banner
banner

16 Nov 2018, 05:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup



Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2018, 08:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 09/29/10
Posts: 3506
Post Likes: +1911
Company: USAF Simulator Instructor
Location: Burkburnett, TX
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
Username Protected wrote:
That is a good story.
I wonder if I can trust the NEWS media - especially with the need to support a certain view.

Since I personally know those involved in my scenario - I'm more likely to believe the factual nature of that event. I wonder was relevant facts were left out of that story?
Yes...I'm bias in this fact.

3.000' AGL? :coffee:
Not a reason that ANY aircraft couldn't get below a 3,000' AGL cloud layer.

I agree with Brian. Two points:
1. See the quote below from the article. True, the A-10C has no ground mapping radar but it does have a very accurate INS/GPS and a moving map display that gives near WAAS position accuracy. It also has an advanced radar altimeter with terrain avoidance capability. Letting down into the valley would be challenging but not the super-human task implied by the article.
Quote:
But the A-10 had no radar to guide them, no local maps, and no real way of safely penetrating the weather and avoiding the mountains surrounding the valley.


2. 3,000 foot ceilings are within the capability of most jet fighters. We routinely operated F-4s (not a very maneuverable aircraft in anyone’s book) under those kinds of ceilings in Okinawa and Korea.

Donald: Give it a rest.


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2018, 09:17 
Offline


 Profile

Joined: 01/21/14
Posts: 1574
Post Likes: +665
Company: FAA Flight Check
Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KOKC)
Aircraft: King Air 300F
Username Protected wrote:
That is a good story.
I wonder if I can trust the NEWS media - especially with the need to support a certain view.

Since I personally know those involved in my scenario - I'm more likely to believe the factual nature of that event. I wonder was relevant facts were left out of that story?
Yes...I'm bias in this fact.

3.000' AGL? :coffee:
Not a reason that ANY aircraft couldn't get below a 3,000' AGL cloud layer.

I agree with Brian. Two points:
1. See the quote below from the article. True, the A-10C has no ground mapping radar but it does have a very accurate INS/GPS and a moving map display that gives near WAAS position accuracy. It also has an advanced radar altimeter with terrain avoidance capability. Letting down into the valley would be challenging but not the super-human task implied by the article.
Quote:
But the A-10 had no radar to guide them, no local maps, and no real way of safely penetrating the weather and avoiding the mountains surrounding the valley.


2. 3,000 foot ceilings are within the capability of most jet fighters. We routinely operated F-4s (not a very maneuverable aircraft in anyone’s book) under those kinds of ceilings in Okinawa and Korea.

Donald: Give it a rest.

If we are talking capabilities here - that is the point that we are both making.
The A-10 has no capability to let down through the weather here that the Hornet’s do not have AND the Hornet’s DO have air-ground radar, digital moving maps, and that same weapons grade commensurate coordinates.

There is more to the story here.

Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2018, 09:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 11/03/08
Posts: 8522
Post Likes: +9806
Location: Peoria IL
Aircraft: D95
Like 99.9% of the population I know nothing of the technical merits one way or the other. But when the experts at the pentagon spend years determining what they need, and then at the last minute congresscritters intervene and say "no you'll do this instead" I tend to ask myself, when was the last time congress got something right ?


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 15 Oct 2018, 11:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 7400
Post Likes: +2459
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: C90; Citation II, V
This controversy will continue as what the Army folks relate they need is very different than what the Air Force wants to provide in this role. One can take a simple approach and say it's the Army's mission and the Air Force's job is to support that mission in the manner specified. Or, one can understand, the Air Force has multiple other missions. With out Air superiority or at least parity, CAS probably won't be available.
If we look to past wars and after actions reports, there were very strong write ups about the lack of CAS to ground units in post action joint reports. Part of this is definitional, but mainly it's because of the different vision the Army has of CAS v. the Air Force's view. The Naval/Marine units seem to be more in agreement.
Raising voices and discussing the bravery of other providers won't change this. One can clearly see how loitering low and slow in a medium to high intensity environment would be short lived. But, we do have a lot of circumstances where that can still be done. Army aviation certainly fills an important role, but there is a place between where those capabilities end and the Air Force picks up that will constantly be debated.

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 03 Nov 2018, 15:31 
Offline


 Profile

Joined: 11/07/09
Posts: 627
Post Likes: +166
Location: North Florida
...some of you are attempting, without success, to basically argue against history......from a historical perspective, it's not even a debatable point...the AF has for decades failed to provide adequate CAS as they have promised time and time again in their justification to keep the fixed wing $$$...

...as to my "article" referenced a few post ago, actually the DOD accounts providing the basis for decorating the Hog pilots are quite clear on the matter...I'd post it, but just out of basic privacy issues I'm hesitant to do so...bottom line, the HOG went in when the fast movers would not...it's a fact...DOD Historical Archives...for you doubters, look it up and do your own research...I'm anxiously awaiting your analysis

...but in any event, I've been actually too charitable to my friends in blue...if you really look at it from an intellectual perspective the AF has basically outlive its' usefulness as a separate Branch if they won't with enthusiasm support the ground forces...

