banner
banner

18 Apr 2024, 20:14 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Best T-prop <600K MU2, Commander, Merlin....???
PostPosted: 07 Feb 2020, 21:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1702
Post Likes: +1727
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
Username Protected wrote:
Then there is a huge segment of new(er) aircraft owners / pilots who are looking to become turbine aircraft owners / pilots. These folks primarily come out of the Cirrus and are looking for the next step, depending on their experience the next step may be a TBM-850, an M600, a King Air, a Mustang or a Citation M2 but one thing is a strong probability, that a Garmin Gxxx panel is going to be up front.


I've been flying for 12 years now and ~2,000 hrs. 8 of those years and about 1,200 of those hours were in birds with very conventional and rather crummy panels. Back then, that didn't bother me one bit. I enjoyed every bird I flew for different reasons: C172, C182, C206, Cher Six, Seneca II, C340 and a handful of others. When it came to considering upgrades, panel considerations were very low on my priority list. It just didn't matter to me. I was comfortable flying behind anything.

Today after (4) years behind G1000 and the GFC700 autopilot, I find myself with little desire to go back. The situational awareness, rock solid autopilot, everything you need right at your fingertips and the fact that it just all plain works all the time has begun to impact my perspective. Even if it meant waiting a couple more years until I could afford a bird equipped with Gx000 instead of moving up immediately into something that's more capable but with poor avionics, that's probably what I'd do.

Apart from the panel advantages, the other thing I wouldn't want to go back to is the endless list of squawks that seemed to accompany the older, more complex birds. 98% of my flights today are entirely squawk-free and headache-free. I know tprops aren't quite as bad but in the piston twins I flew 98% of my flights had multiple squawks. Any older airframe is going to have its fair share of issues. I'm sure for many that's not a big factor but when you're flying 300+ hrs / yr as I am, you just want the dang thing to work all the time.


Flying my 1982 Aerostar with Steam gauges in addition to 2014 Cirrus Perspective and GFC700....I have zero arguments with anything Don said....

Love them both....
Aerostar is phaster...and pressurized

Cirrus is easier
_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best T-prop <600K MU2, Commander, Merlin....???
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2020, 17:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/12
Posts: 610
Post Likes: +279
Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
I’m very happy with my Turbo Commander 690A. Modern glass panel, good range, performance and cabin. The luggage compartment is huge. So far, running it has been economic and the annual/150 hours have been not horribly expensive.
In order to step up from what I have, I think the costs would be quite a bit more, it would be turbofans and require much longer runways, which in much of Europe means airports which cost 3x as much for everything... I’m flying out of a 2700 foot long runway close to London. The short field performance of the Turbo Commander is impressive.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best T-prop <600K MU2, Commander, Merlin....???
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2020, 18:54 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 6986
Post Likes: +2963
Company: Dermatology
Location: ChattanoogaDayton, TN (2A0)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Username Protected wrote:
I’m very happy with my Turbo Commander 690A. Modern glass panel, good range, performance and cabin. The luggage compartment is huge. So far, running it has been economic and the annual/150 hours have been not horribly expensive.
In order to step up from what I have, I think the costs would be quite a bit more, it would be turbofans and require much longer runways, which in much of Europe means airports which cost 3x as much for everything... I’m flying out of a 2700 foot long runway close to London. The short field performance of the Turbo Commander is impressive.



Patrick,

Did you finally get made whole after the vandalizing/theft of your panel and instruments?

_________________
Jay P.
Having COVID over Christmas SUCKS!!!!!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best T-prop <600K MU2, Commander, Merlin....???
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2020, 19:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/12
Posts: 610
Post Likes: +279
Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
Yes, it’s all good now.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.Wingman 85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.AAI.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.