banner
banner

19 Apr 2024, 13:14 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2018, 22:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/14/08
Posts: 42
Post Likes: +23
Aircraft: PIlatus PC-12/47
Username Protected wrote:
Can you elaborate on why the 560 MX cost is less than the CJ3 or PC12?

Here's an example:

Just had 2 static wicks and one mounting plate for one of the wicks replaced on my PC-12.

Total cost about $1,900.

Two static wicks!

This was done at an authorized Pilatus service center, which is -- for all practical purposes -- the only place you can go with a PC-12 for MX except for simple stuff like changing tires. A third party can't buy those really special Swiss authorized static wicks.

If you went to an official Cessna service center for a 560, it might cost about the same but -- the point is -- you can get the parts and have a competent non-Cessna shop do the work for a fraction of this cost.

I'm sure the work done on replacing these two static wicks is very well done. I have never had cause to complain about the quality of the work done at the Pilatus certified service center. But, my god, you pay for it with a PC-12.

And you don't have to, unless you choose to, with a Cessna product.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2018, 22:38 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/14/08
Posts: 42
Post Likes: +23
Aircraft: PIlatus PC-12/47
Username Protected wrote:

With Pilatus, you go to where they tell you to go and you pay for Swiss precision....

I don't feel my Pilatus is expensive to maintain.

I like swiss precision.
You can "feel" however you like.

The guy who manages my PC-12 shows me the invoices for managing a number of Cessna jets of various vintages. Apples to apples, unless doing the work at a Cessna Service Center, the cost is way less for the Cessna products.

RE. "Swiss Precision". I used to wear a Swiss "aviator" watch. It wasn't (nearly) as precise as the cheap quartz thing I now have. And, I had to wind it.

Not giving up my PC-12. But, I'm not a fanboy either.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 10 Nov 2018, 22:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/09
Posts: 332
Post Likes: +272
Company: Premier Bone and Joint
Location: Wyoming
Aircraft: BE90,HUSK,MU-2
True for a lot of older aircraft. I recently bought two rigid static wicks with the metal spike discharges from an authorized service center for my Mitsubishi...$190 for both. About 10% of the Swiss static wicks. Perhaps its like a Rolex compared to a Seiko...they both tell time, the Rolex just does it with more flair! :D

_________________
Thomas


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 07:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/23/09
Posts: 1071
Post Likes: +564
Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
Username Protected wrote:

The guy who manages my PC-12 shows me the invoices for managing a number of Cessna jets of various vintages. Apples to apples, unless doing the work at a Cessna Service Center, the cost is way less for the Cessna products.


ahh, he just wanted to get you hooked on the jet crack. :D What he didn’t show you was the frequency such invoices.

I leased a 560 Ultra and it was having something done to it every month. I take my PC-12 in once a year.

But at the end of the day, I would not discourage any friend from buying a jet. :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 09:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5303
Post Likes: +2423
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:
Maybe two hours. One way.....

And you technically don’t have to hire a pilot. All you need is a friend you like to be around for days on end who is also available and can afford to go the places you want to go when you want to go for as long as you want to go with a PPL, ME, and IFR. Any way you look at owning a jet you’ll have a mentor pilot for sure for a while.
Top is PC12; bottom is LJ45XR.

FIFY

No doubt the Lear 45 is a game changer..... what do I do on my 4-5 250-500NM flights per week I already do? Call my buddy every time? It's not going to happen. I fly way too much.

You also notice on your chart how much faster the PC12 gets when you fly it lower into the headwinds. Probably 5 hours. Man that Lear 45 burns some gas. What's the full fuel payload?


“. The Learjet 45 has the direct operating costs of a light jet, like a Cessna Citation II (around $1,800 an hour); flies a lot higher (51,000 feet), faster (534 mph) and farther (2,032 nautical miles with four passengers and IFR reserves); and has a more comfortable cabin (410 cubic feet). Payload with full fuel is a respectable 1,600 pounds, and up to 500 pounds of baggage can be split between nose and aft compartments

Bombardier began delivery of a longer range variant, the Learjet 45XR, in 2004. The aircraft features a 1,000-pound increase in maximum takeoff weight, slightly more fuel capacity and a pair of Honeywell TFE731-20-BR engines that reduce balanced field length at higher temperatures, improve time to climb and deliver better high-speed cruise. Under certain circumstances, the Learjet 45XR's performance improvement is dramatic. For example, out of Aspen, Colo., the XR with eight passengers aboard will fly almost 1,000 nautical miles farther than a standard Learjet 45. “. Business Traveler

Yes. Under a lot of circumstances two pilots suck. Short flights, Repo flights, personal flights. Yet under a lot of conditions they are a game changer. Cost of aquistion, work load, taking care of ground crap, etc. Hard to justify something like a Lear without business implications and also short flights. Personally I think the 12 is overall your cup of tea.

Awesome plane with antiquated avionics. I Guess that’s ok. It’s what I’m used to. Lear built the 70 and 75 around the 45 just put the G5000 in it. Extra 3-4 million. Part 25 aircraft.