...reading thru the past few posts...true, I suppose fast movers can fly below a 3000K foot ceiling...no kidding...but that is really not the point...point is what can they do when they get there in comparison to the HOG in the CAS role at those levels

...and your kidding yourself if you think the fast movers can fly below 3000K in low visibility AND restricted terrain as the HOG can... :rofl:

...so many questions I've posted that remain unanswered by the AF apologists in this virtual hangar....guess one of the biggest ones in my perspective is why did the AF leadership basically have to lie time and time again in their testimony before Congress and why did the AF current leadership make threats of charging their Airmen with treason if they talked to Congress about the capability about the HOG...

...it all boils down to what you think is important I guess...headed to Ft. Benning next month for an event with the Infantry Foundation...as part of the week we get to witness the graduation of some of the troops completing basic as they hold many of those ceremonies at the wonderful parade grounds by the Museum...from my perspective, these young men deserve the best we can provide for CAS in future conflicts that some of them will no doubt be in...and the best "CAS" we can provide ain't from ascot wearing fast mover pilots...fact


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 03 Nov 2018, 23:24 
Offline


 Profile

Joined: 01/22/16
Posts: 122
Post Likes: +69
The third and perhaps the most important element of CAS is the FAC (Forward Air Controller) whether he/she be on the ground or in the air. The success of a CAS mission is only as good as the FAC is in putting the eyes of the fighter on the target.

"Hit my smoke, cleared hot."


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2018, 08:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 09/29/10
Posts: 3506
Post Likes: +1911
Company: USAF Simulator Instructor
Location: Burkburnett, TX
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
Username Protected wrote:
"Hit my smoke, cleared hot."

Fortunately, that phrase is almost never heard anymore. The same electronic revolution that has taken over our GA cockpits has also taken over war fighting. If your CAS experience is more than five or ten years old, you need to go find an active duty, Guard or reserve warrior in any branch of service who is currently conducting CAS. The capabilities of the hardened, reliable, easy-to-use hardware we have deployed will astound you. The services still practice “classic CAS” in training just like we still practice VOR approaches. But that’s not how they fight any more than a VOR approach is our primary method of landing in low IFR.


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2018, 10:37 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 7400
Post Likes: +2459
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: C90; Citation II, V
War is the unfolding of miscalculations. Barbara Tuchman.

It’s wonderful that we have new targeting devices and interactive communications, when they all work. Of course, there are still limitations and times other methods may be needed.

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: AF new CAS aircraft
PostPosted: 04 Nov 2018, 12:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile

Joined: 12/16/13
Posts: 55
Post Likes: +25
Company: AAT
Aircraft: V35
Username Protected wrote:
For the type of operations such as in Afghanistan an increased use of Predator drones and covert CIA ops, SEALS, etc. is the better play in my mind, if we do it at all. Fighting these kinds of wars with uniformed troops overtly with bulls eyes on their backs is just costing too many of our troops lives, a lot of them with IED's. We shouldn't be "occupying" Afghanistan.

When I saw what was going on in the Gulf wars first hand, Eisenhower's warning of the military-industrial complex rang out loud and clear to me.



Yep, as my good friend said to me after Mosul fell the 2nd or 3rd time, your year in Iraq was a waste just like my year in Vietnam. I came back very cynical. I love my country but enough is enough.

My last assignment was a liason to FEMA, as my boss, 2 star general said, it's American's helping Americans! Now that's the miilitary i like

_________________
John Wallace
CFI, II, MEI

I'm making my own luck


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2018

.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Outright_85_50.png.
.methodseven-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.nexair_85x100.jpg.
.metarmap_85x50.jpg.
.weatherspork_85x50.jpg.
.ps_engineering.gif.
.wholesalepowertools.jpg.
.ForeFlight.jpeg.
.jaair-85x100.jpg.
.cubcrafters.jpg.
.avionicssource-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde-2017-11-01.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.jetfuelx-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.instar.jpg.
.tulsair-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.goodrich-85x150-2018-09-01.jpg.
.Davis_Aviation_85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Blackhawk_85x100.jpg.
.jlosborne-85x50.jpg.
.Electroair.jpg.
.avfab-85x50.jpg.
.dshannon.jpg.
.EagleFuelCellsTriple.jpg.
.selectairparts-85x100.jpg.
.aps-85x150.jpg.
.jetacquisitions-85x50.png.
.AviationCreation_85x50.jpg.
.phillipangert-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.2018-10-28-garmin-85x200.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.wilco.jpg.
.PistonPower_85x50.jpg.
.lopresti_85x50.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.CAV_85x50_2017_12_4.jpg.
.kingairdom.jpg.
.truecourse.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.westsky.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.avidyne-85x50-2017-11-22.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Expert_Aircraft_Solution_85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.Trace.jpg.
.airpower-85x50.jpg.
.americanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.hpair-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.Showalter.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.sureflight-85x50.jpg.
.teebee.png.
.textron-85x200-2018-07-19.jpg.
.fliteelectronics.jpg.
.bkool-85x50-2014-08-04.jpg.
.heartlandsm.jpg.