under the old section 2 method.

The ASE is a requirement for OPERATING in RVSM airspace. A real time, in the moment check of your ASE. You can't do that on board, ATC can do that with the FAA algorithms.

I think this will be much like a mode C stop squawk ATC command. Your mode C differs from your real altitude by too much, so they command you to stop mode C squawk. For RVSM, it would be cleared out of RVSM airspace (FL280 or FL430).

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 10 Jan 2019, 16:07 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/18/10
Posts: 458
Post Likes: +114
Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
Username Protected wrote:
The big question that remains is how ASE is determined prior to operating in RVSM airspace. I can't imagine just go try it is the answer.

There's nothing you can do to be sure your ASE is within bounds before you go fly in RVSM airspace, EVEN for aircraft with RVSM kits approved under the old section 2 method.

The ASE is a requirement for OPERATING in RVSM airspace. A real time, in the moment check of your ASE. You can't do that on board, ATC can do that with the FAA algorithms.

I think this will be much like a mode C stop squawk ATC command. Your mode C differs from your real altitude by too much, so they command you to stop mode C squawk. For RVSM, it would be cleared out of RVSM airspace (FL280 or FL430).

Mike C.


Agreed, but with a section 2 aircraft the expectation appears to be >99% compliance within 200 feet. I gather from other comments that with a non-corrected altimeter the expectation of compliance will be quite a bit lower.

Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 10 Jan 2019, 18:21 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Agreed, but with a section 2 aircraft the expectation appears to be >99% compliance within 200 feet. I gather from other comments that with a non-corrected altimeter the expectation of compliance will be quite a bit lower.

Maybe, maybe not.

Most of the folks talking about the new RVSM method are trying to get just into the low 30s. They are like MU2s certified to FL310 for which no RVSM STC exists and probably never will. In those cases, we're not talking about much of an extra altitude step and the basic instruments might do it. We are only talking about 10% thinner air.

For the aircraft that go into the low 40s, very different story, much harder. But then, those do have RVSM equipment you can buy, so you can get it installed and then go fly under the new rules. Most will already meet that requirement since they are almost all section 2 aircraft by now anyways.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: RVSM and ADSB
PostPosted: 10 Jan 2019, 22:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/18/10
Posts: 458
Post Likes: +114
Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
I ran some numbers assuming your altimeter has a constant error in pressure.

A 200' error at 310 is the equivalent of a 179' error at 280.

A 200' error at 350 (for a 441 say) is equivalent to a 153' error at 280.

Assuming I did my math right and my constant pressure error assumption is a good one, if you can be within 100' at 280 you can be within 200' at 350.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.