PS. One can pretty much rent a SIC.
_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 10:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/16/10
Posts: 8891
Post Likes: +1956
Username Protected wrote:
the only place you can go with a PC-12 for MX except for simple stuff like changing tires.


You need a special jack adapter. I heard of one shop wanting to change a tire but could not purchase (refused) the adapter. So welded one up.

Asking....do the labour rates compare on other turbine shops?

_________________
If you think nobody cares about you. Try not paying your income tax.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 10:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6059
Post Likes: +703
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
Cannot talk about the Pilatus but the TBM shop Corporate Aircraft on your field John uses the same labour rate as other aircraft.
The TBM maintenance is mostly labour for inspections.




Username Protected wrote:
the only place you can go with a PC-12 for MX except for simple stuff like changing tires.


You need a special jack adapter. I heard of one shop wanting to change a tire but could not purchase (refused) the adapter. So welded one up.

Asking....do the labour rates compare on other turbine shops?

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 10:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13066
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Here's an example:

Just had 2 static wicks and one mounting plate for one of the wicks replaced on my PC-12.

Total cost about $1,900.

Two static wicks!

This was done at an authorized Pilatus service center, which is -- for all practical purposes -- the only place you can go with a PC-12 for MX except for simple stuff like changing tires. A third party can't buy those really special Swiss authorized static wicks.

If you went to an official Cessna service center for a 560, it might cost about the same but -- the point is -- you can get the parts and have a competent non-Cessna shop do the work for a fraction of this cost.

I'm sure the work done on replacing these two static wicks is very well done. I have never had cause to complain about the quality of the work done at the Pilatus certified service center. But, my god, you pay for it with a PC-12.

And you don't have to, unless you choose to, with a Cessna product.

I've never had to replace a static wick.

The Pilatus service center is on my home field. I don't want an airplane I have to fly somewhere to have serviced. That cost alone is more than $1900 static wicks. I know that's not the case for everyone but is for me.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 10:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13066
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
The guy who manages my PC-12

Why do you need a manager? I manage my own. There's nothing to it. Fire him and you just saved yourself a boat load.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 16:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 17605
Post Likes: +21337
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
Don't know where the above Citation II operating rates came from. Including Crew? We dry leased for $1,000 per hour two years ago. I think the V was $1,100.

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 17:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5303
Post Likes: +2423
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:
Don't know where the above Citation II operating rates came from. Including Crew? We dry leased for $1,000 per hour two years ago. I think the V was $1,100.


Dry? Add fuel.

_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 18:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 17605
Post Likes: +21337
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
That makes perfect sense; just didn’t know the basis of comparison.

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 11 Nov 2018, 18:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/29/14
Posts: 2883
Post Likes: +2936
Location: CEA3
Aircraft: PA24-260, C340 Ram 7
Username Protected wrote:
Can you elaborate on why the 560 MX cost is less than the CJ3 or PC12?

Here's an example:

Just had 2 static wicks and one mounting plate for one of the wicks replaced on my PC-12.

Total cost about $1,900.

Two static wicks!

This was done at an authorized Pilatus service center, which is -- for all practical purposes -- the only place you can go with a PC-12 for MX except for simple stuff like changing tires. A third party can't buy those really special Swiss authorized static wicks.

If you went to an official Cessna service center for a 560, it might cost about the same but -- the point is -- you can get the parts and have a competent non-Cessna shop do the work for a fraction of this cost.

I'm sure the work done on replacing these two static wicks is very well done. I have never had cause to complain about the quality of the work done at the Pilatus certified service center. But, my god, you pay for it with a PC-12.

And you don't have to, unless you choose to, with a Cessna product.


You also said base.

If it’s anything like a Boeings, those bases are bounded to structure using special silver enhanced stuff to make the base conduct to structure. It also has a relatively short shelf life. So you kinda have to compare apples to apples.

Murray

Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2018, 00:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2300
Post Likes: +707
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
I get the importance of single pilot. But.......90% of the time my wife (she’s a pilot) and I usually fly together. I was looking at Lear 40/45......wow........hard to beat their performance.?!? And the acquisition costs are same as a TBM? Now I dont know anything about Lear’s. Operating costs etc probably beyond reach........ looks like an awesome bird


Top

 Post subject: Re: Phenom 100E , Cessna M2 or Hondajet?
PostPosted: 16 Nov 2018, 06:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5303
Post Likes: +2423
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:
I get the importance of single pilot. But.......90% of the time my wife (she’s a pilot) and I usually fly together. I was looking at Lear 40/45......wow........hard to beat their performance.?!? And the acquisition costs are same as a TBM? Now I dont know anything about Lear’s. Operating costs etc probably beyond reach........ looks like an awesome bird


Same thoughts and situation. Yet the avionics are antiquated. Have to have a portable ADS-b in and IPad for much of a moving map. Ridiculous.

_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Marsh.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.