19 Apr 2024, 14:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: We only give clearances to helicopters... Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 23:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 57 Post Likes: +1 Company: CFM Location: Smyrna, TN
Aircraft: BE-10
|
|
So has anyone every been to KDAG in Barstow/Daggett CA? It was one of the fuel stops on a recent trip I made. Nothing at Airnav indicates anything unusual about it. Does seem to have an military base or something on it (airnav indicates 49% military traffic and when we were there we saw a lot of military helicopters). Anyway, on to the story:
We landed and refueled, then called FSS via telephone to pick up an IFR clearance. The weather was VFR with 4500 ft ceilings (bases were about 6500 MSL) but I was trying to do "the right thing." After being on hold for a few minutes, the briefer comes back and informs me that approach can only issue clearances to helicopters. I was annoyed that I had spent 5 minutes on the phone trying to pick up a clearance that I could've just got in the air so I quickly said thanks and hung up. We took off and called ATC. We got a squawk code, were id'd on radar, then told to expect our clearance as we climbed through 7,000 ft. I told the controller that we would be unable to maintain VFR as the ceilings were at 6500. He told me that their minimum vectoring altitude in that area was 7500 and that he was unable to issue a clearance until I reached that altitude. Hmm. I assume he could hear the sarcasm in my voice when I said "You guys seem to have a really good system here, what other options are available to us?" I was told I could turn back west (180 degrees from my intended course) to climb above or just look for a break in the clouds. I simply continued on course about 500 ft below the cloud deck and after a few minutes the controller must have sensed my frustration because he issued me a clearance.
This seemed really odd. What if the clouds had been much lower? How would I have obtained a clearance? Why do they only issue clearances to helicopters? Something else to mention, this airport has both a GPS 22 and a GPS 26 approach. As we were approaching to land we requested the GPS 26 but were denied because of the proximity of restricted airspace, which is close but not conflicting with the route on the approach. We were instead issued the GPS 26 approach.
Has anyone run into a situation like this before?
_________________ a.k.a. "CFII" a.k.a. "CFI 1"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: We only give clearances to helicopters... Posted: 02 Jan 2008, 12:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/23/07 Posts: 836 Post Likes: +32 Location: Brandon MS
Aircraft: Prior BE23 Owner
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Has anyone run into a situation like this before? There is a departure procedure in place http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0712/SW3TO.PDF, so it really sounds like ATC (OR FSS) may have dropped the ball on this one IF you filed the departure procedure Rwys 22, 26, climbing right turn heading 090° and DAG R-223 to DAG VORTAC, then climb in DAG holding pattern (NE, right turns, 223° inbound) to 7500 before departing on course. I'd call the ATC folks and see exactly what happened. Allen
_________________ Beechsundowner inflight Videos
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: We only give clearances to helicopters... Posted: 02 Jan 2008, 16:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/26/07 Posts: 3515 Post Likes: +2550 Company: BeechTalk Location: KJWN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Has anyone run into a situation like this before? There is a departure procedure in place http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0712/SW3TO.PDF, so it really sounds like ATC (OR FSS) may have dropped the ball on this one IF you filed the departure procedure
I dunno, sounds like they dropped the ball even if he didn't file the DP. My understanding is their standard operating procedure in the case that someone does not file a DP should be to amend the clearance unless "No DP" is in the remarks. Presuming he did not file No DP, they should assign it to him and then give clearance.
All that aside, DP or no, giving clearance only to helicopters is very peculiar.
_________________ CE-510 type, ATP Helicopter, BE90 recurrent, CE500 SPE, Baron 58 IPC, R22/R44 flight reviews
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: We only give clearances to helicopters... Posted: 02 Jan 2008, 17:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/23/07 Posts: 836 Post Likes: +32 Location: Brandon MS
Aircraft: Prior BE23 Owner
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I dunno, sounds like they dropped the ball even if he didn't file the DP. My understanding is their standard operating procedure in the case that someone does not file a DP should be to amend the clearance unless "No DP" is in the remarks. Presuming he did not file No DP, they should assign it to him and then give clearance.
All that aside, DP or no, giving clearance only to helicopters is very peculiar. I think the annotation no DP means you do not have a written copy in your possession, that's all that is. DP is never "mandatory" just as a STAR is not mandatory. Now, that's not to say like you say above, you won't get the amended clearance that "just so happens" to be the DP, or even radar vectors that just "happens" to put you on the DP. Same would go for a STAR, you can put no STAR, but I'd bet the radar vectors would just so happen to put on on that STAR along with the other arrivals. Whatever the case, something slipped up..... Allen
_________________ Beechsundowner inflight Videos
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: We only give clearances to helicopters... Posted: 03 Jan 2008, 13:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/16/07 Posts: 17605 Post Likes: +21337 Company: Real Estate development Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So has anyone every been to KDAG in Barstow/Daggett CA? It was one of the fuel stops on a recent trip I made. Nothing at Airnav indicates anything unusual about it. Does seem to have an military base or something on it (airnav indicates 49% military traffic and when we were there we saw a lot of military helicopters). Anyway, on to the story:
We landed and refueled, then called FSS via telephone to pick up an IFR clearance. The weather was VFR with 4500 ft ceilings (bases were about 6500 MSL) but I was trying to do "the right thing." After being on hold for a few minutes, the briefer comes back and informs me that approach can only issue clearances to helicopters. I was annoyed that I had spent 5 minutes on the phone trying to pick up a clearance that I could've just got in the air so I quickly said thanks and hung up. We took off and called ATC. We got a squawk code, were id'd on radar, then told to expect our clearance as we climbed through 7,000 ft. I told the controller that we would be unable to maintain VFR as the ceilings were at 6500. He told me that their minimum vectoring altitude in that area was 7500 and that he was unable to issue a clearance until I reached that altitude. Hmm. I assume he could hear the sarcasm in my voice when I said "You guys seem to have a really good system here, what other options are available to us?" I was told I could turn back west (180 degrees from my intended course) to climb above or just look for a break in the clouds. I simply continued on course about 500 ft below the cloud deck and after a few minutes the controller must have sensed my frustration because he issued me a clearance.
This seemed really odd. What if the clouds had been much lower? How would I have obtained a clearance? Why do they only issue clearances to helicopters? Something else to mention, this airport has both a GPS 22 and a GPS 26 approach. As we were approaching to land we requested the GPS 26 but were denied because of the proximity of restricted airspace, which is close but not conflicting with the route on the approach. We were instead issued the GPS 26 approach.
Has anyone run into a situation like this before? Have you ever called back later and asked? If you're not comfortable with that, ask a flight instructor that is familiar with the area. I've called several times and either gotten answers to my questions, or gone to the FAA with recommended changes that have lead to modifications in some cases. You can also ask FSDO or Flight Standards in OKC. Just be nice when you call and say you are trying to understand something that doesn't seem to make sense. Start with someone you know well like a flight instructor, if it doesn't make sense then, call back and ask departure how one is to get out of there IFR. Inquiries like this can lead to positive changes or good answers that one needs to understand if they frequent that area. One can never count on getting a clearance in the air in time to stay out of low IMC; therefore, I don't depart without a clearance unless I can get well along before I need the clearance. I've had better experiences calling departure direct for a clearance in many circumstances than calling LM. Best, Dave
|
|
Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|