19 Apr 2021, 02:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 17:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/13 Posts: 824 Post Likes: +261 Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
any pireps, one for sale on barnstormers with 135 lycoming
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 17:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 4012 Post Likes: +3353
Aircraft: G44, R44, C501, APIS
|
|
It’s a terrible airplane. Poorly engineered. There’s one at my field that has been a structural mess
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 17:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/06/11 Posts: 126 Post Likes: +21 Location: West Chester, Ohio & Toronto, Ontario
Aircraft: Cessna C182
|
|
Good airplane as long as it's equipped with the engine it was designed for. Many people always think more HP is better and the extra weight is the issue as the previous poster mentioned.
I've seen a few damaged ones where the heavier engine causes rivits to literally shear along several structural members.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 18:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 11163 Post Likes: +15399 Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Aircraft: in storage
|
|
seems to be a difficult build. I'd suggest checking out a Rans.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 19:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 4012 Post Likes: +3353
Aircraft: G44, R44, C501, APIS
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Good airplane as long as it's equipped with the engine it was designed for. Many people always think more HP is better and the extra weight is the issue as the previous poster mentioned.
I've seen a few damaged ones where the heavier engine causes rivits to literally shear along several structural members. The one on the field has 180HP. Low time and lots of pulled rivets, bent landing gear structures, etc. I think I'd rather have a Glastar if I was in this market.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 20:07 |
|
 |

|
BeechTalk Vendor
|
Joined: 08/10/15 Posts: 243 Post Likes: +48
Aircraft: PA-18
|
|
Supercub would be a better route.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 20:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4139 Post Likes: +2750
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
I once wanted a Murphy airplane. I sited the factory in BC and talked to builders. To many told me the same thing....don’t get one.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: murphy rebel Posted: 23 Mar 2021, 22:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/25/15 Posts: 450 Post Likes: +114 Company: WillCo Engineering Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: Rentals
|
|
I have about 20 hours in one - I don’t recommend it. Don’t like the way it flew or the ground handling.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2021
|
|
|
|